RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      社會事業機關에서의 保護觀察制度 = Social Welfare Agency as a Probation System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A328451

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article is aimed toward finding how a probation system and methods can be applied to a social work agency, in particular community welfare center. This investigation is composed of the following three parts : the general understanding of probation system, the position and role of social work I probation systems, and the participation of community welfare centers in probation practice.
      To this end I describe the history and practice of the probation system in such countries as the United States, England, and Japan. Then I examine how a social work agency can accomplish its own probationary function in Korea in three perspectives.
      First, it is desirable for aprivate agency to be to some extent in charge of probation practice because probation systems hardly seem to be worked out well under the control of the government. It's program has to be originated and administered by private agencies but financed by the public. Second, it is advisable that probation programs be changed. They have been oriented to work training, but they should be turned into counseling for jobs, strengthening the relationship between the ex-criminal sand business bommunity, and having seminars so that citizens and employers are willing to accept the disadvantaged people. Lastly, probation systems must be privately run in terms of selecting professional workers. The government has strict regulations on employing experts. Therefore, social work agencies are encouraged to take charge of probation for choosing proper personnel because correction work with human beings usually on one's basic values and philosophy.
      번역하기

      This article is aimed toward finding how a probation system and methods can be applied to a social work agency, in particular community welfare center. This investigation is composed of the following three parts : the general understanding of probatio...

      This article is aimed toward finding how a probation system and methods can be applied to a social work agency, in particular community welfare center. This investigation is composed of the following three parts : the general understanding of probation system, the position and role of social work I probation systems, and the participation of community welfare centers in probation practice.
      To this end I describe the history and practice of the probation system in such countries as the United States, England, and Japan. Then I examine how a social work agency can accomplish its own probationary function in Korea in three perspectives.
      First, it is desirable for aprivate agency to be to some extent in charge of probation practice because probation systems hardly seem to be worked out well under the control of the government. It's program has to be originated and administered by private agencies but financed by the public. Second, it is advisable that probation programs be changed. They have been oriented to work training, but they should be turned into counseling for jobs, strengthening the relationship between the ex-criminal sand business bommunity, and having seminars so that citizens and employers are willing to accept the disadvantaged people. Lastly, probation systems must be privately run in terms of selecting professional workers. The government has strict regulations on employing experts. Therefore, social work agencies are encouraged to take charge of probation for choosing proper personnel because correction work with human beings usually on one's basic values and philosophy.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • <目次> = 129
      • Ⅰ. 序 論 =129
      • Ⅱ. 各國의 保護觀察制度 = 130
      • 1. 美國 = 131
      • 2. 英國 = 132
      • <目次> = 129
      • Ⅰ. 序 論 =129
      • Ⅱ. 各國의 保護觀察制度 = 130
      • 1. 美國 = 131
      • 2. 英國 = 132
      • 3. 日本 = 133
      • Ⅲ. 保護觀察에서의 社會事業의 地位와 役割 = 136
      • 1. 保護觀察官의 職務 = 136
      • 2. 社會事業과 保護觀察 = 137
      • 3. 社會事業家의 地位와 役割 = 139
      • Ⅳ. 社會福祉館의 保護觀察實施를 위한 接近 = 141
      • 1. 必要性 = 142
      • 2. 目的 = 143
      • 3. 事業의 對象 = 144
      • 4. 保護의 方法 = 145
      • 5. 保護의 內容 = 146
      • 6. Worker의 業務 = 149
      • Ⅴ. 結 論 = 149
      • Abstract = 152
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼