행복연구학회지 게재 논문의 메타분석적 접근

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to provide diverse research subjects and theoretical basis to national happiness studies after all via analysis of contents in the JHS. This study analyzes 125 articles of JHS throughout their field, subjects, objects, and method of study as the method to proceed the purpose of this research. The result are as follows. First, Studying field is mainly covered by empirical researches on subjective Well-being, theoretical reflect of quality of life, and philosophical field related to the happiness as well. Second, socio-psychological variables mostly have been studied, and happiness measurements, such as researching the level of the happiness among a certain group, have mainly been conducted as subject of study. Third, majority of studying objects were general public, and some has been proceeded globally on large scale, especially on research of the happiness level. Besides, youths and collage students have mostly been taking part of the studying objects, and some minority focused on special class of people, such as the Masai. Finally, various methods of study, e.g. investigating, qualitative method, integrated method, vertical method, and cultural research method etc., have been used in contrast to our quantitative studying method. This concludes that there should be new trial of various studying method indeed in our field of leisure study.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김헌일, "한국 여가레크리에이션 학회지 연구경향 분석" 한국여가레크리에이션학회 27 : 93-109, 2004

2 Tashakkori, "통합연구방법론" 학지사 2001

3 김은미, "청소년의 여가활동과 행복과의 관계" 한국아동교육학회 16 (16): 155-172, 2007

4 김병준, "운동과 행복" 99 : 34-39, 2007

5 노용구, "여가학" 대경북스 2001

6 이영길, "여가는 행복을 위해 중요한가? 긍정심리학자의 관점을 이용한 이론전 담론" 한국여가레크리에이션학회 30 (30): 5-20, 2006

7 박세혁, "여가 및 레크리에이션의 연구 동향" 45 : 34-35, 2006

8 이문성, "아리스토텔레스의 에우다이모니아 개념에 근거한 스포츠에서의 행복 연구" 15 (15): 129-136, 2007

9 이연주, "배드민턴 참가자들의 여가활동 전문화와 여가젱체성 및 행복의 관계" 한국여가레크리에이션학회 31 (31): 19-30, 2007

10 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "몰입의 기술(이삼출 역,2003)" 더불어책 1975

11 노용구, "몰입(Flow)이론을 적용한 여가상담에 관한 연구" 한국여가레크리에이션학회 29 : 109-119, 2005

12 이진형, "레크리에이션 전문화(Recreational Speation) 연구:미국의 연구 동향과 국내 연구방향" 한국여가레크리에이션학회 28 : 67-78, 2005

13 김인자, "긍정심리학:진정한 행복 만들기" 물푸레 2006

14 성태제, "교육연구방법의 이해" 학지사 1998

15 Kelly, J. R., "eisure styles: A hidden core" 5 : 321-333, 1983

16 Myers, D. G., "Who is happy" 6 : 10-19, 1995

17 Veenhoven, R., "The four qualities of life" 1 (1): 1-39, 2000

18 Deci, E. L., "The Independent Effects of GoalContents and Motives on Well-Being: It'sBoth What You Pursue and Why YouPursue It" 30 (30): 475-486, 2004

19 Balatsky, G., "Subjective well-beingamong Russian students" 28 : 225-243, 1993

20 Diener, E., "Subjective well-being" 95 : 542-575, 1984

21 Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy: toward a unifyingtheory of behavioral change" 84 : 191-215, 1977

22 Stebbins, R. A., "New direction in theory and researchof serious leisure" EdwinMellen Press 2001

23 Diener, E., "National difference in reported well-being:Why do they occur?" 34 : 7-32, 1995

24 Reich, J. W., "Life events and personalcausation" 41 : 1002-1012, 1981

25 Mishra, S., "Leisure activities and life satisfactionin old age: a case study of retired governmentemployees living in urban areas.Activities" 16 (16): 7-26, 1992

26 Freedman, J., "Happy people: What happiness is,who has it, and why" HarcourtBrace Jovanovich 1978

27 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Flow" 한울림 1990

28 Borg, W. R., "Educational research" Longman 1983

29 Diener, E., "Editorial" 1 (1): 5-8, 2000

30 Seligman, M. E. P., "Authentic happiness" Free Press 2002

31 Diener, E., "Assessing subjective well-being:Progress and opportunities" 31 : 103-157, 1994

32 Triandis, H. C., "A method for determining cultural,demographic, and personal constructs" 21 : 302-318, 1990