RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      중환자실 입실 우선순위 결정에 따른 입실환자와 입실거절환자의 예후 비교 = Triage Decision For ICU Admission And Patients’ Outcome

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104327940

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: We constructed a prospective study to evaluate the outcome of patients referred to an intensivist for ICU admission as well as the factors associated with ICU admission refusal.
      Methods: Patients referred for ICU admission to medico-surgical ICU in our hospital for 16 weeks were included in this study. We classified the reasons for refusal into three categories: inappropriate referral; triage; futility. Also we classified admitted patients into two categories: immediate admission; delayed admission. After initial evaluation of a patient by an intensivist, we checked the patient's outcome for following 28 days.
      Results: 632 patients had been referred for ICU admission during study period. Among them, 445 (70%) patients were admitted and 187 (30%) patients were refused ICU admission. 116 patients were refused because of inappropriate referral, 52 for triage and 19 for futility. 394 patients were admitted immediately and 51 were refused initially but were later admitted. When 116 inappropriate referral patients were excluded, the mortality rates for immediate admission, delayed admission and triage/futility were 14.4%, 39.2% and 56.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). Standardized mortality ratio was 0.70 for immediate admission, 1.20 for delayed admission, 1.28 for triage and 1.30 for futility (P < 0.05). The factors associated with refusal for ICU admission were age, medical division, diagnostic group and high Mortality Probability Model II0 (MPM II0) grades.
      Conclusions: Because the triage decision for ICU admission influences the patients’ outcome, an intensivist must carefully come to a decision when admitting patients to ICU by considering the appropriate guidelines for ICU admission and triage.
      번역하기

      Background: We constructed a prospective study to evaluate the outcome of patients referred to an intensivist for ICU admission as well as the factors associated with ICU admission refusal. Methods: Patients referred for ICU admission to medico-su...

      Background: We constructed a prospective study to evaluate the outcome of patients referred to an intensivist for ICU admission as well as the factors associated with ICU admission refusal.
      Methods: Patients referred for ICU admission to medico-surgical ICU in our hospital for 16 weeks were included in this study. We classified the reasons for refusal into three categories: inappropriate referral; triage; futility. Also we classified admitted patients into two categories: immediate admission; delayed admission. After initial evaluation of a patient by an intensivist, we checked the patient's outcome for following 28 days.
      Results: 632 patients had been referred for ICU admission during study period. Among them, 445 (70%) patients were admitted and 187 (30%) patients were refused ICU admission. 116 patients were refused because of inappropriate referral, 52 for triage and 19 for futility. 394 patients were admitted immediately and 51 were refused initially but were later admitted. When 116 inappropriate referral patients were excluded, the mortality rates for immediate admission, delayed admission and triage/futility were 14.4%, 39.2% and 56.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). Standardized mortality ratio was 0.70 for immediate admission, 1.20 for delayed admission, 1.28 for triage and 1.30 for futility (P < 0.05). The factors associated with refusal for ICU admission were age, medical division, diagnostic group and high Mortality Probability Model II0 (MPM II0) grades.
      Conclusions: Because the triage decision for ICU admission influences the patients’ outcome, an intensivist must carefully come to a decision when admitting patients to ICU by considering the appropriate guidelines for ICU admission and triage.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Triaging patients to the ICU:a pilot study of factors influencing admission decisions and patient outcomes" 29 : 774-81, 2003

      2 "Triage Decision for ICU admission and patients outcome The 23rd Scientific Congress of the KSCCM and the 3rd Joint Congress of Korean- Japanese Intensivists" 2003

      3 "Survival of critically ill patients hospitalized in and out of intensive care units under paucity of intensive care units beds" 32 : 1654-60, 2004

      4 "Recent innovations in intensive care unit risk prediction models" Curr Opin Crit Care 8 : 321-30, 2002

      5 "Rationing of intensive care unit services" 225 : 1143-6, 1986

      6 "Rationing intensive care-physician responses to a resource shortage" 309 : 1155-60, 1983

      7 "Prospective evaluation of patients refused admission to an intensive care unit" 1459-65, 2001

      8 "Mortality probability models(MPM II)based on an international cohort of intensive care patients" 270 : 2478-86, 1993

      9 "Guidelines for intensive care unit admission,discharge,and triage" 27 : 633-38, 1999

      10 "Evaluation of triage decisions for intensive care admission" 27 : 1073-9, 1999

      1 "Triaging patients to the ICU:a pilot study of factors influencing admission decisions and patient outcomes" 29 : 774-81, 2003

      2 "Triage Decision for ICU admission and patients outcome The 23rd Scientific Congress of the KSCCM and the 3rd Joint Congress of Korean- Japanese Intensivists" 2003

      3 "Survival of critically ill patients hospitalized in and out of intensive care units under paucity of intensive care units beds" 32 : 1654-60, 2004

      4 "Recent innovations in intensive care unit risk prediction models" Curr Opin Crit Care 8 : 321-30, 2002

      5 "Rationing of intensive care unit services" 225 : 1143-6, 1986

      6 "Rationing intensive care-physician responses to a resource shortage" 309 : 1155-60, 1983

      7 "Prospective evaluation of patients refused admission to an intensive care unit" 1459-65, 2001

      8 "Mortality probability models(MPM II)based on an international cohort of intensive care patients" 270 : 2478-86, 1993

      9 "Guidelines for intensive care unit admission,discharge,and triage" 27 : 633-38, 1999

      10 "Evaluation of triage decisions for intensive care admission" 27 : 1073-9, 1999

      11 "Compliance with triage to intensive care recommendations" 29 : 2132-6, 2001

      12 "Civilian triage in the intensive care unit:the ritual of the last bed" 21 : 598-606, 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼