RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      선진 공여국의 국제개발 사례 분석 기반 지속가능성 리스크 프레임워크 제안 = Proposed Sustainability Risk Framework through the Analysis of Advanced Donor Countries‘ International Development Cases

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108846594

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The goal of international development projects is to assist sustainable development in recipient countries through foreign aid from donor countries. However, despite the need for both countries to negotiate and work together from the initial stages to maintain sustainability after the project, clear guidelines or standards have not been established. Additionally, despite the need for donor countries, which are relatively advanced, to understand the situation of recipient countries, many projects are donor-centric and fail to prioritize the value of sustainability. Therefore, this study extracted economic, social, and environmental risks that threaten sustainability through literature review and proposed a sustainability framework based on these criteria. To validate framework, actual international development cases conducted by advanced donor countries such as Australia, the United States, and Japan, in collaboration with South Korea, were analyzed by applying content analysis with the reports, which covers the overall contents from the planning stage to the operation stage. Analysis of sustainability perspectives focused on economy, society and the environment, advanced donor countries emphasized (1) the importance of pre-assessment, (2) the need for coordination with the local population and communities despite the existence of donor-specific values, and (3) addressing economic considerations such as pre-operational and maintenance costs, social communication with the local population, and environmental considerations starting from the initial stages of construction regarding the treatment of pollutants as values to be improved. Compared to other advanced donor countries, the Republic of Korea should also focus on consultation with local residents to achieve social integration, and improve sustainability by deployment the managers in local sites for better negotiation.The proposed framework in this study will serve as a tool to enhance communication among the countries and the locals, with the expectation of increasing project efficiency and sustainability.
      번역하기

      The goal of international development projects is to assist sustainable development in recipient countries through foreign aid from donor countries. However, despite the need for both countries to negotiate and work together from the initial stages to...

      The goal of international development projects is to assist sustainable development in recipient countries through foreign aid from donor countries. However, despite the need for both countries to negotiate and work together from the initial stages to maintain sustainability after the project, clear guidelines or standards have not been established. Additionally, despite the need for donor countries, which are relatively advanced, to understand the situation of recipient countries, many projects are donor-centric and fail to prioritize the value of sustainability. Therefore, this study extracted economic, social, and environmental risks that threaten sustainability through literature review and proposed a sustainability framework based on these criteria. To validate framework, actual international development cases conducted by advanced donor countries such as Australia, the United States, and Japan, in collaboration with South Korea, were analyzed by applying content analysis with the reports, which covers the overall contents from the planning stage to the operation stage. Analysis of sustainability perspectives focused on economy, society and the environment, advanced donor countries emphasized (1) the importance of pre-assessment, (2) the need for coordination with the local population and communities despite the existence of donor-specific values, and (3) addressing economic considerations such as pre-operational and maintenance costs, social communication with the local population, and environmental considerations starting from the initial stages of construction regarding the treatment of pollutants as values to be improved. Compared to other advanced donor countries, the Republic of Korea should also focus on consultation with local residents to achieve social integration, and improve sustainability by deployment the managers in local sites for better negotiation.The proposed framework in this study will serve as a tool to enhance communication among the countries and the locals, with the expectation of increasing project efficiency and sustainability.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박찬영 ; 한승헌 ; 정우용, "해외투자개발사업의 건설투자자와 금융투자자간 리스크 태도 분석" 한국건설관리학회 20 (20): 137-148, 2019

      2 정진학 ; 한종훈 ; 이주성 ; 안용한, "책임형 CM 발주방식의 최대공사비보증계약 사례연구 - 미국 공공발주 프로젝트 사례 중심 -" 한국건설관리학회 20 (20): 22-30, 2019

      3 오덕성 ; 최준성 ; Zhen Wang ; 이서정, "중국 상하이 도시재생 사업의 지속가능성 평가에 관한 연구" 한국산학기술학회 16 (16): 5627-5635, 2015

      4 임영환, "영국의 지속가능한 건축 가이드라인의 특성 연구" 대한건축학회 29 (29): 51-58, 2013

      5 손혁상 ; 공석기, "국제개발협력에서 개도국 NGO의 역할과 한계: 방글라데시 BRAC에 대한 비판적 고찰" 국제지역학회 19 (19): 23-46, 2015

      6 황재희 ; 이성우, "국제개발협력사업의 지속가능성 제고 사례 연구: 말라위와 짐바브웨의 국제농업개발협력사업을 중심으로" 한국지역개발학회 31 (31): 203-218, 2019

      7 Heale, R., "What is a case study?" 21 (21): 7-8, 2018

      8 Amiril, A., "Transportation infrastructure project sustainability factors and performance" 153 : 90-98, 2014

      9 Hussin, J. M., "The way forward in sustainable construction: issues and challenges" 2 (2): 15-24, 2013

      10 Savitz, A. W., "The Triple Bottom Line: How Today’ s Best-run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environment Success –and How You Can Too" John Wiley & Sons 2006

      1 박찬영 ; 한승헌 ; 정우용, "해외투자개발사업의 건설투자자와 금융투자자간 리스크 태도 분석" 한국건설관리학회 20 (20): 137-148, 2019

      2 정진학 ; 한종훈 ; 이주성 ; 안용한, "책임형 CM 발주방식의 최대공사비보증계약 사례연구 - 미국 공공발주 프로젝트 사례 중심 -" 한국건설관리학회 20 (20): 22-30, 2019

      3 오덕성 ; 최준성 ; Zhen Wang ; 이서정, "중국 상하이 도시재생 사업의 지속가능성 평가에 관한 연구" 한국산학기술학회 16 (16): 5627-5635, 2015

      4 임영환, "영국의 지속가능한 건축 가이드라인의 특성 연구" 대한건축학회 29 (29): 51-58, 2013

      5 손혁상 ; 공석기, "국제개발협력에서 개도국 NGO의 역할과 한계: 방글라데시 BRAC에 대한 비판적 고찰" 국제지역학회 19 (19): 23-46, 2015

      6 황재희 ; 이성우, "국제개발협력사업의 지속가능성 제고 사례 연구: 말라위와 짐바브웨의 국제농업개발협력사업을 중심으로" 한국지역개발학회 31 (31): 203-218, 2019

      7 Heale, R., "What is a case study?" 21 (21): 7-8, 2018

      8 Amiril, A., "Transportation infrastructure project sustainability factors and performance" 153 : 90-98, 2014

      9 Hussin, J. M., "The way forward in sustainable construction: issues and challenges" 2 (2): 15-24, 2013

      10 Savitz, A. W., "The Triple Bottom Line: How Today’ s Best-run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environment Success –and How You Can Too" John Wiley & Sons 2006

      11 Parkin, S., "Sustainable development: understanding the concept and practical challenge" 156 (156): 19-26, 2003

      12 Gilmour, D., "Sustainable development indicators for major infrastructure projects" 164 (164): 15-, 2011

      13 Ika, L. A., "Success conditions for international development capacity building projects" 35 (35): 44-63, 2017

      14 Lee, C., "Social conflict management framework for project viability : Case studies from Korean megaprojects" 35 (35): 1683-1696, 2017

      15 Kwon, T. W., "Proposal of hierarchical organization structure for negotiation consensus in multinational joint-client megaprojects: Case of US force relocation program in Korea" 149 (149): 05022019-, 2023

      16 이경태 ; 안한나 ; 김주형, "Project Coordinators’ Perceptions according to the Organization Structure to Reduce Communication Risks in Multinational Project" 대한토목학회 27 (27): 915-929, 2023

      17 Oh, K., "Performance and Implications of KOICA Development Consulting Business Case – Focusing on developmnet research projects" 8 (8): 24-37, 2013

      18 Oleinik, A., "On the choice of measures of reliability and validity in the content-analysis of texts" 48 (48): 2703-2718, 2014

      19 Abidin, N. Z., "Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers" 34 (34): 421-426, 2010

      20 Sev, A., "How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development?" 17 (17): 161-173, 2009

      21 Lee, K. T., "Guidelines to support negotiation for sustainable international development based on hierarchical roles and responsibilities of project-based organizations" 37 (37): 04021043-, 2021

      22 "Ex-Post Evaluation of the Irrigation Dam and Canal Construction Project in Meun District, Vientiane Province, Lao PDR" KOICA 2016

      23 Banihashemi, S., "Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries" 35 (35): 1103-1119, 2017

      24 Lee, K. T., "Comparative analysis of managers’ perception in overseas construction project risks and cost overrun in actual cases : A perspective of the Republic of Korea" 22 (22): 2291-2308, 2023

      25 Ahsan, K., "Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects" 28 (28): 68-78, 2010

      26 Martens, M. L., "An exploratory study of sustainability evaluation in project management" 11 (11): 111-117, 2017

      27 Kyoung, H., "An Analysis of Landscape assessment through Analyzing Characteristics of Urban Landscape in Sustainable Urban Development - In Case of Subtitle New York Hudson Yard Development" 37 (37): 444-447, 2017

      28 Shen, L. Y., "A checklist for assessing sustainability performance of construction projects" 13 (13): 273-281, 2007

      29 Lim, Y., "A Probe on Research Direction of Sustainable Architectural Planning-In Nontechnological Ways" 26 (26): 117-126, 2010

      30 Asian Development Bank, "2018 Annual Evaluation Review" 2018

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼