RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Identification of synthetic survival and synthetic survival burden in multiple cancer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13925076

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: According to cancer genomics become prevalent, large cancer genome projects are launched and almost finished. From these project, a huge amount of genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic data is released in public. This public data have provided quite some studies of somatic mutations in cancer cell, then many researchers have identified several cancer-related genes. However, some existing cancer genomics studies have a limitations. Many studies are restricted to single cancer type or single cancer driver gene. It can limit study’s scope to identify how cancer occur, develop and progress. To solve this problem, a concept of synthetic lethality is arisen. Synthetic lethality is a concept that a combination of mutations in two genes
      lead to cell death, while a mutation in an only one of these genes remains cell survival. We propose a concept synthetic survival based on the idea of synthetic lethality. Synthetic Survival (SS) is a concept that a combinations of mutations in two gene lead to patients survival, whereas a mutation in only one gene lead to patients bad prognosis. The goal of this dissertation is to identify synthetic survival and synthetic survival burden in multiple cancers.
      Method: We downloaded 9,184 patients’ clinical information and 6,936 patients’ somatic mutation data in 20 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas. all of data is open-accessed data. To make core data set for further analysis, several criteria is applied to filter out data which is not able to analysis. All genes harboring at least one non-synonymous mutations are annotated to gene damaging score. Gene damaging score is a measure to quantify each gene’s deleteriousness. Gene damaging score is derived from both scores in Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant and classification of LoF mutations. By gene damaging score, patients are stratified to four groups. Survival analysis are conducted for all gene pairs’ group with cox proportional hazard model with penalized likelihood. From the cox model, candidates of potential synthetic survival pairs are decided.
      Result: The result from filtering raw data, we build the core data set for 4,844 patients including clinical information and somatic mutation profiles. For candidates of potential synthetic survival pairs, 436 gene pairs are identified in 5 cancer types. We also identified synthetic survival burden which means that the group which have more SS pairs and triplets have higher survival rate than the group which have less SS pairs
      Discussion: In this dissertation, Candidate SS pairs are identify by only performing survival analysis with cox proportional hazard model and also ensure that the number of SS pairs is related to patient’s prognosis. Genes consisting SS pairs are usually related to cell-cell interaction or migration so might be action to prevent metastasis, then shows good prognosis. This study might be approach to reduce cost for screening and to apply practical clinical uses.
      번역하기

      Background: According to cancer genomics become prevalent, large cancer genome projects are launched and almost finished. From these project, a huge amount of genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic data is released in public. This public data have provid...

      Background: According to cancer genomics become prevalent, large cancer genome projects are launched and almost finished. From these project, a huge amount of genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic data is released in public. This public data have provided quite some studies of somatic mutations in cancer cell, then many researchers have identified several cancer-related genes. However, some existing cancer genomics studies have a limitations. Many studies are restricted to single cancer type or single cancer driver gene. It can limit study’s scope to identify how cancer occur, develop and progress. To solve this problem, a concept of synthetic lethality is arisen. Synthetic lethality is a concept that a combination of mutations in two genes
      lead to cell death, while a mutation in an only one of these genes remains cell survival. We propose a concept synthetic survival based on the idea of synthetic lethality. Synthetic Survival (SS) is a concept that a combinations of mutations in two gene lead to patients survival, whereas a mutation in only one gene lead to patients bad prognosis. The goal of this dissertation is to identify synthetic survival and synthetic survival burden in multiple cancers.
      Method: We downloaded 9,184 patients’ clinical information and 6,936 patients’ somatic mutation data in 20 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas. all of data is open-accessed data. To make core data set for further analysis, several criteria is applied to filter out data which is not able to analysis. All genes harboring at least one non-synonymous mutations are annotated to gene damaging score. Gene damaging score is a measure to quantify each gene’s deleteriousness. Gene damaging score is derived from both scores in Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant and classification of LoF mutations. By gene damaging score, patients are stratified to four groups. Survival analysis are conducted for all gene pairs’ group with cox proportional hazard model with penalized likelihood. From the cox model, candidates of potential synthetic survival pairs are decided.
      Result: The result from filtering raw data, we build the core data set for 4,844 patients including clinical information and somatic mutation profiles. For candidates of potential synthetic survival pairs, 436 gene pairs are identified in 5 cancer types. We also identified synthetic survival burden which means that the group which have more SS pairs and triplets have higher survival rate than the group which have less SS pairs
      Discussion: In this dissertation, Candidate SS pairs are identify by only performing survival analysis with cox proportional hazard model and also ensure that the number of SS pairs is related to patient’s prognosis. Genes consisting SS pairs are usually related to cell-cell interaction or migration so might be action to prevent metastasis, then shows good prognosis. This study might be approach to reduce cost for screening and to apply practical clinical uses.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. Introduction.....................................................................................1
      • 1.1 Cancer genomics.......................................................................1
      • 1.2 Existing studies in cancer genomics.....................................2
      • 1.3 Synthetic lethality and Synthetic Survival (SS).................2
      • I. Introduction.....................................................................................1
      • 1.1 Cancer genomics.......................................................................1
      • 1.2 Existing studies in cancer genomics.....................................2
      • 1.3 Synthetic lethality and Synthetic Survival (SS).................2
      • 1.4 Research goal............................................................................3 1
      • .5 Related studies..........................................................................4
      • II. Methods & Materials....................................................................5
      • 2.1 Data..............................................................................................5
      • 2.2 Data Processing(Filtering)........................................................5
      • 2.3 Gene Damaging Score...............................................................6
      • 2.4 Cox proportional hazard model with penalized likelihood....7
      • 2.5 Synthetic Surival burden.......................................................8
      • III. Result..............................................................................................9
      • 3.1 TCGA core data set.................................................................9
      • 3.2 Gene damaging score distribution..........................................9
      • 3.3 Candidate Synthetic Survival pairs.....................................10
      • 3.4 Synthetic Survival burden...................................................11
      • IV. Conclusion & Discussion............................................................11
      • V. References.....................................................................................13
      • 국문초록...............................................................................................34
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼