Safety Culture Assessment in Petrochemical Industry: A Comparative Study of Two Algerian Plants

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background: To elucidate the relationship between safety culture maturity and safety performance of a particular company.

Methods: To identify the factors that contribute to a safety culture, a survey questionnaire was created based mainly on the studies of Fernández-Muñiz et al. The survey was randomly distributed to 1000 employees of two oil companies and realized a rate of valid answer of 51%. Minitab 16 software was used and diverse tests, including the descriptive statistical analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, mean analysis, and correlation, were used for the analysis of data. Ten factors were extracted using the analysis of factor to represent safety culture and safety performance.

Results: The results of this study showed that the managers’ commitment, training, incentives, communication, and employee involvement are the priority domains on which it is necessary to stress the effort of improvement, where they had all the descriptive average values lower than 3.0 at the level of Company B. Furthermore, the results also showed that the safety culture influences the safety performance of the company. Therefore, Company A with a good safety culture (the descriptive average values more than 4.0), is more successful than Company B in terms of accident rates.

Conclusion: The comparison between the two petrochemical plants of the group Sonatrach confirms these results in which Company A, the managers of which are English and Norwegian, distinguishes itself by the maturity of their safety culture has significantly higher evaluations than the company B, who is constituted of Algerian staff, in terms of safety management practices and safety performance.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Cooper MD, "Towards a model of safety culture" 36 : 111-136, 2000

2 ACSNI Human Factors Study Group, "Third report: organising for safety, advisory committee on the safety of nuclear installations. Health and Safety Commission" HMSO 1993

3 Cox S, "The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example" 5 : 93-104, 1991

4 Guldenmund FW, "The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research" 34 : 215-257, 2000

5 Neal A, "The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior" 34 : 99-109, 2000

6 Borman WC, "Task performance and contextual performance: the meaning for personnel selection research" 10 : 99-109, 1997

7 International Atomic Energy Agency, "Summary report on the Post Accident review meeting on the Chernobyl Accident" 106-, 1986

8 Vinodkumar MN, "Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation, 2010 mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation" 42 : 2082-2093, 2010

9 Cox S, "Safety culture: philosopher’s stone or man of straw?" 12 : 189-201, 1998

10 Fernández-Muñiz B, "Safety culture: analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions" 38 : 627-641, 2007

11 Von Thaden TL, "Safety culture in a regional airline: results from a commercial aviation safety survey" 2003

12 Carroll JS, "Safety culture as an ongoing process: culture surveys as opportunities for enquiry and change" 12 : 272-284, 1998

13 Pidgeon NF, "Safety culture and risk management in organizations" 22 : 129-140, 1991

14 Baram M, "Safety culture and behavioral change at the workplace" 45 : 631-636, 2007

15 Zohar D, "Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications" 65 : 96-102, 1980

16 Siu O, "Safety climate and safety performance among construction workers in Hong Kong: the role of psychological strains as mediators" 36 : 359-366, 2004

17 Wilpert B, "Safety Culture in Nuclear Power Plant" Taylor & Francis 5-18, 2001

18 Griffin MA, "Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, 2000 safety performance, knowledge, and motivation" 5 : 347-358, 2000

19 Cooper MD, "Improving safety culture: a practical guide" Wiley J 255-, 1998

20 Cooper MD, "Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship" 35 : 497-512, 2004

21 Lefranc G, "Does the management of regulatory compliance and occupational risk have an impact on safety culture?" PSAM11 & ESREL 2012

22 Hagan PE, "Accident prevention manual for business and industry" National Safety Council 2001

23 Neal A, "A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels" 91 : 946-953, 2006

24 Dedobbeleer N, "A safety climate measure for construction sites" 22 : 97-103, 1991

25 Zohar D, "A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on micro accidents in manufacturing jobs" 85 : 587-596, 2000

26 Hofmann DA, "A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents personnel" 49 : 307-339, 1996