RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Comparison of Spontaneous Speech and Read Speech: Prosodic Analysis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103953976

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper investigates some prosodic characteristics in the comparison of spontaneous speech and read speech. It deals with various differences in two styles of speech with regard to pitch range, utterance duration, the whole intermediate phrase dura...

      This paper investigates some prosodic characteristics in the comparison of spontaneous speech and read speech. It deals with various differences in two styles of speech with regard to pitch range, utterance duration, the whole intermediate phrase duration, pause, and the numbers of intermediate phrases,intonational phrases, pitch accents, monotones, bitones, boundary tones (L-L% and L-H%), and cases in which the pitch range of the first intermediate phrase is greater than that of the following intermediate phrase. The main finding of this study is that spontaneous speech is different from read speech in various prosodic aspects. The mean value of pitch ranges was larger in spontaneous speech than in read speech. Each mean value of utterance durations, the whole intermediate phrase durations, and pauses was also larger in spontaneous speech than in read speech. Each average number of intermediate phrases/intonational phrases, pitch accents, bitones, boundary tones (L-L%, L-H%), and cases in which the pitch range of the first intermediate phrase was greater than that of the following intermediate phrase was also larger in spontaneous speech than in read speech, except the average number of monotones. On the contrary, the mean value of monotones was smaller in spontaneous speech than in read speech.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Silverman, K., "ToBI: a Standard for Labeling English Prosody" 867-870, 1992

      2 Pierrehumbert, J. B., "The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation" MIT 1980

      3 Blaauw, E., "The Contribution of Prosodic Boundary Markers to the Perceptual Difference between Read and Spontaneous Speech" 14 : 359-375, 1994

      4 Brown, G., "Questions of Intonation" Croom Helm 1980

      5 Cutler, A., "Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language : a Literature Review" 40 (40): 141-201, 1997

      6 Shockey, L. R., "Phonetic and Phonological Properties of Connected Speech" 17 : iv-143-, 1974

      7 Blaauw, E., "Phonetic Characteristics of Spontaneous and Read Speech. In Proceedings" 1991

      8 Ladd, D. R., "Intonational Phonology" Cambridge University Press 1996

      9 Bolinger, D., "Intonation and its Parts : Melody in Spoken English" Stanford University Press 1986

      10 Butterworth, B., "Hesitation and Semantic Planning in Speech" 4 : 75-87, 1975

      1 Silverman, K., "ToBI: a Standard for Labeling English Prosody" 867-870, 1992

      2 Pierrehumbert, J. B., "The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation" MIT 1980

      3 Blaauw, E., "The Contribution of Prosodic Boundary Markers to the Perceptual Difference between Read and Spontaneous Speech" 14 : 359-375, 1994

      4 Brown, G., "Questions of Intonation" Croom Helm 1980

      5 Cutler, A., "Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language : a Literature Review" 40 (40): 141-201, 1997

      6 Shockey, L. R., "Phonetic and Phonological Properties of Connected Speech" 17 : iv-143-, 1974

      7 Blaauw, E., "Phonetic Characteristics of Spontaneous and Read Speech. In Proceedings" 1991

      8 Ladd, D. R., "Intonational Phonology" Cambridge University Press 1996

      9 Bolinger, D., "Intonation and its Parts : Melody in Spoken English" Stanford University Press 1986

      10 Butterworth, B., "Hesitation and Semantic Planning in Speech" 4 : 75-87, 1975

      11 Beckman, M., "Guidelines for ToBI Labeling" Ohio State University 1997

      12 Ayers, G. M., "Discourse Functions of Pitch Range in Spontaneous and Read Speech" Ohio State University 1994

      13 Howell, P., "Comparison of Prosodic Properties between Read and Spontaneous Speech Material" 10 : 163-169, 1991

      14 Silverman, K., "A Prosodic Comparison of Spontaneous Speech and Read Speech" 1299-1302, 1992

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Joong Won Linguistic Society Of Korea -> The Joongwon Linguistic Society of Korea KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-05-14 학회명변경 한글명 : 중원언어학회 -> 한국중원언어학회
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.53
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.51 0.864 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼