RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      DMZ 세계유산 등재 논의 성과와 과제: 남북 문화유산 정책포럼을 중심으로 = DMZ World Heritage List Discussion Results and Challenges: Focusing on the North-South Korean Cltural Heritage Policy Forum

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106980341

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article was written to promote exchanges and cooperation between the two Koreas based on their understanding of the cultural heritage of the two Koreas. The DMZ is the last existing Cold War heritage and a living war heritage. At the same time, as a result of the 70-year-old Cold War, it has outstanding universal value in that it is a monumental legacy of the Korean Peninsula’s ecosystem and biodiversity conservation. Despite the value of the DMZ that the Korean Peninsula has, there are many differences in the perception between the two Koreas. While South Korea wants to use the DMZ as a springboard for peace on the Korean Peninsula, North Korea sees the DMZ as something that needs to be removed for unification. This fact is an important task to overcome before promoting the registration of the DMZ as a World Heritage Site. We may have focused only on the establishment of a peace zone for the registration of world heritage rather than on dreaming of the past, present and future values of the DMZ. It seems that serious and open discussions on “What is the DMZ for us?” and “How should we look at the DMZ?” and “How should we interpret the DMZ?” are needed before pushing for the DMZ’s World Heritage site with a long breath away from the short-term temptation.
      번역하기

      This article was written to promote exchanges and cooperation between the two Koreas based on their understanding of the cultural heritage of the two Koreas. The DMZ is the last existing Cold War heritage and a living war heritage. At the same time, a...

      This article was written to promote exchanges and cooperation between the two Koreas based on their understanding of the cultural heritage of the two Koreas. The DMZ is the last existing Cold War heritage and a living war heritage. At the same time, as a result of the 70-year-old Cold War, it has outstanding universal value in that it is a monumental legacy of the Korean Peninsula’s ecosystem and biodiversity conservation. Despite the value of the DMZ that the Korean Peninsula has, there are many differences in the perception between the two Koreas. While South Korea wants to use the DMZ as a springboard for peace on the Korean Peninsula, North Korea sees the DMZ as something that needs to be removed for unification. This fact is an important task to overcome before promoting the registration of the DMZ as a World Heritage Site. We may have focused only on the establishment of a peace zone for the registration of world heritage rather than on dreaming of the past, present and future values of the DMZ. It seems that serious and open discussions on “What is the DMZ for us?” and “How should we look at the DMZ?” and “How should we interpret the DMZ?” are needed before pushing for the DMZ’s World Heritage site with a long breath away from the short-term temptation.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼