RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Senior Level Designers - Designers Shared Leadership Model in Interior Design Companies: The Consequence of an Investigation among Leading Designers in Nine Companies in Korea.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103736937

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Interior design companies in Seoul, Korea, senior level designers-designers shared leadership model has not been implemented by the design management. The whole interior design companies are worked each by a leadership team consisting of senior level designers, contractors and designers, being accountable for company, workers, and budgets. The results for workers’ opinion in leadership positions were evaluated. All 154 leading workers of all professional teams were anonymously interviewed with a questionnaire containing 45 items regarding their satisfaction with this new shared leadership model. The response rate was 96.2%. After all, the leading workers were satisfied with the shared leadership model both in their own designing practice and in general. Non-design workers were comprehensively more in favor of quite a few aspects of shared leadership than senior level designers, but even the latter reported to be generally satisfied. However, both professional teams estimated leading positions to be only modestly attractive. The consequences yield some evidence that the transform from traditional leadership models to the senior level designers -designers shared leadership model may have advantages in the management of interior design companies. Furthermore, there is a need for greater clarity about precisely what we mean by shared leadership and also a deeper exploration of potential challenges arising from shared leadership models if we are to try to come to terms with their practice.
      번역하기

      Interior design companies in Seoul, Korea, senior level designers-designers shared leadership model has not been implemented by the design management. The whole interior design companies are worked each by a leadership team consisting of senior level ...

      Interior design companies in Seoul, Korea, senior level designers-designers shared leadership model has not been implemented by the design management. The whole interior design companies are worked each by a leadership team consisting of senior level designers, contractors and designers, being accountable for company, workers, and budgets. The results for workers’ opinion in leadership positions were evaluated. All 154 leading workers of all professional teams were anonymously interviewed with a questionnaire containing 45 items regarding their satisfaction with this new shared leadership model. The response rate was 96.2%. After all, the leading workers were satisfied with the shared leadership model both in their own designing practice and in general. Non-design workers were comprehensively more in favor of quite a few aspects of shared leadership than senior level designers, but even the latter reported to be generally satisfied. However, both professional teams estimated leading positions to be only modestly attractive. The consequences yield some evidence that the transform from traditional leadership models to the senior level designers -designers shared leadership model may have advantages in the management of interior design companies. Furthermore, there is a need for greater clarity about precisely what we mean by shared leadership and also a deeper exploration of potential challenges arising from shared leadership models if we are to try to come to terms with their practice.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Parker, G., "Team players and teamwork: New strategies for developing successful collaboration. (2nd ed.)" Jossey-Bass 2008

      2 Pojasek, R. B., "Sustainability reports: An alternative view" 18 (18): 85-92, 2008

      3 Jackson, A., "Sustainability and Triple Bottom Line Reporting - What is it all about?" 1 (1): 55-59, 2011

      4 Robert, B., "Sustainability Reports: An Alternative View" 2009

      5 Crews, D. E., "Strategies for Implementing Sustainability: Five Leadership Challenges" 75 (75): 15-21, 2010

      6 Conger, J., "Sharing Leadership on Corporate Boards: A Critical Requirement for Teamwork at the Top"

      7 Small, E., "Shared Leadership in Teams" 9 (9): 203-211, 2010

      8 Pojasek, R. B., "Quality toolbox: Creating a complete business management system" 17 (17): 87-95, 2008

      9 Jönsson, A. C., "Participation of professional categories when re organising two hospitals – A comparative study and evaluation" 11 : 234-241, 2003

      10 Hickman, G. R., "Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (2nd ed.)" SAGE Publications 2010

      1 Parker, G., "Team players and teamwork: New strategies for developing successful collaboration. (2nd ed.)" Jossey-Bass 2008

      2 Pojasek, R. B., "Sustainability reports: An alternative view" 18 (18): 85-92, 2008

      3 Jackson, A., "Sustainability and Triple Bottom Line Reporting - What is it all about?" 1 (1): 55-59, 2011

      4 Robert, B., "Sustainability Reports: An Alternative View" 2009

      5 Crews, D. E., "Strategies for Implementing Sustainability: Five Leadership Challenges" 75 (75): 15-21, 2010

      6 Conger, J., "Sharing Leadership on Corporate Boards: A Critical Requirement for Teamwork at the Top"

      7 Small, E., "Shared Leadership in Teams" 9 (9): 203-211, 2010

      8 Pojasek, R. B., "Quality toolbox: Creating a complete business management system" 17 (17): 87-95, 2008

      9 Jönsson, A. C., "Participation of professional categories when re organising two hospitals – A comparative study and evaluation" 11 : 234-241, 2003

      10 Hickman, G. R., "Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (2nd ed.)" SAGE Publications 2010

      11 Marissa, L., "Leading One Another Across Time and Space: Exploring Shared Leadership Functions in Virtual Teams" 26 (26): 3-17, 2010

      12 Maital, S., "Innovation management: Strategies, concepts and tools for growth and profit" Response Books 2007

      13 Uma, V., "Improving health outcomes for black and minority ethnic communities through shared leadership" 3 (3): 44-48, 2010

      14 Haugh, H., "How Do Corporations Embed Sustainability Across the Organization? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), p" 9 (9): 384-396, 2010

      15 Ofir, T., "Does virtual team composition matter? Trait and problem-solving configuration effects on team performance" 29 (29): 363-375, 2010

      16 Mirvis, P. H., "Creating a community of leaders" 35 (35): 69-82, 2006

      17 Groves, "An empirical study of leader ethical values, transformational and transactional leadership, and follower attitudes toward corporate social responsibility" 103 (103): 511-528, 2011

      18 Merkens, B. J., "A successful and necessary evolution to shared leadership: a hospital’s story" 11 : 1-4, 1998

      19 Steinert, T., "A nurse– physician co-leadership model in psychiatric hospitals: Results of a survey among leading staff members in three sites" 15 : 251-257, 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2007-05-04 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korea Contents Society -> The Korea Contents Association
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.21 0.21 0.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.16 0.13 0.317 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼