RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      근대 한국불교의 종교정체성 인식  :  1910-1930년대 불교잡지를 중심으로 = A Study on the Recognition of Religious Identity of Modern Korean Buddhism : centered on the articles in the Buddhist magazines of 1910-1930s periods

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99551684

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper attempts to examine how the modern Korean Buddhism responded to the concept ‘religion’, a western term newly imported in the late 19th century Korea. The concept ‘religion’ made a controversial effect on the modern Korean religious terrain. ‘Religion’ originally meant the recovering of relationship between man and God after the Sin’ in the context of the western history. So it implied that only Christianity could be ‘a religion’ or a ‘true religion’ according to the definition of religion. With the introduction and the spread of the concept ‘religion’, ‘宗敎’, in the modern Korean society, Buddhism faced an identity crisis as a religion. Many Christians criticized Buddhism as ‘an idolatry and superstition’, ‘a kind of atheism’ or ‘a philosophy’. That is to say, they labelled Buddhism as a ‘non-religion’ or ‘pseudoreligion’. So modern Korean Buddhists made some important responses to this threat of Christianity. First, modern Korean Buddhists argued that Buddhism was not only a philosophy but also a religion including philosophy, that is, 'a philosophical religion’. Secondly, they accepted the idea of Buddhism as an atheism, but they went further. They insisted that atheism was a higher form of religion than theism in the evolutionary stages of religion, so Buddhism was superior to any other religion. Finally, they concluded that Buddhism had its own religious characteristics and values that were very unique and unsurmountable by any other religion. Adopting the typology of religion, modern Korean Buddhists could categorize Buddhism as a ‘religion of meditation’ whereas theistic religion was categorized as a ‘religion of prayer’. Through those reactions, the modern Korean Buddhism could secure its genuine religious identity among many religions of the world.
      번역하기

      This paper attempts to examine how the modern Korean Buddhism responded to the concept ‘religion’, a western term newly imported in the late 19th century Korea. The concept ‘religion’ made a controversial effect on the modern Korean religious ...

      This paper attempts to examine how the modern Korean Buddhism responded to the concept ‘religion’, a western term newly imported in the late 19th century Korea. The concept ‘religion’ made a controversial effect on the modern Korean religious terrain. ‘Religion’ originally meant the recovering of relationship between man and God after the Sin’ in the context of the western history. So it implied that only Christianity could be ‘a religion’ or a ‘true religion’ according to the definition of religion. With the introduction and the spread of the concept ‘religion’, ‘宗敎’, in the modern Korean society, Buddhism faced an identity crisis as a religion. Many Christians criticized Buddhism as ‘an idolatry and superstition’, ‘a kind of atheism’ or ‘a philosophy’. That is to say, they labelled Buddhism as a ‘non-religion’ or ‘pseudoreligion’. So modern Korean Buddhists made some important responses to this threat of Christianity. First, modern Korean Buddhists argued that Buddhism was not only a philosophy but also a religion including philosophy, that is, 'a philosophical religion’. Secondly, they accepted the idea of Buddhism as an atheism, but they went further. They insisted that atheism was a higher form of religion than theism in the evolutionary stages of religion, so Buddhism was superior to any other religion. Finally, they concluded that Buddhism had its own religious characteristics and values that were very unique and unsurmountable by any other religion. Adopting the typology of religion, modern Korean Buddhists could categorize Buddhism as a ‘religion of meditation’ whereas theistic religion was categorized as a ‘religion of prayer’. Through those reactions, the modern Korean Buddhism could secure its genuine religious identity among many religions of the world.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 왜 종교 정체성 논쟁인가?
      • Ⅱ. 문제의 소재와 배경
      • Ⅲ. 불교의 종교 정체성 문제를 야기한 기독교의 비판
      • Ⅳ. 종교 정체성을 지키려는 불교의 대응
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 왜 종교 정체성 논쟁인가?
      • Ⅱ. 문제의 소재와 배경
      • Ⅲ. 불교의 종교 정체성 문제를 야기한 기독교의 비판
      • Ⅳ. 종교 정체성을 지키려는 불교의 대응
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼