RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      라그랑지 입자 모델을 이용한 k-ε Algebraic Stress Model과 Mellor-Yamada Model의 비교 연구 = A Comparative Study of k-ε Algebraic Stress Model and Mellor-Yamada Model Applied to Atmospheric Dispersion Simulation Using Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Model

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40136356

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The k-ε algebraic stress model (KEASM) was applied to atmospheric dispersion simulation using the Lagrangian particle dispersion model and was compared with the most popular turbulence closure model in the field of atmospheric simulation, the Mellor-Yamada (MY) model. KEASM has been rarely applied to atmospheric simulation, but it includes the pressure redistribution effect of buoyancy due to heat and momentum fluxes. On the other hand, such effect is excluded from MY model. In the simulation study, the difference in the two turbulence models was reflected to both the turbulent velocity and the Lagrangian time scale. There was little difference in the vertical diffusion coefficient σz However, the horizontal diffusion coefficient σy calculated by KEASM was larger than that by MY model, coincided with the Pasquill-Gifford (PG) chart. The applicability of KEASM to atmospheric simulations was demonstrated by the simulations.
      번역하기

      The k-ε algebraic stress model (KEASM) was applied to atmospheric dispersion simulation using the Lagrangian particle dispersion model and was compared with the most popular turbulence closure model in the field of atmospheric simulation, the Mellor-...

      The k-ε algebraic stress model (KEASM) was applied to atmospheric dispersion simulation using the Lagrangian particle dispersion model and was compared with the most popular turbulence closure model in the field of atmospheric simulation, the Mellor-Yamada (MY) model. KEASM has been rarely applied to atmospheric simulation, but it includes the pressure redistribution effect of buoyancy due to heat and momentum fluxes. On the other hand, such effect is excluded from MY model. In the simulation study, the difference in the two turbulence models was reflected to both the turbulent velocity and the Lagrangian time scale. There was little difference in the vertical diffusion coefficient σz However, the horizontal diffusion coefficient σy calculated by KEASM was larger than that by MY model, coincided with the Pasquill-Gifford (PG) chart. The applicability of KEASM to atmospheric simulations was demonstrated by the simulations.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 모델의 개요
      • 3. 계산 조건
      • 4. 결과 및 고찰
      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 모델의 개요
      • 3. 계산 조건
      • 4. 결과 및 고찰
      • 5. 결론
      • 사사
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure" 537-566, 1975

      2 "Modeling the evolution of the convective planetary boundary layer" 1558-1572, 1980

      3 "Markov-chain simulation of particle dispersion in inhomogeneous flows the mean drift velocity induced by a gradient in eulerian velocity variance" 3-13, 1982

      4 "Lagrangian dispersion modelfor nonneutrally bupoyant plumes" 39 : 427-436, 2000

      5 "Lagrangian and Eulerian time-scale relations in the daytime boundary layer" 242-249, 1981

      6 "Improvement of the Mellor-Yamada turbulenc closure model based on large-eddy simulation data" 99 : 349-378, 2001

      7 "Evaluation of the turbulent transport and dissipation closures in second-order modeling" Wyngaard 2311-2330, 1989

      8 "Development of a nested grid second moment turbulence closure model andapplication to the 1982 ASCOT Brush Creek data simulation" 562-578, 1988

      9 "Developmen of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems" 851-875, 1982

      10 "Analytic prediction of the properties of stratified planetary surface layers" 1061-1069, 1973

      1 "Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure" 537-566, 1975

      2 "Modeling the evolution of the convective planetary boundary layer" 1558-1572, 1980

      3 "Markov-chain simulation of particle dispersion in inhomogeneous flows the mean drift velocity induced by a gradient in eulerian velocity variance" 3-13, 1982

      4 "Lagrangian dispersion modelfor nonneutrally bupoyant plumes" 39 : 427-436, 2000

      5 "Lagrangian and Eulerian time-scale relations in the daytime boundary layer" 242-249, 1981

      6 "Improvement of the Mellor-Yamada turbulenc closure model based on large-eddy simulation data" 99 : 349-378, 2001

      7 "Evaluation of the turbulent transport and dissipation closures in second-order modeling" Wyngaard 2311-2330, 1989

      8 "Development of a nested grid second moment turbulence closure model andapplication to the 1982 ASCOT Brush Creek data simulation" 562-578, 1988

      9 "Developmen of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems" 851-875, 1982

      10 "Analytic prediction of the properties of stratified planetary surface layers" 1061-1069, 1973

      11 "An atmospheric dispersion model for the environmental impact assessment of thermal power plants in Japan-a method for evaluating topographical effects," 52 : 313-323, 2002

      12 "A numerical model study of nocturnal drainage flows with strong win and temperature gradients" 545-554, 1989

      13 "A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers" 1791-1806, 1974

      14 "A comparative study of the Mellor-Yamada and k-?HH?HH tow-equation turbulence models in atmospheric application" 91 : 791-806, 2003

      15 "A Reynolds stress model of turbulence and its application to thin shear flows" 609-638, 1972

      16 "?HH?HH?HH?HH?HHN?HH?HH?HH[?HHW?HH?HH?HH[?HH?HH?HHf?HH?HH?HHE?HH?HH?HHq?HHg?HHU?HH?HH?HHf?HH?HH?HH?HH?HHp?HH?HH?HH?HH?HHg?HHU?HHp?HH?HH?HH?HH?HH[?HH^?HH?HH?HHv?HHZ?HHC?HHV?HHC?HHC40" 11-19, 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2018-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2017-04-06 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environmnet -> Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment  KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.51 0.51 0.54
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.51 0.54 0.754 0.3
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼