「類義評例」에 나타난 「大學衍義」의 교감에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Correction of Daehagkyeonui in Yuuipyeongrye

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study analyzes the opinions of Seo, Hyung-soo and Yoon, Gwang-an, the proofreaders of Daehagkyeonui in Yuuipyeongrye, and how the decision-making process of Jeongjo was made in detail, using literature and actual research. The detailed contents and results of the proofreaders were examined through comparison with the original records of Daehagkyeonui and Eojeongdaehakyuui.
As a result of the analysis, the proofreaders Hyungsu Seo and Gwangan Yoon very actively participated in the correction and expressed their opinions, and King Jeongjo’s decision was delicate yet firm. Volume 1/4 items, Volume 2/5 items, Volume 3/6 items, Volume 4/13 items, Volume 5/12 items, Volume 6/3 items, Volume 7/7 items, a total of 8 Volumes 56 items. In the case of correctional content, the format of Eojeongdaehakyuui was established by coordinating each other’s opinions, and the doctrines of Sunhwang and Yang Woong were deleted as they were heresy, and standards for selecting scriptures and historical books were established. As the proofreading was carried out based on the draft proof that King Jeongjo had already made, addition of the contents was not made except in cases where it was particularly insignificant. If a letter was found to be an incorrect letter, it was given priority to follow the sentence of the original text. All cases of eunuchs were deleted on the grounds that they should not be entrusted with politics. As a result of editing 56 items, there were 8 items for Jeongjo’s sole opinion, 2 items for Seo, Hyung-soo alone, 26 items for Yoon, Kwang-an alone, and 18 items for Seo, Hyung-soo and Yoon, Kwang-an jointly. In each volume, 2 or more opinions were presented for 1 item, for a total of 2 items.
This study obtained very significant results in the fields of bibliography, records management and history. It is expected that this result will be used as basic data for those who study the history of literature during the Jeong and Sunjo period.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김철호, "호굉과 주희의 성선(性善) 해석 비교" 철학연구소 (32) : 29-64, 2006

2 신영주, "한문 문헌에 대한 교감의 전통과 그 유형에 관하여 - 몇 가지 사례를 중심으로-" 한국한문고전학회 17 (17): 311-340, 2008

3 "한국고전번역원"

4 劉鳳學, "풍석(楓石)서유구(徐有榘)의 학문과 사상" 6 : 129-158, 2010

5 강순애, "정조가 홍낙임에게 보낸 어찰에 나타난 어정서 편찬․간행 및 반사 내용과 관련 기록 연구 - 두보, 육유 및 주자 저술의 선집을 중심으로 -" 한국서지학회 (77) : 103-124, 2019

6 김용천, "전한 선제시대의 전례논쟁과 후대의 예학적 평가" 신라문화연구소 (28) : 343-368, 2006

7 김병섭 편, "대학연의 : 리더십을 말하다, 상․중․하" 서울대학교출판부 2018

8 "규장각한국학연구"

9 김문식, "正祖의 帝王學과 『大學類義』 편찬" 규장각한국학연구원 (21) : 59-81, 1998

10 강순애, "御定大學類義 의 편찬과 간행 및 반사에 관한 연구" 한국서지학회 (85) : 5-35, 2021

11 소진형, "17세기 황극(皇極) 해석과 왕권론 비교연구: 윤휴와 박세채의 황극에 대한 이론적 해석을 중심으로" 한국정치연구소 29 (29): 31-64, 2020