대법원장의 지위와 사법행정권 = The Chief Justice and the Judicial Administration Power

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the conservative and right-wing administration has bom in 2007, a reactionism has extensively been widespread in korean society. In the korean judiciary, there are some signs to tum back to the past. The recent case of Justice Shin Yeong-Chul is a typical one.
In the light of korean constitutional history, the judicial independence was influenced, at first, by the character of political power, which held an administrative and legislative power. The authoritarian political power that dominated R.O.Korea for a long time had made the judicial system of the constitutional law as an only functional regime rather than as a powerholder standing in rivalry with an administrative and legislative power. The democratization of political power, therefore, is a necessary precondition of a judicial independence. The Chief Justice and judges, however, can resist and protest to the political power to protect a judicial independence from a judicial infringement. This protest means political power struggle for the democracy and the rule of law and the judicial independence.
The judicial administration of the korean judiciary has two faces ; one is that of judicial power. The other is that of judicial function. The former means that the judiciary is a co-holder of political power and the latter means that the judiciary is one of state functions. In the korean constitutional history, the judicial administration has many problems. To sum up, there are problems as follows ; judge management system, the judicial budget system, the specialty of judges, the absence of a reasonable judicial performance evaluation system, a small scale of court system, th absence of autonomy of judicial administration in the inferior courts. For the judicial independence, it is necessary to amend the constitution including judicial system more precisely.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서언
• Ⅱ. 대법원장의 지위와 사법행정권
• 1. 우리 헌정의 경험
• 2. 경험적 반성
• Ⅲ. 현행헌법상 대법원장의 지위와 사법행정권
• 1. 현행헌법상 대법원장의 지위
• 2. 사법행정권의 문제점
• Ⅳ. 결론에 대신하여

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김철수, "헌법학(하)" 박영사 2009

2 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 2009

3 신평, "한국 헌법상 법관의 직무상 독립에 관하여" 48 (48): 2003

4 이헌환, "정치과정에 있어서의 사법권에 관한 연구" 서울대 1996

5 이국운, "이용훈 대법원장의 정교한 '사법정치학'이 성공한들…"

6 가재환, "사법운영의 이론과 실제" 박영사 1995

7 사법발전재단, "사법부의 어제와 오늘, 그리고 내일(상)" 2008

8 이헌환, "사법부의 물적 독립 - 예산안편성권과 관련하여" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 71-101, 2009

9 정진경, "사법권의 독립과 관련한 사법개혁방안" 대한변협 2001

10 법원행정처, "법원인사제도개편백서(하)" 1998

11 법원행정처, "법원사" 1995

12 방예원, "법원(법원조직법)변천 관견(IX)" (155) : 1989

13 이헌환, "법과 정치" 박영사 2007

14 이상우, "박정권하의 사법부수난" (311) : 1985

15 박철언, "바른 역사를 위한 증언 1" 랜덤하우스중앙 2005

16 송광성, "미군점령4년사" 한울 1993

17 박원순, "국가보안법 연구 2, 국가보안법적용사" 역사비평사 1992

18 김학준, "가인김병로평전" 민음사 1988

19 小田中聰樹, "現代司法の構造と思想" 日本評論社 1973

20 Barak, Aharon, "The Judge in a Democracy" Prinston Univ, Press 2006

21 Loewenstein, K., "Political Power and the Governmental Process" U. of Chicago Press 1965

22 ABA/National Conference of State Trial Judge, "Judicial Performance Evaluation Handbook"

23 Shetreet, S., "Judicial Independence : The Contemporary Debate" Kluwer Academic Publishers 1985

24 "86 Denver Univ. L.R. 1"