도르트 총회와 신조에서 신학적, 목회적 측면의 균형 = Balance between the theological and pastoral aspect in the synod of Dordt

국문 초록 (Abstract)

도르트 신조와 이 신조를 작성한 도르트 총회는 항론파 때문에 발생한 네덜란드 개혁교회의 위기를 극복하기 위한 것이었다. 따라서 일차적으로 이 총회의 목적은 항론파의 신학적 주장에 대한 반박을 목적으로 했다. 그러나 총회의 대표들은 단지 이들의 주장을 반박하는데만 목적을 제한하지 않았다. 오히려 주께서 교회를 목양하시며 교회를 강하게 세워가는 목회적 성격을 강하게 의식하였다. 곧, 신학적 논쟁에 매몰되지 않으면서 목회적 목적에 주목하였다. 첫째, 도르트 신조의 구조와 내용, 서술 방식이 이를 보여준다. 신조는 항론파를 반박하는 오류와 반박 부분을 포함하되 하이델베르크 요리문답의 구조를 담은 긍정적인 서술들을 앞세워서 교회의 가르침으로 자리잡았다. 한편으로 성경전체의 내용을 담는 새로운 신앙고백이 아니라 이전에 교회가 고백한 신앙문서를 확인하는데 정체성을 두었다. 둘째, 전택설과 후택설이라는 개혁주의 예정론의 긴장과 논쟁점을 전면에 내세우지 않았다. 오히려 항론파의 공격에서 비켜나 있는 후택설에 가까운 신조를 작성하였다. 그러나 전택설을 버리고 후택설을 택하는 방식은 아니었다. 오히려 교회를 위한 복음의 가르침의 구조를 드러내고 복음 설교를 중심에 두는 그리스도의 말씀의 목양을 전면에 부각시켰다. 마지막으로 도르트 총회는 도르트 신조뿐 아니라 교회법을 작성해서 총회의 최종적인 목적이 교회를 세워가기 위한 것이었다는 점을 확인하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The synod of Dordt was to overcome the crisis of the Dutch Reformed Churches caused by the Arminianism. Therefore, the purpose of the synod was primarily to refute the theological claim of the Remonstrants. However, the delegates of the synod did not limit the purpose of refusing these claims alone. Rather, they paid attention to pastoral purposes. Not to be buried in theological debate, they did their efforts to strengthen the reformed churches. First, the structure, content, and description of the Canons of Dordt show this. Although Canons contained refutations, it is preceded by positive descriptions following the structure of the Heidelberg Catechism. It was not a new confession of faith that contained the whole article of faith but took an identity that made clear the Belgic Confessions and Catechism that the church had previously confessed. Second, it did not put forward the tension and controversies of supra-infra lapsarianism. Its position was close to the infralapsarianism left out of the attack of the Remonstrants. However, it was not a method to abandon the supralapsarianism. Rather, it revealed the structure of the gospel teaching and highlighted Christ's Word centered on the preaching of the gospel. Finally, synod confirmed that the final destination was to build up the churches in taking not only Canons but also the church ordinance.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 안인섭, "칼빈의 개혁 신앙과 교회와 국가의 관계: 네덜란드의 코른헤르트(Dirck Coornhert: 1522-1590)와의 논쟁을 중심으로" 한국개혁신학회 55 : 8-39, 2017

2 이남규, "위로와 확신의 근거－하나님의 예정: 16세기말 하이델베르그 신학자들과 도르트신조의 예정론을 중심으로" 한국복음주의신학회 58 : 283-312, 2011

3 Gootjes, Nicolaas H, "세례와 성찬" 성약 2005

4 Graafland, C., "van Calvijn tot Comrie : Oorsprong en ontwikkeling van de leer van het verbond in het Gereformeerd Protestantism" Boekencentrum 1996

5 Arminius, Jacobus, "the Works of Arminius vol. 1 and 3" Baker 1999

6 van Asselt, Willen J., "the Theologian's Tool Kit: Johannes Maccovius and the Development of Reformed Theological Distinctions" 68 : 23-40, 2006

7 Sinnema, Donald. W., "the Issue of Reprobation at the Synod of Dort in Light of the History of This Doctrine" University of St. Michael's College 1985

8 Gootjes, Nicolaas H., "the Belgic Confession: Its History and Sources" Baker 135-, 2007

9 Sinnema, Donald. W., "in Revisiting the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619)" Brill 2011

10 Kamphuis, J., "Zo Vonder We Elkaar" Uitgeverij De Vuurbaak 1970

11 van ‘t Spijker, W., "Troostboek van de Kerk Ed" Den Hertog 2005

12 Verboom, Wim, "Troostboek van de Kerk" Den Hertog 2005

13 Klauber, Martin I., "The Use of Philosophy in the Theology of Johannes Maccovius (1578– 1644)" 30 : 371-385, 1995

14 Godfrey, W. Robert, "Revisiting the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619)" Brill 2011

15 유해무, "Raad en Daad: Infra- en Supralapsarisme in de nederlandse gereformeerde theologie van de 19e en 20e Eeuw" uitgeverij Mondiss 1990

16 Calvin, John, "Joannis Calvini opera quae supersunt omnia 52" C. A. Schwetschke 1863

17 van ‘t Spijker, W, "Inleiding tot de studie van het Kerkrecht" kok 1992

18 Trimp, C., "Het Leerambt niet Verspelen; de Uitstraling van de Schrift in de bediening van het Woord" uitgeverij De Vuurbaak 1993

19 Venema, Cornelis P., "Heinrich Bullinger’s Correspondence on Calvin’s Doctrine ofPredestination, 1551–53" 4 : 435-450, 1986

20 Muller, Richard, "God, Creation and Providence in the Thought of Jacob Arminius" Baker 1991

21 den Boer, Willem, "Duplex amor Dei: Contextuele karakteristiek van de theologie van Jacobus Arminius" Publications of the Institute for ReformationResearch 2008

22 Fesko, J. V., "Drawn into Controversie Reformed Theological Diversity and Debates Within Seventeenth-Century British Puritanism" Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2011

23 van ‘t Spijker, W., "De Synode van Dordrecht in 1618 en 1619" Den Hertog 1987

24 J. N. Bakhuizen, "De Nederlandse Belijdenisgeschriften in authentieke teksten" uitgeverij Ton Bolland 1976

25 Praamsma, Louis, "Crisis in the Reformed Churches: Essays in Commemoration of the Great Synod of Dort, 1618-1619" ReformedFellowship 2008

26 Palmer, E. H., "Crisis in the Reformed Church: Essays in commemoration of the Great synod of Dort, 1618-1619" Reformed Fellowship 2008

27 de Jong, Peter Y., "Crisis in the Reformed Church: Essays in commemoration of the Great synod of Dort, 1618-1619" Reformed Fellowship 2008

28 Fesko, J. V., "Beyond Calvin: Union with Christ and Justification in Early Modern Reformed Theology (1517-1700)." Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2012

29 Bangs, Carl, "Arminius : A Study in the Dutch Reformation" Abingdon 1970

30 Acta ofte handerlinghen der nationalen Synodi tot Dordrecht, anno 1618 ende, "Acta ofte handerlinghen der nationalen Synodi tot Dordrecht, anno 1618 ende 1619" Isaack Iansz. Canin 1619

31 Acta Authentica, "Acta Et Documenta Synodi Nationalis Dordrechtanae (1618-1619)" Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2015

32 Selderhuis, Herman J., "Acta Et Documenta Synodi Nationalis Dordrechtanae (1618-1619)" Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2015