러시아 기록관리제도에 관한 연구 : 근대기록관리제도의 형성과정과 동인을 중심으로 = A Study on the Formation of the Modern Archival System in Russia

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper the author tries to pin point the prime driving factor which had enabled the Imperial Russia to have modern archives in the late 19th century. Many a scholar have thought that the Western Modern Archival System was the ultimate model for the russian archives and it was the very help of the western scholars that made the modern archives possible in the Russian territory. But to the contrary, it was not the western influence but the internal russian technologies developed by the russian archivists which made the modern archival system possible in the Russia.
In the first chapter, the author describes the purpose of this paper as 'to reveal the real driving force' which made the Russian Modern Archival System possible about 100 years ago.
In the second chapter, the author sets the logic of this paper to understand what modernity is in the archival field. To admit historical values of the archives is the first factor which can make a real modern archival system. To have a free access to the archival fonds and to let all the members of the society to use the archives are the second condition to make a modernity accomplished in the archival field. To have the proper law foundation to manage the archives is the third fact which can define modern archives.
In the third chapter, the author explains the characteristics of the archives before Peter the great. The author points out the Prikaz archives of the Ivan IV were the dividing places of the old church archives(10-15 centuries) and prikaz archives(16-17 centuries).
In the forth chapter, the author explains the beginning of the modern archival system with the archival decrees of the Perter I in the years of 1711 and 1712. And after that the author shows a set of russian archivists who had contributed the building of modern archival system. It was the Kalachov who finally had made the russian modern archival system at least in a form of pure theory in the late 19 century. The author devotes more than 12 pages to explain the activities of the archivist, Kalachov in detail. The author thinks that the archival systems of the Soviet Union and Russian Federation in the 20th century was the continuations of the modern archival system of the late 19th century. And the author thinks that the Russian Federation gets the direct inheritance of the Imperial Russian Modern Archives Heritages of the 19th century.
In the conclusion, the authors stresses that the two developments of modern archival systems in the Soviet union and Russian Federation are not more than the two different faces derived from the heritage of the 19th century modernity in the imperial russian archives. The study of the russian archives helps to find the historical material to understand the Korean History of the 19th and 20th centuries, too.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구배경과 목적 = 1
• 2. 연구내용과 방법 = 4
• 3. 선행연구 분석 = 5
• 4. 연구의의와 한계 = 12
• Ⅱ. 기록관리제도사 시대구분과 근대성의 개념 = 14
• 1. 기록관리제도사의 시대구분 유형 = 14
• 1) 전통적인 시대구분론 = 14
• 2) 시대구분의 새로운 시도 = 15
• 2. 기록관리제도사의 시대구분과 근대성의 개념 = 19
• 1) 근대성의 주요 요소 = 19
• 2) 근대성의 개념과 시대구분 = 22
• Ⅲ. 전근대적 기록관리제도의 전개 = 25
• 1. 시대 개관 = 25
• 2. 고대 기록관(10-15세기) = 27
• 3. 이반Ⅳ세의 프리카즈 기록관(16-17세기) = 34
• 1) 기록관의 성격 = 34
• 2) 3대 프리카즈 기록관 = 36
• (1) 토지관리부 기록관(Arkhiv Pomestnogo prikaza) = 37
• (2) 외무부 기록관(Arkhiv Posol'skogo prikaza) = 39
• (3) 총무·법무·국방부 기록관(Arkhiv Razrjadnogo prikaza) = 41
• 3) 기록관의 운영주체와 아키비스트 = 42
• Ⅳ. 근대 기록관리제도의 형성과 발전 = 45
• 1. 시대 개관 = 45
• 2. 표트르대제와 근대 기록관리제도 도입(18세기) = 46
• 1) 표트르대제의 개혁 = 46
• 2) 기록관리제도의 법률적인 토대 = 47
• 3) 기록물의 역사적 가치 인식 = 49
• 4) 개혁법안에 대한 상반된 평가 = 51
• 5) 표트르대제 개혁의 의의 = 53
• 3. 근대 기록관리제도의 정착(18세기 초-19세기 말) = 53
• 1) 다양한 분류 방식의 개발 = 53
• 2) 대표적인 아키비스트들과 주요 활동내역 = 55
• 3) 칼라쵸프의 개혁과 근대 기록관리제도의 성립 = 62
• (1) 칼라쵸프 개혁이론의 주요내용 = 62
• (2) 칼라쵸프 개혁안의 정책화 추진과정 = 67
• (3) 중앙기록관리위원회(Gak) = 70
• 4. 근대기록관리제도로의 발전(20세기) = 72
• 1) 소비에트 연방 : 전제적 중앙통제 기록관리체제의 강화 = 73
• 2) 러시아 연방 : 민주적 기록관리제도로의 이행 = 78
• Ⅴ. 결론 = 82
• 1. 요약 = 82
• 2. 제언 = 84
• 참고문헌 = 85
• Abstract = 91