RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      교육방법으로서 흥미・체험・사고:

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105217229

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      As the scientific understanding of learning and cognitive processes has developed, various alternative methods in education have been searched for. But classroom teachers experience pressure and confusion for the improvement of teaching and learning methods. It appears that the problem has become serious since the philosophical concerns are confined to the purpose and ideal conception of education in distinction from the problem of methods for classroom practices. The philosophical approach is needed in a way as to communicate with existing scientific approaches to the problem of methods in education. This paper explores Dewey’s philosophical ideas on the nature of method in education with a view to providing a new insight for the current problematic situation, given his pervasive efforts to integrate the dualistic oppositions between philosophy and reality, means and ends, theory and practice. To begin with, I examine the ancient etymological meaning of method and Dewey’s conceptual discussion about it, which illuminates the characteristic limitations of the current technical approach in light of the original active procedural meaning of method. The major inquiry is focused on Dewey s constructive end critical thoughts on interest, experience, and thinking as mehtods in education, which shows that unlike ordinary uses, each of three concepts does not oppose to mental discipline, subject knowledge, and free activity. In conclusion, Dewey s critical insight into the problem of educational methods is to dismantle and reconstruct the distorted meanings due to the undemocratic social life situations and also to the dualistic ideas of modern philosophy.
      번역하기

      As the scientific understanding of learning and cognitive processes has developed, various alternative methods in education have been searched for. But classroom teachers experience pressure and confusion for the improvement of teaching and learning m...

      As the scientific understanding of learning and cognitive processes has developed, various alternative methods in education have been searched for. But classroom teachers experience pressure and confusion for the improvement of teaching and learning methods. It appears that the problem has become serious since the philosophical concerns are confined to the purpose and ideal conception of education in distinction from the problem of methods for classroom practices. The philosophical approach is needed in a way as to communicate with existing scientific approaches to the problem of methods in education. This paper explores Dewey’s philosophical ideas on the nature of method in education with a view to providing a new insight for the current problematic situation, given his pervasive efforts to integrate the dualistic oppositions between philosophy and reality, means and ends, theory and practice. To begin with, I examine the ancient etymological meaning of method and Dewey’s conceptual discussion about it, which illuminates the characteristic limitations of the current technical approach in light of the original active procedural meaning of method. The major inquiry is focused on Dewey s constructive end critical thoughts on interest, experience, and thinking as mehtods in education, which shows that unlike ordinary uses, each of three concepts does not oppose to mental discipline, subject knowledge, and free activity. In conclusion, Dewey s critical insight into the problem of educational methods is to dismantle and reconstruct the distorted meanings due to the undemocratic social life situations and also to the dualistic ideas of modern philosophy.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼