RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      김정은・시진핑 시기 외교적 수사와 북중관계의 전략적 상이성 = Diplomatic Rhetoric and Strategic Divergence in North Korea-China Relations during the Kim Jong-un and Xi Jinping Era

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109639771

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aims to analyze the diplomatic and strategic language exchanged between North Korea and China during the leadership of Kim Jong-un and Xi Jinping. The research covers a 12-year period from 2013 to 2024 and categorizes North Korea–China relations into three phases: periods of conflict, rapprochement, and status quo. It examines the shifts in diplomatic rhetoric and certain strategic narratives in each phase. The analysis confirms that diplomatic rhetoric and strategic narratives have undergone significant changes in response to international and regional developments as well as shifts in bilateral relations. During periods of conflict, the frequency of traditional rhetoric emphasizing friendly relations significantly declined, and certain narratives were altered or undermined. In contrast, during periods of rapprochement, a form of resilience was observed as friendly rhetoric and narratives were reinstated. In the status quo phase, while both countries continued to employ amicable rhetoric, differences in emphasis and frequency became apparent based on their respective strategic positions. Nevertheless, a structural gap stemming from strategic divergence persisted regardless of the nature of bilateral relations. China has consistently sought to restrain North Korea’s military adventurism and encourage its focus on economic development, whereas North Korea has emphasized the need to maintain a balance of terror and leverage great power conflicts to enhance its bargaining power. These differences have been a fundamental source of recurrent tensions and constrained cooperation in North Korea–China relations.
      번역하기

      This study aims to analyze the diplomatic and strategic language exchanged between North Korea and China during the leadership of Kim Jong-un and Xi Jinping. The research covers a 12-year period from 2013 to 2024 and categorizes North Korea–China re...

      This study aims to analyze the diplomatic and strategic language exchanged between North Korea and China during the leadership of Kim Jong-un and Xi Jinping. The research covers a 12-year period from 2013 to 2024 and categorizes North Korea–China relations into three phases: periods of conflict, rapprochement, and status quo. It examines the shifts in diplomatic rhetoric and certain strategic narratives in each phase. The analysis confirms that diplomatic rhetoric and strategic narratives have undergone significant changes in response to international and regional developments as well as shifts in bilateral relations. During periods of conflict, the frequency of traditional rhetoric emphasizing friendly relations significantly declined, and certain narratives were altered or undermined. In contrast, during periods of rapprochement, a form of resilience was observed as friendly rhetoric and narratives were reinstated. In the status quo phase, while both countries continued to employ amicable rhetoric, differences in emphasis and frequency became apparent based on their respective strategic positions. Nevertheless, a structural gap stemming from strategic divergence persisted regardless of the nature of bilateral relations. China has consistently sought to restrain North Korea’s military adventurism and encourage its focus on economic development, whereas North Korea has emphasized the need to maintain a balance of terror and leverage great power conflicts to enhance its bargaining power. These differences have been a fundamental source of recurrent tensions and constrained cooperation in North Korea–China relations.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼