RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국방품질경영체제(DQMS) 정량평가모델 개발 및 제도화 방안 연구 = A Study on the Development and Institutionalization Plan of a Quantitative Evaluation Model of Defense Quality Management System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108168344

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a quantitative evaluation model for the defense quality management system and suggest institutionalization plans. To this end, another existing evaluation model was reviewed and analyzed to develop a qu...

      Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a quantitative evaluation model for the defense quality management system and suggest institutionalization plans. To this end, another existing evaluation model was reviewed and analyzed to develop a quantitative evaluation model applicable to military institutions.
      Methods: In this study, in order to establish a DQMS quantitative evaluation model, a military product quality level survey model and a defense quality model operated in the defense field were analyzed. In addition, evaluation models and indicators were analyzed by investigating evaluation models operated by other institutions and private sectors.
      Results: As a result of the study, the total score of the DQMS model was 1,000 points, 600 points for maturity level indicators and 400 points for operation performance indicators, and the evaluation items consisted of 7 major categories and 25 middle categories.
      The maturity level index 600 points are 70 points for organizational situation, 60 points for leadership, 40 points for planning, 100 points for support, 180 points for operation, 90 points for performance evaluation, and 60 points for improvement.
      Conclusion: It will be easy to quantify and evaluate the operating level of DQMS certified companies through the application of the DQMS quantitative evaluation model and evaluation criteria presented in this study. As a result, it will be possible to grasp the level of quality management system and the areas of improvement, and the overall level of improvement can be expected by inducing voluntary improvement activities through
      sharing of best practices and identifying improvement cases.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 차명선 ; 장중순, "반도체기업에서의 품질경영시스템의 성숙도 평가 모형" 대한설비관리학회 14 (14): 35-44, 2009

      2 박준현 ; 김민우, "군수품 생산업체 품질수준 측정지표 및 모형 개발에 관한 연구" 한국산학기술학회 20 (20): 107-116, 2019

      3 김판규 ; 이동욱, "국방품질경영시스템의 도입실태와 발전방향에 관한 연구" 산업경영연구소 31 (31): 151-173, 2008

      4 박종만 ; 양준모 ; 김영길, "계층분석과정 기법을 활용한 국방품질경영체제 규격 중요도 실증 연구" 한국신뢰성학회 20 (20): 271-276, 2020

      5 Gal Jieun, "Study on prioritizing methods for quality improvement of global strategic product" Graduate School of Industrial Sungkyunkwan University 2011

      6 Ha Jinsik, "Research Report on the Operation of Domestic and Overseas Quality Certification System Technical Report of DTaQ" 2014

      7 Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ), "Military Supplies Quality Management Basic Regulation"

      8 International Organization for Standardization(ISO), "ISO 9004:2018-Quality management-Quality of an organization-Guidance to achieve sustained success"

      9 International Organization for Standardization(ISO), "ISO 10014:2021-Quality management systems-Managing an organization for quality result-Guidance for realizing financial and economic benefits"

      10 Saaty TL, "How to Make Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process" 24 : 1991

      1 차명선 ; 장중순, "반도체기업에서의 품질경영시스템의 성숙도 평가 모형" 대한설비관리학회 14 (14): 35-44, 2009

      2 박준현 ; 김민우, "군수품 생산업체 품질수준 측정지표 및 모형 개발에 관한 연구" 한국산학기술학회 20 (20): 107-116, 2019

      3 김판규 ; 이동욱, "국방품질경영시스템의 도입실태와 발전방향에 관한 연구" 산업경영연구소 31 (31): 151-173, 2008

      4 박종만 ; 양준모 ; 김영길, "계층분석과정 기법을 활용한 국방품질경영체제 규격 중요도 실증 연구" 한국신뢰성학회 20 (20): 271-276, 2020

      5 Gal Jieun, "Study on prioritizing methods for quality improvement of global strategic product" Graduate School of Industrial Sungkyunkwan University 2011

      6 Ha Jinsik, "Research Report on the Operation of Domestic and Overseas Quality Certification System Technical Report of DTaQ" 2014

      7 Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ), "Military Supplies Quality Management Basic Regulation"

      8 International Organization for Standardization(ISO), "ISO 9004:2018-Quality management-Quality of an organization-Guidance to achieve sustained success"

      9 International Organization for Standardization(ISO), "ISO 10014:2021-Quality management systems-Managing an organization for quality result-Guidance for realizing financial and economic benefits"

      10 Saaty TL, "How to Make Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process" 24 : 1991

      11 fense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ), "Defense Quality System Certification Service Regulation"

      12 Park Donghoon, "An Empirical Study on the Performance of Defense Quality Management System and Certification Outcomes for Military Contractors" Graduate School, Seoul National University of Science and Technology 2007

      13 Jeon Changkwon, "A Study on the Evaluation of Quality Management Activities of Domestic Military Companies using AHP Techniques" Graduate School of Korea University 1999

      14 Kang Jinwoo, "A Study on the AHP-Based Company Rating System" DTaQ 2013

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-07-01 평가 등재후보로 하락(현장점검) (기타) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.88 0.88 0.8
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.93 1 0.751 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼