농촌활성화를 위한 지역유산 활용 및 마을만들기에 대한 연구 = (A) Study on the Application of Regional Heritage and Community Design for Rural Activation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Personality, diversity, and development of information technology are important elements that from the culture of centralized administration to decentralization of power. Recently, increasing leisure time through legislation of 5 day's work in week, bring to the change of leisure activity that is transformed into learning and gaining own's experience from viewing of tour. It is important opportunity that local self-government have positive attitude.
In 3th of local self-government, each self-government searches regional heritage for announcing local district. Now policy of cultural government has supported that's periodic variation. It is that is positive resident participation in rural district, and through making efficient use of rural inheritance, citizen have various rural experience, vacation, and leisure. There are some policies of Ministry of Government Administrative and Home Affairs's '아름마을가꾸기 사업'(Arummaeul project), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry's '녹색체험시범마을조성'(Green village visiting tourism project), Forest Service's '산촌종합개발계획'(mountain village master plan), Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fishes's '어촌종합개발계획'(fishing village master plan), and local self-government's project which is carried out '새농어촌 건설운동'(new village promotion) and '농촌녹색관광사업'(Green Tourism project) planed by gangwon-do.
Besides, Ministry of Government Administrative and Home Affairs have progressed to invigorate alienating small town, where have connected between urban and rural area. The character of such policies, as getting out work only leaded by central government meanwhile, is work that above all, rural residents take the leadership, in latter, government and their's works, and is a plan based on heritage of rural district.
In doing plan of Green Tourism (녹색관광, 농촌관광), and Ecomuseum regarding local area as one museum, there is main difference.
First, having something in common that their projects is based on regional heritage. Green Tourism, with increment of resident income as a side job, indeed, focus on economic profits applying local inheritage, but Ecomuseum consider the welfare of resident as one regional museum.
Green Tourism reflects visitor's convenience, and establishment as result, maybe, will be lost agricultural style. On the contrary, the concept of Ecomuseum aims to the preservation of rural and urban identity, and will have effect of activated rural in future.
Second, Green Tourism is community design leaded by residence in rural, but in finding, tendency of merely estimate of results will be hasty conclusion of plan, and diminish participation of expert advisor in community design. Important concept of Ecomuseum is together taking part in community design with expert, administration, and resident from conception to completion, and participating more special experts in plan, when need to process.
Then, in researching and analyzing on basis of the examples of induction with 'Rural Community Design' of Green Tourism and the Ecomuseum concept, for going well 'Community Design', need to some conditions in process of plan.
First, in all process from to construction, must be become level of resident leading more than resident participation, but in most process of plan, resident is dragged with taking the lead by some special experts. Although progressing plan, for transforming other opinions of resident, need to discuss fully before. Administrative have to support positive participation of resident more than progressing plan of government operation.
Second, instead of, economic income and activation of agricultural district, have to promote pride of residents, and become 'Community Design' for all dwellers being well. Coming back person who leaved in native place, through continuing this appearance, will achieve economic activation of rural.
Third, with development of plan established in short term, have to consider going ahead with plan of unreasonable and wasting estimate. Continuing to discuss with resident, rectifies if need to amendment about plan, modify from one year, fiscal year of administrative before the devise of operation plan to long-range plan, and fulfill activation of agricultural district more than a result in restricted term. Experts advise about plan for Community Design, and prepare the program of everybody participation.
Ultimately, wether successful or not activation of agricultural district, depend on positive participation of residents. If feel not using to making their opinions in 'Community Design' and progressing of plan, they are depressed in their spirits. When preparing sufficient time for plan, and assisting resident endeavor, experts and administrators seriously contribute to 'Community Design' and welfare of ourselves, and continually research the study concerning the matter.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 1. 서론 = 1
• 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 1.2 연구의 범위 및 내용 = 4
• 1.2.1 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 4
• 1.2.2 연구의 내용 = 6
• 1.3 용어의 정의 = 9
• 1.3.1 농촌활성화 = 9
• 1.3.2 지역유산 = 12
• 1.3.3 마을만들기 = 13
• 2. 농촌지원 정책의 변천과정 고찰 = 17
• 2.1 농업구조개선 = 19
• 2.1.1 격동기 = 19
• 2.1.2 산업성장기 = 20
• 2.1.3 산업성장촉진기 (농정의 전환기) = 22
• 2.1.4 국제화 시대 = 23
• 2.1.5 국민의 정부 = 24
• 2.2 생활구조개선 = 26
• 2.2.1 주택단위 사업추진 = 31
• 2.2.2 마을단위 사업추진 = 35
• 2.3 종합적인 농촌개발사업 = 41
• 2.3.1 농촌종합개발 사업 = 41
• 2.3.2 농촌관광 관련 사업의 시도 = 44
• 2.4 소결 = 47
• 3. 농촌활성화사업의 특징 = 51
• 3.1 사업추진 배경 = 51
• 3.1.1 농촌마을 개발 방식의 새로운 시도 = 51
• 3.1.2 농촌관광을 통한 농가소득증대 = 54
• 3.1.3 농촌관광 관련 연구 및 그린투어리즘 개념 = 54
• 3.2 사업목표 및 세부계획 = 70
• 3.2.1 사업목표 = 70
• 3.2.2 지침 및 세부계획 = 71
• 3.3 상향식ㆍ공모제 사업전개 방식 도입 = 75
• 3.3.1 주민참여에 의한 상향식 사업전개 = 75
• 3.3.2 사업신청 기준 = 80
• 3.3.3 사업선정 대상마을 현황 = 83
• 3.4 사업지원 내용 및 범위 = 90
• 3.4.1 사업추진 주관부서 = 90
• 3.4.2 사업지원 규모 및 내용 = 90
• 3.5 소결 = 92
• 4. 농촌활성화사업 추진마을 실태조사 = 95
• 4.1 조사대상 마을의 일반현황 = 98
• 4.1.1 일반현황 = 98
• 4.1.2 마을 입지형태 = 100
• 4.2 지역유산의 활용실태 = 100
• 4.2.1 지역유산의 유형 = 100
• 4.2.2 지역유산 활용실태 = 107
• 4.2.3 인접마을 연계 = 115
• 4.3 주민조직 및 참여 = 116
• 4.3.1 사업추진을 위한 주민조직 = 116
• 4.3.2 주민참여 실태 = 119
• 4.3.3 관람일정 및 민박유형 = 122
• 4.4 마을별 농촌활성화사업 기본계획 = 125
• 4.4.1 농촌활성화사업 계획 수립절차 = 125
• 4.4.2 농촌활성화사업 기본계획 = 128
• 4.5 의식조사 = 136
• 4.5.1 마을리더 의식조사 = 136
• 4.5.2 행정담당자 의식조사 = 141
• 4.6 소결 = 145
• 5. 지역유산을 활용한 마을만들기 = 147
• 5.1 농촌마을 만들기의 개념 설정 = 147
• 5.1.1 농촌활성화를 위한 마을만들기 개념 설정 = 147
• 5.1.2 농촌마을만들기 추진 방안 = 150
• 5.2 지역유산의 활용방안 = 154
• 5.2.1 지역유산활용의 기본개념 고찰 = 155
• 5.2.2 지역유산의 개념 확대 = 166
• 5.2.3 지역유산의 활용 방안 = 167
• 5.3 활동주체 및 조직구성 = 176
• 5.3.1 추진주체 구성 = 176
• 5.3.2 전문가ㆍ행정의 지원체제 구축 = 177
• 5.4 마을 운영 프로그램 개발 = 179
• 5.4.1 지역주민의 자긍심 고취 = 179
• 5.4.2 체험활동 개발 = 180
• 5.4.3 농업생산력 증대 = 182
• 5.4.4 지역 홍보 및 마케팅 = 182
• 5.5 제도 및 지원방안 수립 = 184
• 5.5.1 행정기관의 제도 정비 = 184
• 5.5.2 마을별 관련조례 제정 = 188
• 5.6 연구의 한계 = 189
• 6. 결론 = 191
• 참고문헌 = 193
• ABSTRACT = 197
• 부록 = 201