玄洲 趙纘韓의 『蜃樓上樑文』 연구-「蜃樓記」와의 對比를 통하여- = A Study on Hyun-Ju(玄洲) Cho, chan-han(趙纘韓)'s 『Sinroo Sangryangmun(蜃樓上樑文)』 -Through a Contrast Study on it & 「Sinroogi(蜃樓記)」-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Hyun Ju Cho, chan-han(1572～1631) was an excellent person of literary ability as being pointed to be a member of 'Huoja(後五子)', in particular, was openly recognized as an excellent ability in Byounmun(騈文) at that time. However, his literature has not received much attention compared to his reputation and awareness, and discussion limited delivery and record regarding his prose has been done. This paper is to focus on Cho, Chan-han's prose-expecially Byoun-style prose-area lack of the existing research and to investigate characteristic aspects of Cho, Chan-han's prose through the analysis of 「Sinroo Sangryangmun」. Chapter 2 addresses a general view of the contents, Chapter 3 examines rhetorical features, based on this, Chapter 4 draws out Cho, Chan-han's prose characteristics. In the process of looking at characteristics of 「Sinroo Sangryangmun」, a contrast study on it and 「Sinroogi」.
「Sinroo Sangryangmun」's contents follow general contents structure of Sangryangmun(上樑文), consisting of a general argument for habitation and a prologue of the need for divine architecture, practices and preparation process for Sinroo construction, original saying depicting its scene after Sinroo(蜃樓) construction and Yukwisong(六位訟) blessing for the six sides such as North, South, East and West, Top and Bottom, and closing remarks saying praying for peace and stability. Though its way is different from that of「Sinroogi」written in a concise narrative form, it's the same as emphasizing the value of Sinroo where is Yeominhaerock(與民偕樂)'s space.「Sinroo Sangryangmun」's rhetorical techniques are to highlight the characteristics of Byounmun style focusing on the balance and harmony of meaning, number of characters, syllables. Yet, its techniques are to have a variety of rhetorical devices in developing the contents which may be liable bored and to do colorful and rich contents development.「Sinroo Sangryangmun」's rhetorical techniques which are to emphasize Byounmun style's Yutang beauty and vocabulary beauty have the opposite pattern of those of 「Sinroogi」which are to focus on Gomun(古文) style's beauty of brevity by delivering a clear message with Wooeon(寓言) and parody techniques. With respect of Cho, Chan-han's prose characteristics seen based on the above contents, first there are a lot of literature-oriented writing features in terms of coverage. Second, the ability of delivering contents is improved by using the characteristics of each style of writing properly. Third, there are a lot of 『Zhuangzi(莊子)』's expressive characteristics.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김희자, "현주 조찬한의 시문학 연구" 단국대학교 대학원 2006

2 윤미길, "조찬한의 현실인식" 한국어교육학회 93 : 1997

3 안세현, "조선중기 文風의 변화와 科文" 대동문화연구원 (74) : 225-254, 2011

4 강경희, "조선시대 東坡「赤壁賦」의 수용 ― 赤壁船遊와 「赤壁賦」倣作을 중심으로" 중국어문학연구회 (61) : 405-425, 2010

5 공영훈, "의탁전 우언의 글쓰기 양상" 동국대학교 교육대학원 2006

6 양승민, "우언의 서사문법과 담론양상" 學古房 2008

7 김우정, "선조ㆍ광해 연간 文風의 변화와 그 의미: 前後七子 수용 논의의 반성적 고찰을 겸하여" 한국한문학회 (39) : 187-222, 2007

8 심경호, "상량문의 문학성 시론" 우리한문학회 20 : 319-353, 2009

9 이상섭, "문학비평용어사전" 민음사 2010

10 오용원, "누정문학의 양식(樣式)과 문체적 특징 - 누정 상량문(上樑文)과 기문(記文)을 중심으로" 한국문학언어학회 (44) : 191-222, 2006

11 최경환, "趙纘韓의 <宮中四時詞>와 연작시의 구성 원리" 한국한문학회 20 : 1997

12 안득용, "谿谷 張維 樓亭記 硏究" 한국고전문학회 (32) : 373-409, 2007

13 조찬한, "玄洲集" 민족문화추진회 1993

14 朴東烈, "玄洲 趙纘韓의 문학연구 : 근체시를 중심으로" 弘益大學校 敎育大學院 1994

15 김희자, "玄洲 趙纘韓의 문학관" 한국사상문화학회 (26) : 61-88, 2004

16 김희자, "玄洲 趙纘韓의 詩世界 -仕宦期의 現實認識을 中心으로" 근역한문학회 24 : 2006

17 손찬식, "玄洲 趙纘韓의 莊子的 思惟와 神仙趣向的 詩世界" 한국도교문화학회 18 : 83-124, 2003

18 정도상, "玄洲 趙纘韓의 文學 一考" 근역한문학회 18 : 2000

19 김희자, "玄洲 趙纘韓의 傳 연구" 근역한문학회 33 : 99-119, 2011

20 김우정, "玄洲 趙纘韓 散文의 硏究 -17세기 초 文壇의 風情과 관련하여-" 한국한문교육학회 (31) : 311-336, 2008

21 김희자, "洪萬宗의 詩評을 通해 본 玄洲 詩의 한 양상" 인문과학연구소 36 (36): 69-92, 2009

22 "朝鮮王朝實錄(光海君日記)"

23 손찬식, "朝鮮中期 道敎思想의 詩文學的 受容 硏究: 趙纘韓을 중심으로" 경상대학교 인문학연구소 28 : 2001

24 "書經"

25 허균, "惺所覆瓿藁" 민족문화추진회 1991

26 朱世英, "中國散文學通論" 安徽敎育出版社 1995