The purpose of this paper is to explain control theory without Coercion Lesical Rule that was set up to deal with control construcGCns with "be allowed to structure, Pc1Lasd & Sag(1994) insisted tthat such unsatuated phrases as "to ke allowed to compl...
The purpose of this paper is to explain control theory without Coercion Lesical Rule that was set up to deal with control construcGCns with "be allowed to structure, Pc1Lasd & Sag(1994) insisted tthat such unsatuated phrases as "to ke allowed to complements require coerced Laterpretaticns when they cccuued as cc[gdements c contLL e,p esstons, Hcwever, it can make CoeLcLon LScal Rate unnecessary Lo utilise dre passive lexeme structure in the interpretation of "to be allowed t' complements and to accept the revised control theory suggsted by Asudeh(1988) , Rhnning and Sag(1997, 1999) explained binding theory with ARGST(A[gument Structue), The analysts c conkd construction with ARG-ST will make, it possible to solve an entangled sentence Ln whLch the cane cut biding [eLabLoq passive cmstructicn, and control ccnshuctLm in one sentence.