헤겔 예술철학 낭만적 예술형식에서 ‘주관성의 형식주의’의 정당성 = Justification of ’Formalism of Subjectivity' in Form of Romantic Art by Hegel

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study inquires into justification of ’Fonnalism of Subjectivity' in fonn of romantic art in Hegel’s Aesthetic. Romantic art has its distinguishing circles, which are religious, secular and fonnalism of subject. But for the characters of each circle are inconsistent, the inconsistency needs a clarification based on the principle of the fonn of romantic art. This study would show that the principle of the fonn of romantic art is ’form of 따t based on the reality of 'Spirit" in tenns of the spiritual content and sensual fonn. So, Hegel's mentions would be considered here 'Stuff doesn’t express intemality.' 'But intemality has to be arisen from stuff.' 'Stuff expresses dissatisfaction with outwardness for intemality.' These are saying reality, in the art grounded on the reality of 'Spirit’ is not something expressed by stuff or sensual fonn but shows their inadequacy. And the spiritual intemality appears fonn by inadequate stuff and sensual fonn.
Also this study would take attention to concepts like ’religious community’, ’audience’, 'direct relationship within peoples', 'base of mankind'. It is for giving an explanation of where 'Spirit’ retum to in fonn of romantic art if 'Spirit’ is based on its reality and retums to itself. This would clarify that spiritual reality is not in stuff and fonn of work of art, but in relationship within people in existence. So the inquiry of the status of ’fonnalism of subjectivity' in fonn of romantic art would be helpful for consideration of the beginning of modem art which says ’anything goes in Hegel’s aesthetic.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 찰스 테일러, "헤겔철학과 현대의 위기" 서광사 1988

2 이병창, "헤겔의 아름다운 영혼 개념에 관한 연구" 26 : 2001

3 헤겔, "헤겔의 미학강의 Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ" 은행나무 2010

4 권정임, "헤겔의 ‘예술미’ 개념에 기초한 근대 부조화적 미(추)의 성립원리에 관하여" 한국미학예술학회 27 : 5-38, 2008

5 윤병태, "헤겔사유에서 미(美)의 이념과 현존의 관계" 국제언어인문학회 30 (30): 39-58, 2006

6 헤겔, "헤겔 예술철학" 미술문화 2008

7 박구용, "헤겔 미학의 체계와 현재성" 5.18연구소 8 (8): 309-338, 2008

8 R. 크로너, "헤겔" 청아출판사 1990

9 박구용, "예술의 종말과 자율성" 한국사회와철학연구회 (12) : 57-98, 2006

10 뤽 페리, "미학적 인간" 고려원 1994

11 W. 타타르키비츠, "미학의 기본 개념사" 미술문화 1999

12 E. 카시러, "계몽주의 철학" 민음사 1995

13 권정임, "“상징적 예술형식”의 해석을 통해서 본 헤겔미학의 현재적 의미"

14 Hegel, "Vorlesungen uber die Philosophie der Kunst" Felix Meiner 2003

15 Hegel, "Vorlesungen uber die Asthetik Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ" suhrkamp 1986