RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      다중흐름모형을 적용한 정신건강복지법 개정 과정 분석 = Analysis of the Revision Process of the Mental Health Welfare Act Using the Multiple Streams Model

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109472771

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In December 2023, a partial amendment to the Mental Health Welfare Act was passed, introducing four new provisions: peer support, peer support shelters, procedural assistance, and adult guardianship. This is significant as it marks the introduction of systems in which people with mental illnesses directly participate in and lead the previously expert-centered mental health system. However, it also reflects the fact that only a few of the comprehensive amendments originally proposed by the Coalition were passed.
      This study analyzes the revision process of the Mental Health Welfare Act using Kingdon's Multiple Streams Model to explore the decision-making processes and factors involved. The analysis revealed that the problem stream included national indicators reflected mental health policy issues, social incidents highlighting the shortcomings of current policies, and feedback on existing policies. In the political stream, there were policy recommendations from the National Human Rights Commission to the government, the Coalition for revision, legislators, public officials, and the medical community, legislative advocacy from organizations representing people with mental illnesses, and media coverage of violent crimes. Finally, the policy stream included government pilot projects, the second national mental health plan, proposals from coaliton advocating for comprehensive amendments, and legislative bills in the National Assembly. The policy leaders in the legislative process were the organizations representing people with mental illnesses and coalition for revision. Based on the research findings, the study suggests the need for proactive legislative advocacy, diverse discussions about policies, and institutional support for advocacy movements led by people with mental illness
      번역하기

      In December 2023, a partial amendment to the Mental Health Welfare Act was passed, introducing four new provisions: peer support, peer support shelters, procedural assistance, and adult guardianship. This is significant as it marks the introduction of...

      In December 2023, a partial amendment to the Mental Health Welfare Act was passed, introducing four new provisions: peer support, peer support shelters, procedural assistance, and adult guardianship. This is significant as it marks the introduction of systems in which people with mental illnesses directly participate in and lead the previously expert-centered mental health system. However, it also reflects the fact that only a few of the comprehensive amendments originally proposed by the Coalition were passed.
      This study analyzes the revision process of the Mental Health Welfare Act using Kingdon's Multiple Streams Model to explore the decision-making processes and factors involved. The analysis revealed that the problem stream included national indicators reflected mental health policy issues, social incidents highlighting the shortcomings of current policies, and feedback on existing policies. In the political stream, there were policy recommendations from the National Human Rights Commission to the government, the Coalition for revision, legislators, public officials, and the medical community, legislative advocacy from organizations representing people with mental illnesses, and media coverage of violent crimes. Finally, the policy stream included government pilot projects, the second national mental health plan, proposals from coaliton advocating for comprehensive amendments, and legislative bills in the National Assembly. The policy leaders in the legislative process were the organizations representing people with mental illnesses and coalition for revision. Based on the research findings, the study suggests the need for proactive legislative advocacy, diverse discussions about policies, and institutional support for advocacy movements led by people with mental illness

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼