Choosing a Reference Corpus for Keyword Calculation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Keywords, which are known to provide a useful way to characterize a text, are usually calculated using two word lists, one from the study corpus (SC) and the other from the reference corpus (RC). Although this notion of keywords has attracted great attention and been employed in many corpus-based language studies, the issue of what constitutes a good or appropriate RC has been left largely untouched, although an RC is generally expected to be larger in size than the SC. This paper looks into how different factors associated with the RC affect the outcome of the keyword calculation of a given SC. The results indicate that genre and diachrony are more important factors to consider than other factors when choosing an RC, especially in that the differences in these two factors, unlike those in other factors such as corpus size and varietal difference, bring about a statistically significant difference in the number of the keywords. Despite the possible effects that the size and composition of the RCs can have on keyword calculation and resulting differences in keyword results, however, keyword analysis is very robust and keywords can be plausible indicators of aboutness, regardless of the RC one chooses. Thus, the aboutness of a text should be interpreted with its possible diversity caused by the use of different RCs in mind.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 고광윤, "한국 영자신문 영어의 코퍼스 바탕 연구" 한국현대언어학회 23 (23): 601-619, 2008

2 Tribble,C, "Writing Difficult Texts.Ph.D.thesis.Lancaster University" Lancaster University 1999

3 Algeo,J, "The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. VI, English in North America" Cambridge University 2001

4 Scott, M, "Textual Patterns: Keyword and Corpus Analysis in Language Education" John Benjamins 2006

5 Swan,M, "Practical English Usage" Oxford University 2005

6 Mahlberg,M, "Patterns in news stories ,in:Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse" Peter Lang 99-132, 2009

7 Scott,M, "Oxford Wordsmith Tools 5.0" Lexical Analysis Software 2008

8 Biber, D, "Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English" Longman 1999

9 Berber-Sardinha,T, "Lingüuíistica de Corpus" Manole 2004

10 McEnery,T, "Keywords and moral panics: Mary Whitehouse and media censorship ,in:What's in Word-list? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction" Ashgate 2009

11 Kemppanen,H, "Keywords and ideology in translated history texts: A corpus-based analysis" 5 (5): 89-106, 2004

12 Scott,M, "In search of a bad reference corpus ,in: Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction" Ashgate 2009

13 Tribble,C, "Genres, keywords, teaching: towards a pedagogic account of the language of project proposals ,in: Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective: Papers from the Third International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora" Peter Lang 75-90, 2000

14 Seale, C, "Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups" 62 (62): 2577-2590, 2006

15 Rayson,P, "From key words to key semantic domains" 13 (13): 519-549, 2008

16 O'Keeffe, A, "From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching" Cambridge University 2007

17 McEnery, T, "Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book" Routledge 2006

18 Berber-Sardinha,T, "Comparing corpora with WordSmith Tools: How large must the reference corpus be" 9 : 7-13, 2000

19 Algeo,J, "British or American English" Cambridge University 2006

20 Dunning,T, "Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence" 19 (19): 61-74, 1993