RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중국 증권행정집법화해제도의 법제화

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107198053

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since 2015, the Chinese government has been piloting the administrative reconciliation for security futures as part of its policy to protect stock market investors and has also provided a legal basis for its implementation to the regulations and other normative documents of China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). Pursuant to the view that the relevant details and procedures should be prescribed by law to strengthen investor protection, Chinese government amended Securities Law of the People s Republic of China in December 2019 to incorporate the enforcement of Chinese administrative reconciliation system for securities as a law. In other words, this change from the applicable regulations to the method based on the government legislated law has enhanced the applicable stability and predictability of the enforcement of Chinese administrative reconciliation system for securities. Simultaneously, the amended Securities Law has greatly upgraded investor protection against losses by adding the administrative reconciliation for securities to previously available ex-ante prevention and ex-post punishment of existing stock market misconduct. The amended Securities Law prescribes general and principle of the administrative reconciliation system – only requirements and legal effects, and in order to implement that, it must be interpreted and applied in conjunction with the existing CSRC regulations and normative documents which elaborate the applicable administrative reconciliation system. However, existing regulations and normative documents hamper the effective implementation of the administrative reconciliation for securities because they strictly stipulate the scope and requirements of its application. In addition, the sections of the administrative reconciliation system in the amended Securities Law release several problems accrued from the lack of followings: securing the right of participation, sanctioning a breaching party, incoherence with former regulations and normative documents etc. In order not to let the administrative reconciliation system for securities stipulated in the amended Securities Law of the People s Republic of China as a nominal one, the current scope and requirements of its application should be relaxed by the regulations and other normative documents of CSRC; further, by enhancing uniformity and systematicity between the administrative reconciliation system for securities stipulated by the amended Securities Law of the People s Republic of China and the relevant regulations and normative documents, the enforcement of Chinese administrative reconciliation system for securities may act as a practical one and demonstrate its genuine purpose of investor protection.
      번역하기

      Since 2015, the Chinese government has been piloting the administrative reconciliation for security futures as part of its policy to protect stock market investors and has also provided a legal basis for its implementation to the regulations and other...

      Since 2015, the Chinese government has been piloting the administrative reconciliation for security futures as part of its policy to protect stock market investors and has also provided a legal basis for its implementation to the regulations and other normative documents of China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). Pursuant to the view that the relevant details and procedures should be prescribed by law to strengthen investor protection, Chinese government amended Securities Law of the People s Republic of China in December 2019 to incorporate the enforcement of Chinese administrative reconciliation system for securities as a law. In other words, this change from the applicable regulations to the method based on the government legislated law has enhanced the applicable stability and predictability of the enforcement of Chinese administrative reconciliation system for securities. Simultaneously, the amended Securities Law has greatly upgraded investor protection against losses by adding the administrative reconciliation for securities to previously available ex-ante prevention and ex-post punishment of existing stock market misconduct. The amended Securities Law prescribes general and principle of the administrative reconciliation system – only requirements and legal effects, and in order to implement that, it must be interpreted and applied in conjunction with the existing CSRC regulations and normative documents which elaborate the applicable administrative reconciliation system. However, existing regulations and normative documents hamper the effective implementation of the administrative reconciliation for securities because they strictly stipulate the scope and requirements of its application. In addition, the sections of the administrative reconciliation system in the amended Securities Law release several problems accrued from the lack of followings: securing the right of participation, sanctioning a breaching party, incoherence with former regulations and normative documents etc. In order not to let the administrative reconciliation system for securities stipulated in the amended Securities Law of the People s Republic of China as a nominal one, the current scope and requirements of its application should be relaxed by the regulations and other normative documents of CSRC; further, by enhancing uniformity and systematicity between the administrative reconciliation system for securities stipulated by the amended Securities Law of the People s Republic of China and the relevant regulations and normative documents, the enforcement of Chinese administrative reconciliation system for securities may act as a practical one and demonstrate its genuine purpose of investor protection.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼