다요인 변동성과 주식수익률: 칼만 필터의 이용 = The Relationship between the Multifactor Volatility and the Excess Returns: Using the Kalman Filter

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Many researchers have analyzed the relationship between the volatility and the excess return using the Fama-French (FF) three factors, but the empirical results are shown differently depending on the method of analysis. One of the reasons for the difference in results arises from the measurement of FF 3 factors. Previous studies used each factor mainly as an observational rate of return, and for this reason, the time series characteristics of the factors are not accurately reflected in the analysis. In this study, the dynamic factor is extracted using the Kalman filter after applying FF 3 factors to the state-space model. Analysis using dynamic factors can reduce the uncertainty of estimates and improve forecasting of portfolio performance because it shows the relationship of financial time series over time well. Therefore, this study using a dynamic factor model can provide more accurate results in various analyses related to characterization of stock returns and the volatility risk premium.
As a result of the analysis, it was found that the variance errors in the state equation has a GARCH(1,1) process, and that small firms are more sensitive to size factors than large firms. In addition, the Korean stock market was found to require a higher risk premium in a bearish market. As a result of applying a two-pass regression analysis for 81 equal-weighted and value-weighted portfolios, the explanatory power of the model was improved when the volatility of error variance was included. It was found that the ex-post size and value factor had significant positive and negative risk premiums, respectively, and the variance factor of the value had a negative risk premium. On the other hand, it was confirmed that the risk premium of the value variance factor has a very large negative value compared to the risk premium of the value factor, and the risk premium of each factor can vary according to the method of estimating the average return.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김태혁, "한국 주식시장에서 3요인 모형을 이용한 주식수익률의 고유변동성과 기대수익률 간의 관계" 한국증권학회 40 (40): 525-550, 2011

2 이상빈, "주식시장의 초과수익률과 고유변동성의 동적 관계 및 정보효율성에 관한 연구" 한국증권학회 36 (36): 387-423, 2007

3 윤선중, "분산프리미엄과 변동성예측에 대한 연구 : 한국, 대만, 미국 시장을 중심으로" 한국금융공학회 17 (17): 29-52, 2018

4 정정현, "변동성변화에 대한 민감도와 주식수익률간의 횡단면적 관계" 한국금융공학회 6 (6): 93-115, 2007

5 윤상용, "기업변동성프리미엄은 주식수익률을 예측하는가?" 한국금융공학회 13 (13): 31-51, 2014

6 윤상용, "기업변동성과 주식수익률의 횡단면에 관한 연구" 한국재무학회 24 (24): 91-131, 2011

7 Itamar Drechsler, "What’s Vol Got to Do with It" 24 (24): 1-45, 2011

8 Athanasios P. Fassas, "Variance Risk Premium and Equity Returns" 46 : 462-470, 2018

9 Bing Han, "Variance Risk Premium and Cross-Section of Stock Returns" University of Texas at Austin 1-52, 2012

10 Hui Guo, "Uncovering the Risk-Return Relation in the Stock Market" 61 (61): 1433-1463, 2006

11 Timothy Simin, "The Poor Predictive Performance of Asset Pricing Models" 43 (43): 355-380, 2008

12 Sydney C. Ludvigson, "The Empirical Risk-Return Relation : A Factor Analysis Approach" 83 : 171-222, 2007

13 Andrew Ang, "The Cross-section of Volatility and Expected Returns" 61 (61): 259-299, 2006

14 Eugene F. Fama, "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns" 47 (47): 427-465, 1992

15 Tobias Adrian, "Stock Returns and Volatility : Pricing the Short-run and Long-run Components of Market Risk" 63 (63): 2997-3030, 2008

16 Eugene F. Fama, "Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns" 50 (50): 131-155, 1995

17 Maria Vassalou, "News related to future GDP growth as a risk factor in equity Returns" 68 : 47-73, 2003

18 Eugene F. Fama, "Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies" 51 (51): 55-184, 1996

19 Zhongzhi He, "Multi-factor Volatility and Stock Returns" 61 : S132-S149, 2015

20 Martin Belvisi, "Modelling Financial Markets Comovements During Crises : A Dynamic Multi-Factor Approach" 35 : 317-360, 2016

21 Andrew Ang, "High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence" 91 (91): 1-23, 2009

22 Edwin J. van Vliet, "Forecasting the Implied Volatility Surface using Dynamic Factor Models with GARCH Disturbances" Erasmus University Rotterdam 2017

23 Manuel Ammann, "Factor Exposure Variation and Mutual Fund Performance" 76 (76): 101-118, 2020

24 Tim Bollerslev, "Expected Sock Returns and Variance Risk Premia" 22 (22): 4463-4492, 2009

25 Zhongzhi He, "Dynamic Factors and Asset Pricing" 45 (45): 707-737, 2010

26 Bruno Feunou, "Downside Variance Risk Premium" 16 (16): 341-383, 2018

27 Christian Menden, "Dissecting the Financial Cycle with Dynamic Factor Models" 17 (17): 1965-1994, 2017

28 Wayne E. Ferson, "Conditioning Variables and the Cross Section of Stock Returns" 54 (54): 1325-1360, 1999

29 Eugene F. Fama, "Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds" 33 : 3-56, 1993

30 Omar Aguilar, "Bayesian Dynamic Factor Models and Portfolio Allocation" 18 (18): 338-357, 2000

31 John H. Cochrane, "Asset Pricing" Princeton University Press 2005

32 Junping Chen, "Asset Prices and Economic Fluctuations : The Implications of Stochastic Volatility" 64 : 128-140, 2017

33 Jonathan Lewellen, "A Skeptical Appraisal of Asset Pricing Tests" 96 (96): 175-194, 2010