RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      1950년대 비평에서의 전통과 모더니티 인식 = An Argument on Tradition and Modernity in the 1950`s Criticism

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19646151

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the 1950's, Korean literary world in hopeless situation after war was faced to a turning point to develop to modern literature. Besides the confusion and generation gap attendant on transition, there are various attempts to seek the newness that is the feature of contemporary literature(modernism). At that time, new generation critics professing 'apre`s guerre' are appeared, and writers composed the works in the other way of established literary form of older generation. Especially, they inspected the whole past literature as tradition, and accepted existentialism and modernism considered as the contemporaneousness.
      Hereupon the tradition-modernity argument was happened between older and new literary generation. this argument combined two complicated factors was spread widely to the whole literary world. First, new generation denied the literature composed by older generation that came into literary power, in the way of denying the tradition. Second, new generation critics that literature of older generation is naturalism and conservative lyricism failed to grasp the reality after war. Therefor, modernism based on existentialism is advocated by them as the modern literary form that can deny old literary tradition.
      Until the latter half of 1960's the argument on tradition was continued, and the practical attempts to unit the tradition and modernity were presented in various form. It is evaluated to significant sense of this argument that was ended as discussion about the construction of the anti-imperialistic & anti-feudal, national literature, having the notion that tradition is the inheritance that is available to build current literature through the recognition about present problems. That is to say, this argument contributed to develop the korean modern national literature. Finally, this tradition-modernity controversy was developed to the theory of national literary theory of the 1970's.
      번역하기

      In the 1950's, Korean literary world in hopeless situation after war was faced to a turning point to develop to modern literature. Besides the confusion and generation gap attendant on transition, there are various attempts to seek the newness that is...

      In the 1950's, Korean literary world in hopeless situation after war was faced to a turning point to develop to modern literature. Besides the confusion and generation gap attendant on transition, there are various attempts to seek the newness that is the feature of contemporary literature(modernism). At that time, new generation critics professing 'apre`s guerre' are appeared, and writers composed the works in the other way of established literary form of older generation. Especially, they inspected the whole past literature as tradition, and accepted existentialism and modernism considered as the contemporaneousness.
      Hereupon the tradition-modernity argument was happened between older and new literary generation. this argument combined two complicated factors was spread widely to the whole literary world. First, new generation denied the literature composed by older generation that came into literary power, in the way of denying the tradition. Second, new generation critics that literature of older generation is naturalism and conservative lyricism failed to grasp the reality after war. Therefor, modernism based on existentialism is advocated by them as the modern literary form that can deny old literary tradition.
      Until the latter half of 1960's the argument on tradition was continued, and the practical attempts to unit the tradition and modernity were presented in various form. It is evaluated to significant sense of this argument that was ended as discussion about the construction of the anti-imperialistic & anti-feudal, national literature, having the notion that tradition is the inheritance that is available to build current literature through the recognition about present problems. That is to say, this argument contributed to develop the korean modern national literature. Finally, this tradition-modernity controversy was developed to the theory of national literary theory of the 1970's.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼