As the existence of the Foreign Office(統理交涉通商事務衙門) shows, modern diplomacy in Joseon was institutionalized in the name of ‘intercourse(交涉)’ with some restrictions. Originally, ‘intercourse’ had a negative connotation of...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109511819
2024
Korean
교섭 ; 통리교섭통상사무아문 ; 외교 ; 상주사절 ; 김윤식 ; intercourse(交涉) ; Foreign Office(統理交涉通商事務衙門) ; diplomacy(外交) ; envoy ; Kim Yun-sik(金允植)
911
KCI등재
학술저널
149-191(43쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
As the existence of the Foreign Office(統理交涉通商事務衙門) shows, modern diplomacy in Joseon was institutionalized in the name of ‘intercourse(交涉)’ with some restrictions. Originally, ‘intercourse’ had a negative connotation of...
As the existence of the Foreign Office(統理交涉通商事務衙門) shows, modern diplomacy in Joseon was institutionalized in the name of ‘intercourse(交涉)’ with some restrictions. Originally, ‘intercourse’ had a negative connotation of interacting with foreigners and was perceived as a kind of disruption in Joseon. But its meaning was redefined to correspond to intercourse, which refers to the dispatch of a envoy according to the Western custom in treaties signed by East Asian countries. This paper identifies this as the Western concept of intercourse and explores the process of limited institutionalization of modern diplomacy by adopting this concept in Joseon, focusing on the activities of Kim Yun-sik.<BR/> The Western concept of intercourse is particularly relevant to the function of the resident envoy system. In principle, ‘intercousrse(交涉)’ corresponds to the relationship between states, but it can also refer to the correspondence(交涉往來) between consuls and local officials, as well as to judicial proceeding/justice(交涉事件, 案件).<BR/> Despite some limitations, it should be noted that Joseon sought to institutionalize the functional aspects of diplomacy represented by envoys through the Western concept of intercourse. Rather, it is symbolic of the historical situation of Joseon in the 1880s that the presence of Qing forced Joseon to adopt only the functional and practical aspects of modern diplomacy centered on envoys through the name of ‘intercourse’ instead of explicit and full diplomacy.
기해 · 병오년 사옥(邪獄)의 형정과 19세기 중반 위기의식의 실제(1839~1846)
『투사신문』을 통해 본 재북 남로당계의 선전 활동 - 1948~50년을 중심으로
전시체제기(1937~45) 조선총독부의 축우(畜牛) 유통통제정책 연구