RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고통스러운 예술의 역설 : 스트롤의 부사구주의 쾌 이론과 강한 양가성 = The Paradox of Painful Art: Strohl on Adverbialist Theory of Pleasure and Strong Ambivalence

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107773991

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper I critically explore Matthew Strohl’s adverbialist theory of pleasure and its tenability as an account for the paradox of painful art under the category of strong ambivalence. Strohl proposes adverbialism as an alternative to the Folk Theory according to which pleasure and pain are taken to be phenomenally characterized feelings. I claim that, because of underestimating the role of phenomenal character of pleasure and pain, his theory has counterintuitive ramifications, though the explanatory power of his version of adverbialism is superior to that of other competing versions. Strong ambivalence solutions hold that we enjoy, or take pleasure in, the overall appreciation of painful art, not in despite of, but partly in virtue of the negative affect, or pain. I argue that Strohl’s adverbialism exaggerates the role of pain in response to painful art while being inferior to the Folk Theory where it must explain it rightly, and hold that it is not even a live option for explaining the inverse version of strong ambivalence.
      번역하기

      In this paper I critically explore Matthew Strohl’s adverbialist theory of pleasure and its tenability as an account for the paradox of painful art under the category of strong ambivalence. Strohl proposes adverbialism as an alternative to the Folk ...

      In this paper I critically explore Matthew Strohl’s adverbialist theory of pleasure and its tenability as an account for the paradox of painful art under the category of strong ambivalence. Strohl proposes adverbialism as an alternative to the Folk Theory according to which pleasure and pain are taken to be phenomenally characterized feelings. I claim that, because of underestimating the role of phenomenal character of pleasure and pain, his theory has counterintuitive ramifications, though the explanatory power of his version of adverbialism is superior to that of other competing versions. Strong ambivalence solutions hold that we enjoy, or take pleasure in, the overall appreciation of painful art, not in despite of, but partly in virtue of the negative affect, or pain. I argue that Strohl’s adverbialism exaggerates the role of pain in response to painful art while being inferior to the Folk Theory where it must explain it rightly, and hold that it is not even a live option for explaining the inverse version of strong ambivalence.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조선우, "예술 속 재현과 부정적 감정의 문제" 한국미학회 83 (83): 143-170, 2017

      2 최근홍, "독특한 현상으로서 비극의 역설: 인과적 접근과 동기 접근" 한국미학회 84 (84): 265-295, 2018

      3 최도빈, "‘비극의 역설’에 대한 고찰 : 흄에서 현대까지의 논의들" 한국미학회 (59) : 135-184, 2009

      4 Feagin, Susan, "The Pleasures of Tragedy" 20 : 1983

      5 Carroll, Noël, "The Philosophy of Horror, or, Paradoxes of the Heart" Routledge 1990

      6 Gaut, Berys, "The Paradox of Horror" 33 : 1993

      7 Menninghaus, Winfried, "The Distancing-Embracing Model of the Enjoyment of Negative Emotions in Art Reception" 40 : 2017

      8 Aristotle, "The Complete Works of Aristotle Vol. 2" Princeton University Press 1984

      9 Smuts, Aaron, "Suffering Art Gladly: The Paradox of Negative Emotion in Art" Palgrave MacMillan 2014

      10 Korsmeyer, Carolyn, "Savoring Disgust : The Foul and the Fair in Aesthetics" Oxford University Press 2011

      1 조선우, "예술 속 재현과 부정적 감정의 문제" 한국미학회 83 (83): 143-170, 2017

      2 최근홍, "독특한 현상으로서 비극의 역설: 인과적 접근과 동기 접근" 한국미학회 84 (84): 265-295, 2018

      3 최도빈, "‘비극의 역설’에 대한 고찰 : 흄에서 현대까지의 논의들" 한국미학회 (59) : 135-184, 2009

      4 Feagin, Susan, "The Pleasures of Tragedy" 20 : 1983

      5 Carroll, Noël, "The Philosophy of Horror, or, Paradoxes of the Heart" Routledge 1990

      6 Gaut, Berys, "The Paradox of Horror" 33 : 1993

      7 Menninghaus, Winfried, "The Distancing-Embracing Model of the Enjoyment of Negative Emotions in Art Reception" 40 : 2017

      8 Aristotle, "The Complete Works of Aristotle Vol. 2" Princeton University Press 1984

      9 Smuts, Aaron, "Suffering Art Gladly: The Paradox of Negative Emotion in Art" Palgrave MacMillan 2014

      10 Korsmeyer, Carolyn, "Savoring Disgust : The Foul and the Fair in Aesthetics" Oxford University Press 2011

      11 Strohl, Matthew, "Pleasure as Perfection: Nicomachean Ethics 10. 4-5" Oxford University Press 41 : 257-287, 2011

      12 Ryle, Gilbert, "Pleasure" 28 : 1954

      13 Neill, Alex, "On a Paradox of the Heart" 65 : 1992

      14 Strohl, Matthew, "Horror and Hedonic Ambivalence" 70 : 2012

      15 Hume, David, "Essays Moral, Political and Literary" Indianapolis Liberty Classics 1987

      16 Levinson, Jerrold, "Emotion and the Arts" Oxford University Press 1997

      17 Davies, Stephen, "Distancing, Not Embracing, the Distancing-Embracing Model of Art Reception" 40 : 2017

      18 Strohl, Matthew, "Art and Painful emotion" 14 : 2019

      19 Smuts, Aaron, "Art and Negative Affect" 4 : 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-06-17 학술지등록 한글명 : 미학
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Aesthetics
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.43
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.45 1.026 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼