RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Feasibility of Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients with Perforated Appendicitis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106842470

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Single port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) has been growing in popularity and there have been many reports on the result of SPLA. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility, safety and cosmetic satisfaction of SPLA in treat...

      Purpose: Single port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) has been growing in popularity and there have been many reports on the result of SPLA. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility, safety and cosmetic satisfaction of SPLA in treating perforated appendicitis.
      Methods: From September 2012 to March 2015, 227 patients underwent SPLA at Damsoyu hospital. The patients were divided into the simple and gangrenous appendicitis group (S & G group) and the perforated appendicitis group (P group). Operation time, hospital stay, drain insertion rate, surgical complication and cosmetic satisfaction were evaluated.
      Results: Among the total of 227 patients, there were 32 patients in the P group and 195 patients in the S & G group. There were no significant differences in the demographic data. The operation time and hospital was significantly longer in the P group (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The rate of drain insertion was also higher in the P group (p = 0.0002). But there were no differences in postoperative complications (p = 1) and cosmetic satisfaction (p = 0.090).
      Conclusion: SPLA for perforated appendicitis is a feasible, safe and cosmetically acceptable procedure. However, longer operation time and hospital stay, and higher drain insertion rate should be considered for patient undergoing SPLA for perforated appendicitis.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Nguyen NT, "Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy" 188 : 813-820, 2004

      2 이준서, "Transumbilical single port laparoscopic appendectomy using basic equipment: a comparison with the three ports method" 대한외과학회 83 (83): 212-217, 2012

      3 Gill RS, "Singleincision appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopci appendectomy : a systematic review and pooled analysis" 22 : 319-327, 2012

      4 Vilallonga R, "Single-port transumbiiclal laparoscopic appendectomy : a preliminary multicentric comparative study in 87 patients with acute appendicitis" 2012 : 492409-, 2012

      5 Lee WS, "Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy : a prospective randomized controlled study" 257 : 214-218, 2013

      6 Jeong SY, "Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy" 28 : 282-283, 2012

      7 Dimitriou I, "Single institution's experience in laparoscopic appendectomy as a suitable therapy for complicated appendicitis" 398 : 147-152, 2013

      8 St Peter SD, "Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy : a prospective randomized trial" 254 : 586-590, 2011

      9 Kuzma J, "Randomized clinical trial to compare the length of hospital stay and morbidity for early feeding with opioid-sparing analgesia versus traditional care after open appendectomy" 27 : 694-699, 2008

      10 Warren J, "Postoperative diet advancement:surgical dogma vs. evidence-based medicine" 26 : 115-125, 2011

      1 Nguyen NT, "Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy" 188 : 813-820, 2004

      2 이준서, "Transumbilical single port laparoscopic appendectomy using basic equipment: a comparison with the three ports method" 대한외과학회 83 (83): 212-217, 2012

      3 Gill RS, "Singleincision appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopci appendectomy : a systematic review and pooled analysis" 22 : 319-327, 2012

      4 Vilallonga R, "Single-port transumbiiclal laparoscopic appendectomy : a preliminary multicentric comparative study in 87 patients with acute appendicitis" 2012 : 492409-, 2012

      5 Lee WS, "Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy : a prospective randomized controlled study" 257 : 214-218, 2013

      6 Jeong SY, "Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy" 28 : 282-283, 2012

      7 Dimitriou I, "Single institution's experience in laparoscopic appendectomy as a suitable therapy for complicated appendicitis" 398 : 147-152, 2013

      8 St Peter SD, "Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy : a prospective randomized trial" 254 : 586-590, 2011

      9 Kuzma J, "Randomized clinical trial to compare the length of hospital stay and morbidity for early feeding with opioid-sparing analgesia versus traditional care after open appendectomy" 27 : 694-699, 2008

      10 Warren J, "Postoperative diet advancement:surgical dogma vs. evidence-based medicine" 26 : 115-125, 2011

      11 Markides G, "Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis : systematic review and meta-analysis" 34 : 2026-2040, 2010

      12 Golub R, "Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy : a metaanalysis" 186 : 545-553, 1998

      13 Katsuno G, "Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis : a comparison with open appendectomy" 33 : 208-214, 2009

      14 Antonacci N, "Laparoscopic appendectomy : Which factors are predictors of conversion? A high-volume prospective cohort study" 2015

      15 이진아, "Laparoscopic Appendectomy with a Single Incision in a Single Institute" 대한대장항문학회 26 (26): 260-264, 2010

      16 이종민, "Feasibility of the Short Hospital Stays after Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis" 연세대학교의과대학 55 (55): 1606-1610, 2014

      17 Semm K, "Endoscopic appendectomy" 15 : 59-64, 1983

      18 Hyeyoung Kim, "Early outcome of the Korean Diagnosis-Related Groups payment system for appendectomy" 대한외과학회 88 (88): 126-132, 2015

      19 이형순, "Early Feeding Is Feasible after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery" 연세대학교의과대학 55 (55): 395-400, 2014

      20 Kim JM, "Comparison of clinical outcomes after laparoscopic and open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis" 16 : 98-103, 2013

      21 강경채, "Application of Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Appendectomies in Patients with Complicated Appendicitis" 대한대장항문학회 26 (26): 388-394, 2010

      22 Brown CV, "Appendiceal abscess : immediate operation or percutaneous drainage?" 69 : 829-832, 2003

      23 Chung RS, "A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy" 177 : 250-256, 1999

      24 백승민, "A comparison of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: from the diagnosis to the hospital cost" 대한외과학회 85 (85): 68-74, 2013

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-07-04 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한내시경복강경외과학회 -> 대한내시경로봇외과학회
      영문명 : Korean Society of Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgeons -> The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
      KCI등재
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2016-10-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한내시경복강경외과학회지 -> Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery KCI등재후보
      2016-08-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgeons -> Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼