RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      「생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률」 유전자치료 조항에 대한 개선방안 = A Study on the improvements for the article of Gene Therapy in the 'Bioethics and Safety Acts' in 2008

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60163016

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Due to the success of the treatment for ADA patient, gene therapy has been presented as a new treatment for serious diseases. Nowadays gene therapy is used more than 90 times a year around the world(2006). Though it has many benefits, as many studies has pointed out, it has various kinds of ethical problems, including its scientific uncertainty, clinical risks, and the potential violation of human dignity. The Bioethics and Safety Act has been established in order to address these problems in Korea in 2005. However two provisions relevant to gene therapy in the act are not regarded as proper measure to respond these problems. The aims of this paper is to review legal aspects of gene therapy in the Bioethics and Safety Act in 2008, and to find a way to improve the article of gene therapy in the act.
      First of all, vague and ambiguous expression of the definition of gene therapy should be crystallized into the definite one. Second, the gene therapy is in general prohibited, and in particular the gene therapy with respect to a spermatozoon, ovum, embryo or fetus is prohibited. There are three exceptional circumstances which allow gene therapy. The exceptional cases contain serious diseases such as hereditary diseases, cancers, and AIDS which may threaten life or cause any serious disability, and diseases whose gene therapy would be deemed considerably more effective than any other treatment. But, the range of these exceptions is too broad to regulate the use of gene therapy. Third, although gene therapy is not regarded as a tried and reliable remedy yet, the establishment and registration of gene therapy institution is easy and simple. The last, there are two kinds of laws relevant to gene therapy which are the Bioethics and Safety Act and Pharmaceutical Affairs Act. There are some inconsistency and confusions in implementing these two laws. This paper will address legal problems, articulate inconsistencies within these laws, and find better oversight system of gene therapy in Korea.
      번역하기

      Due to the success of the treatment for ADA patient, gene therapy has been presented as a new treatment for serious diseases. Nowadays gene therapy is used more than 90 times a year around the world(2006). Though it has many benefits, as many studies ...

      Due to the success of the treatment for ADA patient, gene therapy has been presented as a new treatment for serious diseases. Nowadays gene therapy is used more than 90 times a year around the world(2006). Though it has many benefits, as many studies has pointed out, it has various kinds of ethical problems, including its scientific uncertainty, clinical risks, and the potential violation of human dignity. The Bioethics and Safety Act has been established in order to address these problems in Korea in 2005. However two provisions relevant to gene therapy in the act are not regarded as proper measure to respond these problems. The aims of this paper is to review legal aspects of gene therapy in the Bioethics and Safety Act in 2008, and to find a way to improve the article of gene therapy in the act.
      First of all, vague and ambiguous expression of the definition of gene therapy should be crystallized into the definite one. Second, the gene therapy is in general prohibited, and in particular the gene therapy with respect to a spermatozoon, ovum, embryo or fetus is prohibited. There are three exceptional circumstances which allow gene therapy. The exceptional cases contain serious diseases such as hereditary diseases, cancers, and AIDS which may threaten life or cause any serious disability, and diseases whose gene therapy would be deemed considerably more effective than any other treatment. But, the range of these exceptions is too broad to regulate the use of gene therapy. Third, although gene therapy is not regarded as a tried and reliable remedy yet, the establishment and registration of gene therapy institution is easy and simple. The last, there are two kinds of laws relevant to gene therapy which are the Bioethics and Safety Act and Pharmaceutical Affairs Act. There are some inconsistency and confusions in implementing these two laws. This paper will address legal problems, articulate inconsistencies within these laws, and find better oversight system of gene therapy in Korea.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 생명윤리법상 유전자치료 조항에 대한 분석
      • 1. 유전자치료에 대한 규율
      • 2. 생명윤리법 제2조의 유전자치료 정의 규정
      • 3. 유전자치료의 예외적 허용범위의 한계
      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 생명윤리법상 유전자치료 조항에 대한 분석
      • 1. 유전자치료에 대한 규율
      • 2. 생명윤리법 제2조의 유전자치료 정의 규정
      • 3. 유전자치료의 예외적 허용범위의 한계
      • 4. 치료기관 설립상의 문제
      • 5. 전반적 법률 구조상 체계의 혼선
      • Ⅲ. 맺으며
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한국과학기술정보연구원, "유전자치료제"

      2 권복규, "생명윤리와 법" 이화여대 출판부 2008

      3 Jeremy Rifkin, "바이오테크 시대" 민음사 2003

      4 장영민, "「생명윤리및안전에관한법률」의 유전자치료 및 배아·태아의 유전자 검사에 대한 개선 방안 연구, 보건복지부 정책연구과제“생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률의 유전자치료에 관한 운영지침 및 제도보완 방안 마련”보고서" 2006

      1 한국과학기술정보연구원, "유전자치료제"

      2 권복규, "생명윤리와 법" 이화여대 출판부 2008

      3 Jeremy Rifkin, "바이오테크 시대" 민음사 2003

      4 장영민, "「생명윤리및안전에관한법률」의 유전자치료 및 배아·태아의 유전자 검사에 대한 개선 방안 연구, 보건복지부 정책연구과제“생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률의 유전자치료에 관한 운영지침 및 제도보완 방안 마련”보고서" 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-12-27 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Bioethics Policy Studies -> Asia Pacific Journal of Health Law & Ethics KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.63 0.63 0.57
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.61 0.56 1.009 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼