RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      From Hole to Whole: Rethinking Friday’s Tonguelessness in Coetzee’s Foe

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104926937

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In J. M. Coetzee’s Foe, Friday’s tonguelessness has been interpreted as a symptom of a victim/subaltern. As a victim/subaltern, Friday is often thought to symbolize a lack, which cannot be filled or represented through language. Thus, Friday’s tonguelessness has been considered to be a “hole” of the text, not only by Susan Barton but also by many postcolonial critics. However, what Friday’s tongueless mouth signifies is, this essay argues, by no means simple; instead, analyzing its significances presents a wholly different reading of Daniel Defoe’s canonical work as well as Coetzee’s text. According to this rereading, Friday’s tonguelessness, symbolized as the sunken ship the unnamed narrator of the final part dives into, reveals the hidden, painful, history of slavery and the Middle Passage. What Friday’s silence “speaks” disrupts the seemingly solid groundwork upon which Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and the western colonization and canonization have relied. This unburied truth of slave trade and colonization revises the sugar-coated stories of adventure and exploration, whether in literary canons or orthodox histories.
      번역하기

      In J. M. Coetzee’s Foe, Friday’s tonguelessness has been interpreted as a symptom of a victim/subaltern. As a victim/subaltern, Friday is often thought to symbolize a lack, which cannot be filled or represented through language. Thus, Friday’s t...

      In J. M. Coetzee’s Foe, Friday’s tonguelessness has been interpreted as a symptom of a victim/subaltern. As a victim/subaltern, Friday is often thought to symbolize a lack, which cannot be filled or represented through language. Thus, Friday’s tonguelessness has been considered to be a “hole” of the text, not only by Susan Barton but also by many postcolonial critics. However, what Friday’s tongueless mouth signifies is, this essay argues, by no means simple; instead, analyzing its significances presents a wholly different reading of Daniel Defoe’s canonical work as well as Coetzee’s text. According to this rereading, Friday’s tonguelessness, symbolized as the sunken ship the unnamed narrator of the final part dives into, reveals the hidden, painful, history of slavery and the Middle Passage. What Friday’s silence “speaks” disrupts the seemingly solid groundwork upon which Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and the western colonization and canonization have relied. This unburied truth of slave trade and colonization revises the sugar-coated stories of adventure and exploration, whether in literary canons or orthodox histories.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 MacLeod, Lewis, "‘Do We of Necessity Become Puppets in a Story?’ or Narrating the World: On Speech, Silence, and Discourse in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe" 52 (52): 1-18, 2006

      2 Bethlehem, Louise, "‘A Primary Need as Strong as Hunger’: The Rhetoric of Urgency in South African Literary Culture under Apartheid" 22 (22): 365-389, 2001

      3 Parry, Benita, "Writing South Africa" Cambridge University Press 149-165, 1998

      4 Chapman, Michael, "The Writing of Politics and the Politics of Writing: On Reading Dovey on Reading Lacan on Reading Coetzee on Reading . . . (?)" 4 (4): 327-341, 1988

      5 Ashcroft, Bill, "The Empire Writes Back" Routledge 1989

      6 JanMohamed, Abdul R., "The Economy of Manichean Allegory: The Function of Racial Difference in Colonialist Literature" 12 : 59-87, 1985

      7 Rickel, Jennifer, "Speaking of Human Rights: Narrative Voice and the Paradox of the Unspeakable in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe and Disgrace" 43 : 160-185, 2013

      8 Defoe, Daniel, "Robinson Crusoe" Norton 1975

      9 Macaskill, Brian, "Reading History, Writing Heresy:The Resistance of Representation and the Representation of Resistance in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe" 33 : 432-457, 1992

      10 Silvani, Roman, "Political Bodies and the Body Politic in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels" LIT 2012

      1 MacLeod, Lewis, "‘Do We of Necessity Become Puppets in a Story?’ or Narrating the World: On Speech, Silence, and Discourse in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe" 52 (52): 1-18, 2006

      2 Bethlehem, Louise, "‘A Primary Need as Strong as Hunger’: The Rhetoric of Urgency in South African Literary Culture under Apartheid" 22 (22): 365-389, 2001

      3 Parry, Benita, "Writing South Africa" Cambridge University Press 149-165, 1998

      4 Chapman, Michael, "The Writing of Politics and the Politics of Writing: On Reading Dovey on Reading Lacan on Reading Coetzee on Reading . . . (?)" 4 (4): 327-341, 1988

      5 Ashcroft, Bill, "The Empire Writes Back" Routledge 1989

      6 JanMohamed, Abdul R., "The Economy of Manichean Allegory: The Function of Racial Difference in Colonialist Literature" 12 : 59-87, 1985

      7 Rickel, Jennifer, "Speaking of Human Rights: Narrative Voice and the Paradox of the Unspeakable in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe and Disgrace" 43 : 160-185, 2013

      8 Defoe, Daniel, "Robinson Crusoe" Norton 1975

      9 Macaskill, Brian, "Reading History, Writing Heresy:The Resistance of Representation and the Representation of Resistance in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe" 33 : 432-457, 1992

      10 Silvani, Roman, "Political Bodies and the Body Politic in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels" LIT 2012

      11 Vaughan, Michael, "Literature and Politics: Currents in South African Writing in the Seventies" 9 : 118-138, 1982

      12 Attwell, David, "J. M. Coetzee’s Austerities" Ashgate 163-176, 2010

      13 Marais, Michael, "From the Standpoint of Redemption: Aesthetic Autonomy and Social Engagement in J. M. Coetzee’s Fiction and the Late Apartheid Period" 38 : 229-248, 2008

      14 Coetzee, John Maxwell, "Foe" Penguin 1986

      15 Coetzee, John Maxwell, "Doubling the Point: Essays and Interviews" Harvard University Press 1992

      16 Rich, Adrienne, "Diving into the Wreck: Poems 1971-1972" Norton 1972

      17 Dovey, Teresa, "Critical Essays on J. M. Coetzee" G. K. Hall and Co 18-28, 1998

      18 Korang, Kwaku Larbi, "Critical Essays on J. M. Coetzee" G. K. Hall and Co 180-197, 1998

      19 Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, "Consequences of Theory, edited by Jonathan Arac and Barbara Johnson" Johns Hopkins University Press 154-180, 1991

      20 Rich, Paul, "Apartheid and the Decline of the Civilization Idea: An Essay on Nadine Gordimer’s July’s People and J. M. Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians" 15 : 365-393, 1984

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.39
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.35 0.712 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼