RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      부틀렉 패션의 특성에 대한 연구 = A study on the characteristics of Bootleg fashion

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106604873

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Bootleg fashion emerged from the fashion industry after 2010, and has been used across a range of different genres. However, it has yet to be theoretically established; therefore, this study will explain bootleg fashion as a new genre, which will help in the planning and designing of products within domestic fashion brands. The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics and internal meaning of bootleg fashion as a recently emerged fashion phenomenon that borrows from other brands without permission. The research methodology included a theoretical literature review of fashion sites and related materials and empirical research using case analysis. Results of the analysis of both characteristics and internal meaning of bootleg fashion suggest the following characteristics:ᅠ“unauthorized use of symbolic elements,” “disorganization of boundaries between fashion,” “multiplicity through globalization,” and “newness through deconstruction and recombination.” Internal meanings derived from the analysis were “parody through symbol,” which is seen as “a parody and homage resulting from the unauthorized use of a brand,” while “decomposition through disorganization” is seen as a break-up of the boundaries between different fashions from a mainstream-oriented perspective. A juxtaposition of elements was demonstrated by “playfulness through transformation,” which showed that such fashion cannot coexist with positional transposition. Finally, “spread as a cultural phenomenon” was derived through the diffusion through digital media with DIY culture. As such, bootleg fashion has been reborn as an innovative fashion genre, breaking the taboo of the illegitimate from the past and demonstrating new endeavors.
      번역하기

      Bootleg fashion emerged from the fashion industry after 2010, and has been used across a range of different genres. However, it has yet to be theoretically established; therefore, this study will explain bootleg fashion as a new genre, which will help...

      Bootleg fashion emerged from the fashion industry after 2010, and has been used across a range of different genres. However, it has yet to be theoretically established; therefore, this study will explain bootleg fashion as a new genre, which will help in the planning and designing of products within domestic fashion brands. The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics and internal meaning of bootleg fashion as a recently emerged fashion phenomenon that borrows from other brands without permission. The research methodology included a theoretical literature review of fashion sites and related materials and empirical research using case analysis. Results of the analysis of both characteristics and internal meaning of bootleg fashion suggest the following characteristics:ᅠ“unauthorized use of symbolic elements,” “disorganization of boundaries between fashion,” “multiplicity through globalization,” and “newness through deconstruction and recombination.” Internal meanings derived from the analysis were “parody through symbol,” which is seen as “a parody and homage resulting from the unauthorized use of a brand,” while “decomposition through disorganization” is seen as a break-up of the boundaries between different fashions from a mainstream-oriented perspective. A juxtaposition of elements was demonstrated by “playfulness through transformation,” which showed that such fashion cannot coexist with positional transposition. Finally, “spread as a cultural phenomenon” was derived through the diffusion through digital media with DIY culture. As such, bootleg fashion has been reborn as an innovative fashion genre, breaking the taboo of the illegitimate from the past and demonstrating new endeavors.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김 윤, "프리프합 패션의 특성 연구" 한양대학교 대학원 2014

      2 이수인, "컬렉션에 나타난 현대 헤어스타일의 포스트모더니즘 표현 양상(Ⅰ)" 복식문화학회 14 (14): 16-29, 2006

      3 이정인, "상표, 브랜드, 로고이미지 패러디와 지적재산권에 관한 연구 - 상표권과 부정경쟁방지법을 중심으로 -" 한국디자인문화학회 17 (17): 652-664, 2011

      4 Kim, M. J., "복식미학 패션을 보는 시각과 패션에 대한 생각" Kyomunsa 2013

      5 한순자, "복식 디자인 이미지 차용에 대한 연구" 한국니트디자인학회 12 (12): 1-11, 2014

      6 이지현, "매니쉬(mannish)룩의 포스트모더니즘적 접근을 통한 패션디자인 개발 연구" 한국패션디자인학회 11 (11): 47-60, 2011

      7 김소현, "니트 패션에 나타난 포스트모더니즘 특성에 관한 연구 - 2010년 이후 컬렉션 중심으로 -" 한국패션디자인학회 13 (13): 39-52, 2013

      8 Vogue, "Vetements 2020 S/S"

      9 Vogue, "Vetements 2019 S/S"

      10 Independent, "Vetements 2017 F/W"

      1 김 윤, "프리프합 패션의 특성 연구" 한양대학교 대학원 2014

      2 이수인, "컬렉션에 나타난 현대 헤어스타일의 포스트모더니즘 표현 양상(Ⅰ)" 복식문화학회 14 (14): 16-29, 2006

      3 이정인, "상표, 브랜드, 로고이미지 패러디와 지적재산권에 관한 연구 - 상표권과 부정경쟁방지법을 중심으로 -" 한국디자인문화학회 17 (17): 652-664, 2011

      4 Kim, M. J., "복식미학 패션을 보는 시각과 패션에 대한 생각" Kyomunsa 2013

      5 한순자, "복식 디자인 이미지 차용에 대한 연구" 한국니트디자인학회 12 (12): 1-11, 2014

      6 이지현, "매니쉬(mannish)룩의 포스트모더니즘적 접근을 통한 패션디자인 개발 연구" 한국패션디자인학회 11 (11): 47-60, 2011

      7 김소현, "니트 패션에 나타난 포스트모더니즘 특성에 관한 연구 - 2010년 이후 컬렉션 중심으로 -" 한국패션디자인학회 13 (13): 39-52, 2013

      8 Vogue, "Vetements 2020 S/S"

      9 Vogue, "Vetements 2019 S/S"

      10 Independent, "Vetements 2017 F/W"

      11 Vogue, "Vetements 2017 F/W"

      12 Vogue, "Vetements 2015 F/W"

      13 Raustiala, K., "The piracy paradox : Innovation and intellectual property In fashion design" 92 (92): 1687-1777, 2006

      14 Jin, K. O., "The formativeness of parody adapted modern fashion design" Kyunghee University 2001

      15 Trashermagazine, "Skateboard magazine Thrasher logo"

      16 Amazon, "Nirvana Smiley logo"

      17 Instagram, "Nicole Mclaughlin"

      18 Vogue, "Moschino 2015 S/S"

      19 Marc Jacobs, "Marc Jacobs the redux grunge collection"

      20 IKEAhackers, "Ikea frakta bag DIY"

      21 Vogue, "Gucci 2018 Resort"

      22 Vogue, "Gucci 2018 F/W"

      23 Visla, "Gucci 2016 F/W"

      24 Dirpset, "Diesel’s bootleg store ‘Deisel’from Dirpset"

      25 Vaidhyanthan, S., "Copyrights and copywrongs" NYU Press 2001

      26 Vogue, "Christopher Shannon 2014F/W"

      27 Rojas, P., "Bootleg culture"

      28 Bostonglobe, "Bernie Sanders’ logo"

      29 Vogue, "Balenciaga 2017 F/W"

      30 D.it repubblica, "Ancuta Sarca"

      31 Shin, J. I., "A study on the pastiche in contemporary fashion design works" Hongik University 2008

      32 Lee, M. S., "A study on fashion design using logo" 3 (3): 103-112, 1999

      33 Jung, H. J., "A study of fansubs, non-professional subtitling on the internet: With a focus on “sex and the city”" Dongguk University 2010

      34 한지영, "3D 프린터의 출현과 지식재산권" 한국저작권위원회 27 (27): 145-170, 2014

      35 김병오, "1960-80년대 해적판 레코드 대중화 과정 연구" 한국공연문화학회 (24) : 47-78, 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.63 0.63 0.58
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.58 0.71 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼