RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      강간 범죄자의 표적선택요인에 관한 연구- 수형자 조사를 중심으로 - = A Study on the Target Selection Factors of Rape Crime Offenders

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104114432

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study on the rape crime among a lot of criminal types from point of view of victimology to investigate the subjects below:
      Firstly, being free from precedent studies on the victimology from point of view of the victim, the study examined whether an offender committed rape crime by his rational choice.
      Secondly, even if an offender did not commit crime by rational choice from point of view of theoretically integrated models, the target was selected because of special factors: Therefore, the study examined selecting and deciding factors of criminal targets from point of view of the offender.
      On the other hand, actual proof was investigated in accordance with the purposes of the study: Most of rational choices of the offender were not made. Even if an offender did not make rational choice, he did not commit crime without consideration: Therefore, the study investigated considerations from point of view of the offender.
      An offender committed rape crime at the place that he knew well to have less floating population and to have neither CCTV nor police stations at adjacent areas.
      And, the offender thought that the victim was not likely to report rape crime without self-defence tools, and he did not have fear of imprisonment after being arrested.
      Therefore, to prevent rape crime from being victimized, both the offender and the victim should not meet by chance at the place where the offender knew well to have less floating population and to have neither CCTV nor frequent police activities, so that the victim could improve capable guardianship not to be exposed to the offender's target selection.
      On the other hand, the offender's selection factors gave priority in order of proximity to crime, attractiveness, risk and accessibility, etc to be independent from statistical significance. Therefore, considering the offender, the victim had better avoid such a place, in particular, entrance at nighttime. And, the place was required to improve environment and to expand number and scale of the police stations from point of view of criminal policy.
      번역하기

      This study on the rape crime among a lot of criminal types from point of view of victimology to investigate the subjects below: Firstly, being free from precedent studies on the victimology from point of view of the victim, the study examined whether ...

      This study on the rape crime among a lot of criminal types from point of view of victimology to investigate the subjects below:
      Firstly, being free from precedent studies on the victimology from point of view of the victim, the study examined whether an offender committed rape crime by his rational choice.
      Secondly, even if an offender did not commit crime by rational choice from point of view of theoretically integrated models, the target was selected because of special factors: Therefore, the study examined selecting and deciding factors of criminal targets from point of view of the offender.
      On the other hand, actual proof was investigated in accordance with the purposes of the study: Most of rational choices of the offender were not made. Even if an offender did not make rational choice, he did not commit crime without consideration: Therefore, the study investigated considerations from point of view of the offender.
      An offender committed rape crime at the place that he knew well to have less floating population and to have neither CCTV nor police stations at adjacent areas.
      And, the offender thought that the victim was not likely to report rape crime without self-defence tools, and he did not have fear of imprisonment after being arrested.
      Therefore, to prevent rape crime from being victimized, both the offender and the victim should not meet by chance at the place where the offender knew well to have less floating population and to have neither CCTV nor frequent police activities, so that the victim could improve capable guardianship not to be exposed to the offender's target selection.
      On the other hand, the offender's selection factors gave priority in order of proximity to crime, attractiveness, risk and accessibility, etc to be independent from statistical significance. Therefore, considering the offender, the victim had better avoid such a place, in particular, entrance at nighttime. And, the place was required to improve environment and to expand number and scale of the police stations from point of view of criminal policy.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "합리적 범죄선택이론" 서울 : 백산출판사 2005

      2 "한국형사정책연구원 강간범죄의 실태에 관한 연구 한국형사정책연구원" 1992

      3 "한국 여성운동 이념정립을 위한 시론" 2004

      4 "연쇄 강간범의 범죄심리학적 특성" 한국범죄심리학회 2 (2): 2006

      5 "아동 성폭력 범죄와 특성" 한국범죄방지재단 (19) : 2006

      6 "사회과학조사방법론" 서울 : 학현사 2001

      7 "부부강간행위의 강간죄 성립여부" 한국형사정책연구원 15 (15): 2004

      8 "범죄피해에 대한 두려움과 여성의 삶 : 사회적 구성과 결과" 서울 : 한국학술정보 2006

      9 "단순강간의 협사법상 판단기준에 관한 여성주의적 연구" 2004

      10 "강간에 대한 경찰대응방안에 관한 연구 피해자학연구" 한국피해자학회 9 (9): 2002

      1 "합리적 범죄선택이론" 서울 : 백산출판사 2005

      2 "한국형사정책연구원 강간범죄의 실태에 관한 연구 한국형사정책연구원" 1992

      3 "한국 여성운동 이념정립을 위한 시론" 2004

      4 "연쇄 강간범의 범죄심리학적 특성" 한국범죄심리학회 2 (2): 2006

      5 "아동 성폭력 범죄와 특성" 한국범죄방지재단 (19) : 2006

      6 "사회과학조사방법론" 서울 : 학현사 2001

      7 "부부강간행위의 강간죄 성립여부" 한국형사정책연구원 15 (15): 2004

      8 "범죄피해에 대한 두려움과 여성의 삶 : 사회적 구성과 결과" 서울 : 한국학술정보 2006

      9 "단순강간의 협사법상 판단기준에 관한 여성주의적 연구" 2004

      10 "강간에 대한 경찰대응방안에 관한 연구 피해자학연구" 한국피해자학회 9 (9): 2002

      11 "Victimology" Cincinnati : Anderson Publishing Co 1998

      12 "The American Dictionary of Criminal Justice : Key Terms and Major Court Cases" L. A California : Roxbury Publishing Company 2004

      13 "Offenders' choice of targets Findings from victim surveys Journal of Quantitative Criminology" 1987

      14 "Offenders' choice of targets Findings from victim surveys Journal of Quantitative Criminology" 1987

      15 "Do Criminal Offenders specialize in crime Types" Applied and Preventive Psychol, 6 1997

      16 "Crime Victims : An Introduction to Victimology" Belmont : Thomson Wadsworth 2006

      17 "An Introduction of Theoretical Victimology" Prentice-Hall Canada Inc 1991

      18 "American Journal of psychiatry" 1977

      19 "A theory of a theoretical model Journal of Research in Crime and delinquency" 1990

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-04-18 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Society For Correction Service -> Korean Society for Corrections Service KCI등재
      2016-04-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 矯正硏究 -> 교정연구
      외국어명 : Correction Review -> Corrections Review
      KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.93 0.93 1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.09 1.02 1.121 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼