Q-방법론을 활용한 한반도 통일에 관한 인식 분석

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study illuminates subjective perceptional differences on unification issues by applying Q-methodology. The analytical focus centers on the characteristics/differences/implications of diverse perception structure held by the major participants of the unification policy process, including professors in the advisory committee, bureaucrats, executives of NGO's, and members of the public.The paper constructs a Q~sample with 31 Q-statements answered by 31 subjects. By utilizing the PQMethods 2.09 program, we classify five categories of perceptional characteristics on unification issues. Also, we identify some perceptional features for various subject groups. These results clearly indicate that diverse and/or opposing policy preferences are mingled in the policy process. Thus, we need to create open and effective communication channels among the participants of the policy process. In addition, a mechanism that can ensure fair and accurate political bargaining and compromise among policy stakeholders should be constructed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정규호, "환경보존 담론의 유형에 대한 Q 방법론적 연구" 8 (8): 93-111, 2000

2 "통일의 사회문화적 접근 남북한 사회문화 교류와 통합방향 모색" 29 (29): 421-443, 1995

3 윤덕희, "통일문화 형성의 방향과 실천과제" 31 (31): 165-190, 1997

4 이정희, "통일관련 사회단체의 이념적 차별성 연구 남북관계와 대북정책의 인식을 중심으로" 42 (42): 117-149, 2002

5 이기종, "통일과정의 정치적 리더쉽" 30 (30): 225-244, 1996

6 "지방자치의 발전을 저해하는 요인분석 Q방법론의 적용" 7 (7): 5-25, 1997

7 "정치ㆍ행정학에 있어서 Q 방법론의 활용" 13 : 79-106, 1993

8 김용호, "정상회담 이후 남북관계에 대한 평가" <제2차 남북 정상회담과 평화체계구축>" 2001

9 "정보화사업 평가기준을 위한 Q 방법론의 활용방안" 5 (5): 207-226, 2002

10 "북한의 핵무기 개발과 미국의 대북 정책" 7 (7): 99-118, 2003

11 이재봉, "미국의 대 북한 정책의 변화와 남한 통일 외교의 과제" 30 (30): 203-224, 1996

12 이교덕, "대북정책에 대한 국민적 합의기반 조성 방안" 2000

13 "냉전의 종식과 북한의 안보전략변화 북ㆍ미관계에의 함의" 7 (7): 129-153, 2003

14 배성인, "남북한 사회문화 교류협력의 전개과정과 특징 - 김대중 정부에 대한 평가와 향후 과제 북한연구학회보" 7 (7): 273-300, 2003

15 이철기, "남북한 군비통제 및 군축정책에 대한 비판적 고찰 통일시대를 위한 새로운 방향 모색" 29 (29): 511-541, 1995

16 오일환, "남북정상회담 이후 북한의 대남 전술의 특징과 대응책" 43 (43): 255-273, 2003

17 "The Study of Behavior University of Chicago Press" 1953

18 "The New Science of Management Decision" 1960

19 Ascher, "The Evolution of the Policy Sciences Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5" 365-373, 1986

20 "Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment" Prentice-Hall Inc 1980

21 "Response to Beryl Radin and Rerry L" 1989

22 "Representative Exposure and the Clarification of Values Paper presented at a meeting of the Policy Sciences Institute Yale University School of Law" 1994

23 "Reconstructive Democratic Theory" 87 (87): 48-60, 1999

24 "Reassessing the ROK-US Alliance: Transformation Challenges and the Consequences of South Korea's Choices" 57 (57): 281-307, 2003

25 "Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions" 59 : 297-323, 1986

26 "Q Methodology" In Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration, edited by G. J. Miller, and M. L. Whicker" Marcel Dekker Inc 599-637, 1999

27 "Priority Setting Techniques for the Budgetary Process An Experimental Comparison to Determine What Works Experimental Study of Politics 9" 94-117, 1990

28 "Power and Strategy After Iraq" 82 (82): 60-73, 2003

29 Adams, "North Korea in 2003. Asian Survey" 44 (44): 139-146, 2004

30 "Korean Peninsula and Russia" International Affairs: A Russian Journal of World Politics" 49 (49): 24-33, 2003

31 "Japan's Engagement Dilemmas with North Korea" 41 (41): 549-563, 2001

32 "Gambling with the House Money and Trying To Break Even The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice" 643-60, 1990

33 "Concourse Theory of Communication" 21-3 40, 1978

34 "China's New Diplomacy." 82 (82): 22-35, 2003

35 "China and the North Korean Crisis" 76 (76): 347-373, 2003

36 "Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science" Yale University Press 1980

37 "An Experimental Approach to Program Planning and Evaluation" 279-286, 1985

38 "A Pre-view of Policy Sciences" 1971

39 "A Place at the Table: Policy Analysts, Its Postpositive Critics, and the Future of Practice"" 18 (18): 411-424, 1999

40 배종윤, "1990년대 한국의 대북정책과 관료정치 통일부와 국가정보원을 중심으로" 37 (37): 147-165, 2003