중재와 처분권주의 = Arbitration and Principal of Disposition

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The initiation and termination of the arbitration procedure is left to the disposition of the party, but unlike in civil proceedings, the subject and scope of the arbitration are not necessarily left to the disposition of the party. Rather, because of the procedural nature of arbitration, a flexible decision considering equity can be made, allowing a considerable amount of freedom for the arbitral tribunal in terms of the subject and scope of the award or the granting of remedies. However, since the principal of disposition is applied to arbitration in a ‘relaxed’ form, the arbitral tribunal shall be bound to the purpose of the arbitration application and shall not arbitrarily violate the quantitative upper limit applied by the claimant. But to the extent that it is not an unexpected blow to the parties, the arbitral tribunal shall have the right to choose a remedy suitable for resolving the dispute resolution.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea(2018. 12. 13. 2018DA240387) confirmed that the declaratory award given to the claimant who sought the performance award was not a violation of the principal of disposition, but failed to provide specific criteria regarding the scope and limitations of the principal of disposition in arbitration.
In this thesis, I have made an exploratory attempt to establish the standards, and I hope that future research by academia on the relationship between arbitration and the principal of disposition will accumulate and reasonable standards of judgment will be formed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강수미, "중재판정의 효력에 관한 연구" 한국중재학회 27 (27): 59-84, 2017

2 전병서, "중재판정의 집행결정절차에 관한 검토" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 127-158, 2019

3 김갑유, "중재실무강의" 박영사 2017

4 민일영, "주석 민사집행법 제7권" 한국사법행정학회 2018

5 민일영, "주석 민사집행법 제6권" 한국사법행정학회 2018

6 민일영, "주석 민사소송법 제3권" 한국사법행정학회 2018

7 이봉민, "임시의 지위를 정하기 위한 가처분의 구체적 방법 및 주문에 관한 고찰 - 법원의 재량과 한계를 중심으로 -" 한국민사집행법학회 10 : 532-588, 2014

8 정영환, "신민사소송법" 법문사 2019

9 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2020

10 목영준, "상사중재법" 박영사 2018

11 "부동산등기실무 제1권" 법원행정처 2015

12 "법원실무제요 민사집행 제5권" 사법연수원 2020

13 김홍엽, "민사소송법" 박영사 2020

14 김경욱, "민사소송법" 법문사 2020

15 호문혁, "민사소송법" 법문사 2020

16 권창영, "민사보전" 한국사법행정학회 2018

17 임성우, "국제중재" 박영사 2016

18 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제4권" 박영사 [서울] 2007

19 瀨木比呂志, "民事保全法" 判例タイムズ社 2009

20 小島武司, "仲裁法: 注釋と論点" 靑林書院 2007

21 小島武司, "仲裁法" 日本評論社 2014

22 "Redfern and Hunter on international arbitration" Oxford University Press 2015

23 Gary B. Born, "International commercial arbitration Volume Ⅲ" Wolters Kluwer 2014