To evaluate etanercept in patients from Latin America, Central/Eastern Europe, and Asia with non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr‐axSpA). A subset analysis was performed on nr‐axSpA patients from Argentina, Colombia, the Czech Republic, ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O120511924
2018년
-
1756-1841
1756-185X
SCOPUS;SCIE
학술저널
1443-1451 [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
To evaluate etanercept in patients from Latin America, Central/Eastern Europe, and Asia with non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr‐axSpA). A subset analysis was performed on nr‐axSpA patients from Argentina, Colombia, the Czech Republic, ...
To evaluate etanercept in patients from Latin America, Central/Eastern Europe, and Asia with non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr‐axSpA).
A subset analysis was performed on nr‐axSpA patients from Argentina, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Russia and Taiwan who were enrolled in EMBARK (NCT01258738). Patients received either etanercept 50 mg or placebo once weekly. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving 40% improvement from baseline based on Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. Secondary endpoints included other efficacy assessments, health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and safety.
Of the 117 patients in this subset, 59 were treated with etanercept and 58 received placebo. At week 12, numerically greater improvements from baseline were observed for all efficacy endpoints in etanercept‐treated patients compared with those receiving placebo. Statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups were observed for proportion of patients achieving ASAS40 (P = 0.0413, at week 8), ASAS5/6 (P = 0.0126), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score ‐ C‐reactive protein (CRP) inactive disease (P = 0.0093), Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliac joint scores (P = 0.0014), high‐sensitivity CRP (P=0.032), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = 0.0082). Statistically significant improvements in the etanercept‐treated group compared with placebo group were observed for nocturnal back pain (P = 0.040), total back pain (P = 0.025), physician global assessment of disease (P = 0.023), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire percent impairment while working (P = 0.047). Adverse events were similar between the two treatment groups.
In this subset of patients with nr‐axSpA from Latin America, Central/Eastern Europe, and Asia, treatment with etanercept, compared with placebo, resulted in improved disease symptoms and patient HRQoL. Etanercept was well tolerated.