RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      정당 내부 질서의 법적 규제 = The Legal Regulation of the Political Party's Internal Structure

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106181269

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Democracy is built on the principle of competition. So meaningful elections can only take place when voters are given a choice between policies, programs, and candidates. Political parties provide this choice by aggregating interests, nominating candidates, mobilizing the electorate, managing campaigns, and organizing the government. Parties out of power play an equally important role. They keep the ruling party honest by scrutinizing its policies, auditing its behavior, demanding transparency, insisting on accountability, and advancing an alternative agenda, all in the interest of responsible party government.
      To fulfill these functions, the political parties must have democratic internal structures as well as democratic goals and activities. Viewed in this light, we should regulate parties that have undemocratic internal structures. But considering the value of party’s autonomy and pluralistic party system, there is a limit in imposing on political parties a legal duty to democratize their internal structures. Therefore, we must interpret democracy narrowly with regard to the political party's internal democracy. Particularly in cases of party dissolution, the courts should demand on parties only the cores of internal democracy, such as equal voting rights and free speech for members of party, open and periodical elections for party leaders, Party's administration in a transparent way.
      번역하기

      Democracy is built on the principle of competition. So meaningful elections can only take place when voters are given a choice between policies, programs, and candidates. Political parties provide this choice by aggregating interests, nominating candi...

      Democracy is built on the principle of competition. So meaningful elections can only take place when voters are given a choice between policies, programs, and candidates. Political parties provide this choice by aggregating interests, nominating candidates, mobilizing the electorate, managing campaigns, and organizing the government. Parties out of power play an equally important role. They keep the ruling party honest by scrutinizing its policies, auditing its behavior, demanding transparency, insisting on accountability, and advancing an alternative agenda, all in the interest of responsible party government.
      To fulfill these functions, the political parties must have democratic internal structures as well as democratic goals and activities. Viewed in this light, we should regulate parties that have undemocratic internal structures. But considering the value of party’s autonomy and pluralistic party system, there is a limit in imposing on political parties a legal duty to democratize their internal structures. Therefore, we must interpret democracy narrowly with regard to the political party's internal democracy. Particularly in cases of party dissolution, the courts should demand on parties only the cores of internal democracy, such as equal voting rights and free speech for members of party, open and periodical elections for party leaders, Party's administration in a transparent way.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정만희, "헌법과 통치구조" 법문사 2003

      2 콘라드 헷세, "통일 독일헌법원론(제20판)" 박영사 2001

      3 장영수, "정당의 헌법적 기능과 당내민주주의" 한국공법학회 25 (25): 1995

      4 강승식, "미국헌법학강의" 궁리출판사 2007

      5 권영호, "독일정당의 내부질서에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 2002

      6 방승주, "권력구조의 민주화와 정당-야당기능의 활성화와 당내민주주의를 중심으로-" 한국헌법학회 8 (8): 2002

      7 Yanai, Nathan, "Why Do Political Parties Survive" (5) : 1999

      8 Muddle, Cas, "The Paradox Of The Anti-Party Party" (265) : 1996

      9 Kommers, Donald P, "The Constitutional Jurisprudence of The Federal Republic of Germany(2d ed.)" Duke University Press 1997

      10 Issacharoff, Samuel, "Politics As Markets: Partisan Lockups of Democratic Process" (643) : 1998

      1 정만희, "헌법과 통치구조" 법문사 2003

      2 콘라드 헷세, "통일 독일헌법원론(제20판)" 박영사 2001

      3 장영수, "정당의 헌법적 기능과 당내민주주의" 한국공법학회 25 (25): 1995

      4 강승식, "미국헌법학강의" 궁리출판사 2007

      5 권영호, "독일정당의 내부질서에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 2002

      6 방승주, "권력구조의 민주화와 정당-야당기능의 활성화와 당내민주주의를 중심으로-" 한국헌법학회 8 (8): 2002

      7 Yanai, Nathan, "Why Do Political Parties Survive" (5) : 1999

      8 Muddle, Cas, "The Paradox Of The Anti-Party Party" (265) : 1996

      9 Kommers, Donald P, "The Constitutional Jurisprudence of The Federal Republic of Germany(2d ed.)" Duke University Press 1997

      10 Issacharoff, Samuel, "Politics As Markets: Partisan Lockups of Democratic Process" (643) : 1998

      11 Duverger, Maurice trans, "Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state" Harper & Row 1972

      12 Beyme, Klaus Von, "Political Parties in Western Democracies" St. Martin’s Press 1985

      13 Gunther, Richard, "Political Parties and Democracy" Johns Hopkins University Press 2001

      14 Holocombe, G, "Political Parties And Legislative Principal-Agent Relationship" (669) : 1989

      15 Sartori, Giovanni, "Parties and Party Systems" Cambridge University Press 1976

      16 Avnon, Dan, "Parties Laws in Democratic Systems of Government" 283 : 1995

      17 Esplugas, Pierre, "L'intrediction des partis politiques" (675) : 1998

      18 Kirchhof, Paul, "Germany and It's Basic Law, Nomos" Cambridge University Press 2000

      19 Robbers, Gerhard, "Encyclopedia of World Constitutions(Vol. Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ), Facts on File"

      20 Hazan,Reuven Y, "Elections and Cleavages" Frank Cass Publishers 2000

      21 Koelble, Thomas A, "Economic Theories Of Organization And Politics Of Institutional Design In Political Parties" (251) : 1996

      22 Black, Benjamin D, "Developments In The State Regulation Of Major And Minor Political Parties" 109 : 1996

      23 Gardner, James A, "Can Party Politics be Virtuous? Symposium: Law and Political Parties" (667) : 2000

      24 Rosenblum. Nancy L, ""Extremism" And Anti Extremism In American Party Politics" (843) : 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
      2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼