RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      職場の食事勧誘過程における会話上の役割交渉 - 3名の調査協力者を対象とした質的分析より

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aims to seek an explanation for Japanese <interaction competence> used individually and some idea of <conversational negotiation or role negotiation> with focus on lunch solicitation process performed by three Korean business personnel (hereafter called KB1, KB2 and KB3) working at aJapanese company. Towards this end, an analytical review was performed using an analytical approach after the transcription of the interaction interview with each individual. The results showed that as for KB1, his accumulated socio-cultural knowledge andinformation ranging from the media to entertainment and cosmetics facilitated conversational negotiation(<CN-PM><CN-IM><CN-EX>) regarding <meaning in language>, <meaning of interaction> and <professional knowledge>. During this process, <frame of a privately close relationship> was formed, while exchanging meta-message of <hope> on the meal. At the same time、the negotiations for potential roles of <solicitor(KB1)> and <solicitee(peer)> were found to have a positive influence on the solicitation process. Next it seemed difficult for KB2 to take solicitation action due to the stress caused by the different perception on the priority between a work and a meal with peers. With respect to the relief of the stress, it is possible to relieve the stress if the negotiation (CN-EX) for mutual understanding is performed by narrowing down the different mutual recognition mentioned above. Lastly, KB3 was observed to display <give-and-take solicitation> by confirmation strategies on the selection of food and restaurants, and <guess-based solicitation> by the consideration of conditions. In addition to the common approach (CN-IM) both by verbal and non-verbal elements, it was observed that especially in the latter, KB3 and his peers performed solicitation action by taking turns about the conversation role negotiation of <solicitor> and <solicitee>, while forming <frame of comparable and private peer relationship> by the consideration of conditions.
      번역하기

      This study aims to seek an explanation for Japanese <interaction competence> used individually and some idea of <conversational negotiation or role negotiation> with focus on lunch solicitation process performed by three Korean business ...

      This study aims to seek an explanation for Japanese <interaction competence> used individually and some idea of <conversational negotiation or role negotiation> with focus on lunch solicitation process performed by three Korean business personnel (hereafter called KB1, KB2 and KB3) working at aJapanese company. Towards this end, an analytical review was performed using an analytical approach after the transcription of the interaction interview with each individual. The results showed that as for KB1, his accumulated socio-cultural knowledge andinformation ranging from the media to entertainment and cosmetics facilitated conversational negotiation(<CN-PM><CN-IM><CN-EX>) regarding <meaning in language>, <meaning of interaction> and <professional knowledge>. During this process, <frame of a privately close relationship> was formed, while exchanging meta-message of <hope> on the meal. At the same time、the negotiations for potential roles of <solicitor(KB1)> and <solicitee(peer)> were found to have a positive influence on the solicitation process. Next it seemed difficult for KB2 to take solicitation action due to the stress caused by the different perception on the priority between a work and a meal with peers. With respect to the relief of the stress, it is possible to relieve the stress if the negotiation (CN-EX) for mutual understanding is performed by narrowing down the different mutual recognition mentioned above. Lastly, KB3 was observed to display <give-and-take solicitation> by confirmation strategies on the selection of food and restaurants, and <guess-based solicitation> by the consideration of conditions. In addition to the common approach (CN-IM) both by verbal and non-verbal elements, it was observed that especially in the latter, KB3 and his peers performed solicitation action by taking turns about the conversation role negotiation of <solicitor> and <solicitee>, while forming <frame of comparable and private peer relationship> by the consideration of conditions.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 本研究の背景と目的
      • 2. 主題語の相関関係
      • 2.1 インターアクション能力と食事勧誘行動
      • 2.2 会話上の交渉及び会話上の役割交渉
      • 3. 先行研究
      • 1. 本研究の背景と目的
      • 2. 主題語の相関関係
      • 2.1 インターアクション能力と食事勧誘行動
      • 2.2 会話上の交渉及び会話上の役割交渉
      • 3. 先行研究
      • 4. 調査概要
      • 4.1 データ収集方法及び協力者
      • 4.2 分析方法及び理論的枠組み
      • 5. 調査結果
      • 6. KB1にみられる食事勧誘時の会話上の交渉や役割交渉
      • 6.1 社会文化的文脈の理解
      • 6.2 分析
      • 6.3 考察
      • 7. KB2にみられる食事勧誘時の会話上の交渉や役割交渉
      • 7.1 社会文化的文脈の理解
      • 7.2 分析
      • 7.3 考察
      • 8. KB3にみられる食事勧誘時の会話上の交渉や役割交渉
      • 8.1 社会文化的文脈の理解
      • 8.2 分析
      • 8.3 考察
      • 9. まとめと今後の課題
      • 參考文獻
      • <要旨>
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 村岡英裕, "「日本語総合シラバスの構築と教材開発指針の作成」論文集第3巻日本語教育の社会文化能力" 458-495, 2003

      2 鄭圭弼, "韓日ビジネス場面における日本語のインターアクション行動―実質行動の遂行過程に関する実証的研究―" Gworld 2013

      3 정규필, "異文化間職務遂行におけるインターアクション ―韓国人ビジネス関係者を対象としたインタビューから―" 한국일본어교육학회 (51) : 113-126, 2010

      4 大崎正瑠, "日韓異文化コミュニケーションの一研究-在韓国日系企業のアンケート調査より" 東京経済大学コミュニケーション学会 (24) : 2006

      5 鄭圭弼, "日韓ビジネス上の打ち合わせ場面における会話参加者間の役割交渉" 山形大学 152-157, 2008

      6 ネウストプニー.J.V, "日本研究の方法論―データ収集の段階" 1-24, 1994

      7 近藤彩, "日本人と外国人のビジネス・コミュニケーションに関する実証研究" ひつじ書房 2007

      8 宮副ウォン裕子, "接触場面と日本語教育:ネウストプニーのインパクト" 明治書院 165-184, 2003

      9 鄭圭弼, "接触場面での日本語のインターアクション行動―学内と学外に着目して―" 立教大学 57-68, 2013

      10 宮副ウォン裕子, "多言語職場の会話上の役割交渉" 横浜国立大学 195-200, 2005

      1 村岡英裕, "「日本語総合シラバスの構築と教材開発指針の作成」論文集第3巻日本語教育の社会文化能力" 458-495, 2003

      2 鄭圭弼, "韓日ビジネス場面における日本語のインターアクション行動―実質行動の遂行過程に関する実証的研究―" Gworld 2013

      3 정규필, "異文化間職務遂行におけるインターアクション ―韓国人ビジネス関係者を対象としたインタビューから―" 한국일본어교육학회 (51) : 113-126, 2010

      4 大崎正瑠, "日韓異文化コミュニケーションの一研究-在韓国日系企業のアンケート調査より" 東京経済大学コミュニケーション学会 (24) : 2006

      5 鄭圭弼, "日韓ビジネス上の打ち合わせ場面における会話参加者間の役割交渉" 山形大学 152-157, 2008

      6 ネウストプニー.J.V, "日本研究の方法論―データ収集の段階" 1-24, 1994

      7 近藤彩, "日本人と外国人のビジネス・コミュニケーションに関する実証研究" ひつじ書房 2007

      8 宮副ウォン裕子, "接触場面と日本語教育:ネウストプニーのインパクト" 明治書院 165-184, 2003

      9 鄭圭弼, "接触場面での日本語のインターアクション行動―学内と学外に着目して―" 立教大学 57-68, 2013

      10 宮副ウォン裕子, "多言語職場の会話上の役割交渉" 横浜国立大学 195-200, 2005

      11 清ルミ, "外国人社員と日本人社員-日本語によるコミュニケーションを阻むもの" (10) : 57-73, 1997

      12 島田めぐみ, "外国人ビジネス関係者の日本語使用―実態と企業からの要望―" (8) : 121-140, 1998

      13 ネウストプニー.J.V, "外国人とのコミュニケーション" 岩波書店 1982

      14 箕浦康子, "フィールドワークの技法と実際マイクロ・エスノグラフィー入門" ミネルヴァ書房 1999

      15 ザトラウスキー, "インターアクションの社会言語学" 13 (13): 40-51, 1994

      16 ネウストプニー.J.V., "インターアクションと日本語教育-今何が求められているか-" 112 : 2002

      17 島田めぐみ, "アジア5都市の日系企業におけるビジネス日本語のニーズ" (103) : 109-118, 2000

      18 Gumperz, J, "Talk at Work" Cambridge University Press 302-327, 1992

      19 Hymes, D., "Sociolinguistics" Penguin Books 1972

      20 Tannen, D., "Interactional sociolinguistics International encyclopedia of linguistics : 3.9-12" Oxford University Press 1992

      21 Gumperz, J, "Discourse strategies" Cambridge University Press 1982

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.33 0.33 0.31
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.31 0.524 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼