RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to figure out the factors which determine the performance of Inter-firm cooperation councils with reference to the experiences of Japanese firms. An Inter-firm cooperation council is an organization where firms in a vertical value chain participate and cooperate each other to enhance the performance of firms inside a business ecosystem.
Research design, data, and methodology: This research tries to analyze the relationship among various variables such as Industry Type, Necessity of Inter-Firm Cooperation, Core Firm Size, Self-Motivation of Organization Formation, and Performance of Cooperative Supplier Council while suggesting five hypotheses with the theoretical backgrounds of transaction cost theory and RBV. Data for the analysis were collected in 2017 for 268 cases of Cooperative Supplier Council and 213 cases were finally used for the analysis. One-way ANOVA and hierarchical regression analysis were applied to test the hypotheses, and SPSS was used for the analysis.
Results: Firstly, there is no statistically meaningful relationship between Industry Type and Necessity of Inter-Firm Cooperation (H-1). However, the necessity was relatively very high in the case of the automobile industry while that was relatively low in the distribution industry. Secondly, either Necessity of Inter-Firm Cooperation or Core Firm Size respectively has a positive effect on Performance of Cooperative Supplier Council (H2-1, H3-1). Thirdly, the effect of Necessity of Inter-Firm Cooperation on Performance of Cooperative Supplier Council was higher in the case of non-voluntary formation of the council rather than in the case of voluntary formation.
Implications: As to strategic implication for firms, it can be said that firms in a vertical value chain had better form or participate in a inter-firm cooperation council when the necessity of cooperation between vertically linked businesses is very high. In addition, this article suggests the following policy implications. Firstly, the policy makers had better consider the characteristics of industries and firms when they try to expand the application of the council system. Secondly, the council system had better be applied to cases where large firms are a core firm of the council because a large firm has more competence in managing the council rather than a smaller firm. Thirdly, it is still very meaningful as a policy direction to explore and support additional new formation of Cooperative Supplier Council when the necessity of cooperation among vertically interconnected firms in a value chain is high.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이장우, "한국형 동반성장 정책의 방향과 과제" 한국중소기업학회 33 (33): 77-93, 2011

2 윤정근, "한국형 동반성장 모델구축에 관한 실증 연구: 포스코와 투자관련 중소기업과의구축 사례를 중심으로" 한국유통과학회 11 (11): 13-23, 2013

3 박상철, "한국적 동반성장의 모델 케이스: (주)화신" 한국국제경영관리학회 16 (16): 59-89, 2012

4 문수원, "한국 자동차산업의 협력관계 및 계열관계가 기업성과에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 24 (24): 275-303, 2015

5 송영조, "하도급기업의 거래관계 특성이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향" 한국산업경제학회 30 (30): 1051-1074, 2017

6 이형오, "일본 중소제조기업의 글로벌화와 한국에 대한 시사점: 일본형 히든챔피언, GNT기업의 고찰을 중심으로" 한일경상학회 84 : 35-64, 2019

7 이형오, "일본 대･중소기업 간 협력의 진화 과정 및 시사점: 국내 경제의 저성장과 계열 시스템의 약화" 한일경상학회 76 : 23-49, 2017

8 정세은, "완성차 업체와 1차 대규모 협력업체와의 동반 성장 실태 연구" 한국중소기업학회 35 (35): 187-212, 2013

9 강선민, "수·위탁기업의 경영성과 분석 : 조선, 자동차, 전기전자의 거래관계를 고려하여" 대한경영학회 25 (25): 2157-2183, 2012

10 유춘번, "상생협력 품질경영의 추진방안에 관한 연구 - 기업 내부역량의 조절효과를 중심으로 -" 한국품질경영학회 42 (42): 701-716, 2014