RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neglect Syndrome in Stroke Patients

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103365432

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective To examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) improves visuospatial attention in stroke patients with left visuospatial neglect.Methods Patients were randomly assigned to...

      Objective To examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) improves visuospatial attention in stroke patients with left visuospatial neglect.Methods Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: anodal tDCS over the right PPC, cathodal tDCS over the left PPC, or sham tDCS. Each patient underwent 15 sessions of tDCS (5 sessions per week for 3 weeks; 2 mA for 30 minutes in each session). Outcome measures were assessed before treatment and 1 week after completing the treatment.Results From pre- to post-treatment, there was an improvement in the motor-free visual perception test (MVPT), line bisection test (LBT), star cancellation test (SCT), Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS), Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI), and Functional Ambulation Classification in all 3 groups. Improvements in the MVPT, SCT, and LBT were greater in the anodal and cathodal groups than in the sham group. However, improvements in other outcomes were not significantly different between the 3 groups, although there was a tendency for improved CBS or K-MBI scores in the anodal and cathodal groups, as compared with the sham group.Conclusion The study results indicated that the facilitatory effect of anodal tDCS applied over the right PPC, and the inhibitory effect of cathodal tDCS applied over the left PPC, improved symptoms of visuospatial neglect. Thus, tDCS could be a successful adjuvant therapeutic modality to recover neglect symptom, but this recovery might not lead to improvements in activities of daily living function and gait function.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Pierce SR, "Treatments of unilateral neglect:a review" 83 : 256-268, 2002

      2 Gandiga PC, "Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind shamcontrolled clinical studies in brain stimulation" 117 : 845-850, 2006

      3 van Wyk A, "The effect of visual scanning exercises integrated into physiotherapy in patients with unilateral spatial neglect poststroke: a matched-pair randomized control trial" 28 : 856-873, 2014

      4 Bowen A, "Spatial neglect: is rehabilitation effective?" 33 : 2728-2729, 2002

      5 Tomaiuolo F, "Selective visual neglect in right brain damaged patients with splenial interhemispheric disconnection" 206 : 209-217, 2010

      6 Arene NU, "Rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect and neuroimaging" 43 : 255-269, 2007

      7 Yang NY, "Rehabilitation interventions for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review from 1997 through 2012" 7 : 187-, 2013

      8 Wassermann EM, "Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization" 9 : 503-505, 2005

      9 Liebetanz D, "Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability" 125 (125): 2238-2247, 2002

      10 Hummel FC, "Non-invasive brain stimulation:a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?" 5 : 708-712, 2006

      1 Pierce SR, "Treatments of unilateral neglect:a review" 83 : 256-268, 2002

      2 Gandiga PC, "Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind shamcontrolled clinical studies in brain stimulation" 117 : 845-850, 2006

      3 van Wyk A, "The effect of visual scanning exercises integrated into physiotherapy in patients with unilateral spatial neglect poststroke: a matched-pair randomized control trial" 28 : 856-873, 2014

      4 Bowen A, "Spatial neglect: is rehabilitation effective?" 33 : 2728-2729, 2002

      5 Tomaiuolo F, "Selective visual neglect in right brain damaged patients with splenial interhemispheric disconnection" 206 : 209-217, 2010

      6 Arene NU, "Rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect and neuroimaging" 43 : 255-269, 2007

      7 Yang NY, "Rehabilitation interventions for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review from 1997 through 2012" 7 : 187-, 2013

      8 Wassermann EM, "Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization" 9 : 503-505, 2005

      9 Liebetanz D, "Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability" 125 (125): 2238-2247, 2002

      10 Hummel FC, "Non-invasive brain stimulation:a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?" 5 : 708-712, 2006

      11 Edwards D, "Modulating the healthy and affected motor cortex with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke: development of new strategies for neurorehabilitation" 23 : 3-14, 2008

      12 Schenkenberg T, "Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment" 30 : 509-517, 1980

      13 Dambeck N, "Interhemispheric imbalance during visuospatial attention investigated by unilateral and bilateral TMS over human parietal cortices" 1072 : 194-199, 2006

      14 Fierro B, "Improving neglect by TMS" 17 : 169-176, 2006

      15 Kinsbourne M, "Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry" 18 : 41-49, 1977

      16 Sunwoo H, "Effects of dual transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke unilateral visuospatial neglect" 554 : 94-98, 2013

      17 Kim BR, "Effect of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visuospatial neglect in patients with acute stroke: a double-blind, sham-controlled trial" 94 : 803-807, 2013

      18 Fritsch B, "Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning" 66 : 198-204, 2010

      19 Antal A, "Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans" 16 : 521-527, 2004

      20 Schweid L, "Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on posterior parietal cortex disrupts visuo-spatial processing in the contralateral visual field" 186 : 409-417, 2008

      21 Sparing R, "Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation" 132 (132): 3011-3020, 2009

      22 Azouvi P, "Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale" 84 : 51-57, 2003

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-06-28 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한재활의학회지 -> Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.19 0.17
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.19 0.397 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼