관형사절의 ‘-더-’에 대하여 = Study on a Relative Clause ‘-더-’

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is focused on the functional meaning of ‘-더-’ that is integrated into a relative clause. ‘-더-’ of the relative clause is always integrated into ‘-은’ and used as the form of ‘-던’. Therefore, the study has tried to explain the functional meaning of ‘-은’ by analyzing ‘-더-’ and ‘-은’ and then analyze the functional meaning of ‘-더-’ based on the reason that ‘-은’ has some restrictions when it is integrated with ‘-었-’ or ‘–겠-’.
The relativizer ‘-은’ shows that the event of a relative clause precedes the event and utterance time of the main clause or precedes either of the two. And it has no relations with tense or aspect. The relative clause combined with ‘-은’ does not integrate ‘-었-’ or ‘-겠-’ without ‘-더-’. Therefore any pre-final ending cannot be combined before ‘-은’. ‘-었-’ or ‘-겠-’ can be combined only before ‘-던’.
‘-더-’ of ‘-던’ can be integrated when the event of the relative clause and the event of the main clause can be divided. In ‘-더-’ integration, the meaning logic can be explained only in the order of ‘E1 > E2 > U’ or ‘E2 > E1 > U’.
The functional meaning of ‘-더-’ integrated into a relative clause can be explained as ‘a psychological distance in utterance time’ about the event that the speaker perceived before the utterance time. ‘-더-’ of the main clause shows pragmatic meaning through ‘the psychological distance in utterance time,’ but because the relative clause does not suppose the listener, it shows ‘the psychological distance’ to expose different aspect or modality from that of the main clause.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장 경희, "현대국어의 양태범주 연구" 탑출판사 1985

2 장 광군, "한국어 연결어미의 표현론" 월인 1999

3 신 현숙, "의미 분석의 방법과 실제" 한국문화사 1986

4 최 현배, "우리말본" 정음문화사 1983

5 송재영, "연결 어미 ‘-더니’ 연구" 국어학회 (53) : 177-198, 2008

6 송 재목, "안맺음씨끝 ‘-더-’의 의미 기능에 대하여" 국어학회 32 : 135-169, 1998

7 김수태, "안맺음씨끝 ‘-더-’의 기능의미" 우리말학회 (32) : 5-38, 2013

8 서 정수, "눈뫼 허 웅 박사 환갑 기념 논문집" 231-265, 1978

9 박 재연, "국어학총서" 국어학회 2006

10 문 숙영, "국어학총서" 국어학회 2009

11 임 홍빈, "국어문법의 심층" 태학사 1998

12 남 기심, "국어문법의 시제문제에 관한 연구" 탑출판사 1978

13 임 홍빈, "국어문법론 (Ⅰ)" 방송통신대학 출판부 1995

14 김 차균, "국어 시제 형태의 의미" 한글학회 169 : 45-116, 1990

15 崔東柱, "국어 시상체계의 통시적 변화에 관한 연구" 서울大學校 大學院 1995

16 김 창섭, "국어 관형절의 과거 시제" 전북대학교 어학연구소 14 : 95-117, 1987

17 서 정수, "‘더’는 회상의 기능을 지니는가?" 한국언어학회 2 (2): 97-127, 1977

18 이 창덕, "‘-더-’에 관한 문제" 연세대학교 한국어학당 13 : 195-218, 1988

19 李潤夏, "{-더-}와 自覺" 한국어문교육연구회 29 (29): 5-36, 2001

20 Comrie, B., "Tense" Cambridge University Press 1985