RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Disjunction and the Distinction of Also and Even

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103740153

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The standard approach to also and even as additive or inclusive focus particles is reconsidered. Given their striking behavioral differences within disjunctive coordination, it is argued that the two focus particles don’t form a natural class. Under the assumption that disjuncts coordinated with or represent independent potentialities, thereby not allowing the information of the second disjunct to be added to that of the first disjunct, the common occurrence of even within second disjuncts contrasts clearly with the overall unacceptability of also within second disjuncts. This strongly suggests that even does not trigger the existential presupposition, and therefore necessitates a new typology of focus particles.
      번역하기

      The standard approach to also and even as additive or inclusive focus particles is reconsidered. Given their striking behavioral differences within disjunctive coordination, it is argued that the two focus particles don’t form a natural class. Under...

      The standard approach to also and even as additive or inclusive focus particles is reconsidered. Given their striking behavioral differences within disjunctive coordination, it is argued that the two focus particles don’t form a natural class. Under the assumption that disjuncts coordinated with or represent independent potentialities, thereby not allowing the information of the second disjunct to be added to that of the first disjunct, the common occurrence of even within second disjuncts contrasts clearly with the overall unacceptability of also within second disjuncts. This strongly suggests that even does not trigger the existential presupposition, and therefore necessitates a new typology of focus particles.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 König, Ekkehard, "The Meaning of Focus Particles, In Comparative Perspective" Routledge 1991

      2 Schwarz, Bernhard, "Scalar Additive Particles in Negative Contexts" 13 : 125-168, 2005

      3 Singh, Raj, "On the Interpretation of Disjunction: Asymmetric, Incremental, and Eager for Inconsistency" 31 : 245-260, 2008

      4 Krahmer, Emiel, "Negation and Disjunction in Discourse Representation Theory" 12 : 357-376, 1995

      5 Fauconnier, Gilles, "Mental Spaces, In Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language" MIT Press 1985

      6 Ducrot, Oswald, "Les Échelles Argumentatives" Les Edítions de Minuit 1980

      7 Geurts, Bart, "Interpreting Focus" 30 : 1-44, 2004

      8 Kamp, Hans, "Free Choice Permission" 74 : 57-74, 1974

      9 Zimmerman, Thomas Ede, "Free Choice Disjunction and Epistemic Possibility" 8 : 255-290, 2000

      10 Francescotti, Robert M, "Even: The Conventional Implicature Approach Reconsidered" 18 (18): 153-173, 1995

      1 König, Ekkehard, "The Meaning of Focus Particles, In Comparative Perspective" Routledge 1991

      2 Schwarz, Bernhard, "Scalar Additive Particles in Negative Contexts" 13 : 125-168, 2005

      3 Singh, Raj, "On the Interpretation of Disjunction: Asymmetric, Incremental, and Eager for Inconsistency" 31 : 245-260, 2008

      4 Krahmer, Emiel, "Negation and Disjunction in Discourse Representation Theory" 12 : 357-376, 1995

      5 Fauconnier, Gilles, "Mental Spaces, In Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language" MIT Press 1985

      6 Ducrot, Oswald, "Les Échelles Argumentatives" Les Edítions de Minuit 1980

      7 Geurts, Bart, "Interpreting Focus" 30 : 1-44, 2004

      8 Kamp, Hans, "Free Choice Permission" 74 : 57-74, 1974

      9 Zimmerman, Thomas Ede, "Free Choice Disjunction and Epistemic Possibility" 8 : 255-290, 2000

      10 Francescotti, Robert M, "Even: The Conventional Implicature Approach Reconsidered" 18 (18): 153-173, 1995

      11 Kay, Paul, "Even" 13 : 59-111, 1990

      12 Karttunen, Paul, "Conventional Implicature, In Syntax and Semantics: Presupposition" Academic Press 1-56, 1979

      13 Rooth, Mats, "Association with Focus" University of Massachusetts 1985

      14 Horn, Laurence R, "A Presuppositional Analysis of Only and Even" Chicago Linguistic Society 98-107, 1969

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-08-25 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국언어학회(대표:홍재성) -> 한국언어학회 KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-08-16 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국언어학회(대표:임홍빈) -> 한국언어학회(대표:홍재성)
      영문명 : The Linguistic Society Of Korea -> The Linguistic Society of Korea
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-19 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Linguistics KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.71 0.71 0.66
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.67 0.6 1.198 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼