RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      헤겔의 ‘화해’ 규정을 통해 본 근대예술 : 장르화에서 객관적 유머까지 = Seeing modern art through Hegel’s ‘reconciliation’: From genre painting to objective humor

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107773992

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Hegel's ‘Romantic Form of Art’, modern art phenomena are described alongside with the history of modern subjectivity, so one can encounter the brilliant Christian art that blossomed in Italian paintings and immortal literatures that outstandingly portray the heart of modern people. Hegel diagnosed that the world was separated from reality and abstracted due to the contradictions prevalent in modern life and consciousness, and presented reconciliation with reality as the task of philosophy. Art was also identified as having a vocation to manifest this reconciliation through external existence. In Dutch genre painting This reconciliation was expressed in contentment and joy savored amid life hardships. However, at the turn of the 19th century when this form of art were on the verge, there was a disastrous phenomena in German art that have lost their subject matter and failed to find an appropriate expression form. Many genius artists had been paying attention to everyday life that by then completely had become the material of art by closely observing the reality to which they belong, with the power and talent to destroy existing regulations and to create new things. Nevertheless, they have not yet been able to express reconciliation, as staying in the subjective humor completely separated from the art object or the infinite longing for the time passed away. However, from objective humor the deep movement of the mind to discover the vitality in even insignificant objects and to savor everyday lives were occurred, and through this the empty longing and capricious subjectivity are sublated. Eventually, the new subject matter of universal humanity and the free interior of the artist had reached to reconciliation, and Hegel witnessed the spiritual beauty as a representation of this reconciliation in Goethe's West-östlicher Divan.
      번역하기

      In Hegel's ‘Romantic Form of Art’, modern art phenomena are described alongside with the history of modern subjectivity, so one can encounter the brilliant Christian art that blossomed in Italian paintings and immortal literatures that outstanding...

      In Hegel's ‘Romantic Form of Art’, modern art phenomena are described alongside with the history of modern subjectivity, so one can encounter the brilliant Christian art that blossomed in Italian paintings and immortal literatures that outstandingly portray the heart of modern people. Hegel diagnosed that the world was separated from reality and abstracted due to the contradictions prevalent in modern life and consciousness, and presented reconciliation with reality as the task of philosophy. Art was also identified as having a vocation to manifest this reconciliation through external existence. In Dutch genre painting This reconciliation was expressed in contentment and joy savored amid life hardships. However, at the turn of the 19th century when this form of art were on the verge, there was a disastrous phenomena in German art that have lost their subject matter and failed to find an appropriate expression form. Many genius artists had been paying attention to everyday life that by then completely had become the material of art by closely observing the reality to which they belong, with the power and talent to destroy existing regulations and to create new things. Nevertheless, they have not yet been able to express reconciliation, as staying in the subjective humor completely separated from the art object or the infinite longing for the time passed away. However, from objective humor the deep movement of the mind to discover the vitality in even insignificant objects and to savor everyday lives were occurred, and through this the empty longing and capricious subjectivity are sublated. Eventually, the new subject matter of universal humanity and the free interior of the artist had reached to reconciliation, and Hegel witnessed the spiritual beauty as a representation of this reconciliation in Goethe's West-östlicher Divan.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박정훈, "후마누스와 장미십자가: 괴테와 헤겔이 본 종교와 예술" 한국미학회 84 (84): 169-212, 2018

      2 서정혁, "헤겔의 천재론" 한국헤겔학회 (37) : 23-48, 2015

      3 홍혜선, "헤겔의 '낭만적 예술형식'에 나타난 세속화 이후 근대예술" 한국미학회 86 (86): 259-286, 2020

      4 헤겔, G. W. F., "헤겔미학Ⅲ: 개별 예술들의 변증법적 발전" 나남 1998

      5 헤겔, G. W. F, "헤겔미학Ⅱ: 동양예술, 서양예술의 대립과 예술의 종말" 나남 1997

      6 이진석, "헤겔과 낭만주의-17세기 네덜란드 풍속화를 중심으로" 한국미학회 (52) : 315-338, 2007

      7 헤겔, G. W. F, "청년헤겔의 신학론집: 베른/프랑크푸르트 시기" 그린비 2018

      8 헤겔, G. W. F., "역사철학강의" 동서문화사 2014

      9 헤겔, G. W. F., "법철학" 한길사 2016

      10 헤겔, G. W. F., "미학강의1: 예술미, 상징적 예술형식" 세창출판사 2021

      1 박정훈, "후마누스와 장미십자가: 괴테와 헤겔이 본 종교와 예술" 한국미학회 84 (84): 169-212, 2018

      2 서정혁, "헤겔의 천재론" 한국헤겔학회 (37) : 23-48, 2015

      3 홍혜선, "헤겔의 '낭만적 예술형식'에 나타난 세속화 이후 근대예술" 한국미학회 86 (86): 259-286, 2020

      4 헤겔, G. W. F., "헤겔미학Ⅲ: 개별 예술들의 변증법적 발전" 나남 1998

      5 헤겔, G. W. F, "헤겔미학Ⅱ: 동양예술, 서양예술의 대립과 예술의 종말" 나남 1997

      6 이진석, "헤겔과 낭만주의-17세기 네덜란드 풍속화를 중심으로" 한국미학회 (52) : 315-338, 2007

      7 헤겔, G. W. F, "청년헤겔의 신학론집: 베른/프랑크푸르트 시기" 그린비 2018

      8 헤겔, G. W. F., "역사철학강의" 동서문화사 2014

      9 헤겔, G. W. F., "법철학" 한길사 2016

      10 헤겔, G. W. F., "미학강의1: 예술미, 상징적 예술형식" 세창출판사 2021

      11 서정혁, "괴테의 시문학에 대한 헤겔의 철학적 반응― 『파우스트』와 『서동시집』을 중심으로 ―" 한국철학회 (114) : 27-53, 2013

      12 장희창, "괴테의 『서동시집』과 세계시민주의의 전망" 한국괴테학회 (22) : 21-38, 2009

      13 Hegel, G. W. F., "Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik Ⅲ, Werke 15"

      14 Hegel, G. W. F., "Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik Ⅱ, Werke 14"

      15 Hegel, G. W. F., "Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik Ⅰ, Werke 13"

      16 Hegel, G. W. F., "Vorlesungen über die Philosophie des Rechts. Nachschriften zu den Kollegien der Jahre 1824/25 und 1831. Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 26.3" Felix Meiner 2015

      17 Hegel, G. W. F., "Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Werke 12"

      18 Hegel, G. W. F., "Vorlesungen zur Ästhetik, Vorlesungsmitschrift Adolf Heimamm(1828-1829)" Wilhelm Fink 2017

      19 Hegel, G. W. F., "Theorie Werkausgabe in 20 Bänden" Suhrkamp 1970

      20 Hegel, G. W. F., "Phänomenologie des Geistes, Werke 3"

      21 Hegel, G. W. F., "Philosophie der Religion Ⅱ, Werke 17"

      22 Hegel, G. W. F., "Philosophie der Kunst oder Ästhetik nach Hegel, im Sommer 1826. Mitschrift Friedrich Carl Hermann Victor von Kehler" Wilhelm Fink 2004

      23 Oliver, Alain P., "Hegel’s Last Lectures on Aesthetics in Berlin 1828/29 and the Contemporary Debates on the End of Art" European Society for Aesthetics 2017

      24 Hebbing, Niklas, "Hegels Ästhetik des Komischen" Felix Meiner Verlag 2015

      25 Jaeschke, Walter, "Hegels Philosophie" Felix Meiner Verlag 2020

      26 Rózsa, Erzsébet, "Hegel-Lexikon" Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 2006

      27 Rutter, Benjamin, "Hegel on the modern arts" Cambridge Univ. Press 2010

      28 Hegel, G. W. F., "Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, Werke 7"

      29 Hindrichs, Gunnar, "G. W. F. Hegel:Vorlesungen über die Asthetik" De Gruyter 2018

      30 Jaeschke, Walter, "G. W. F. Hegel: Vorlesungen über die Asthetik" De Gruyter 2018

      31 Hegel, G. W. F., "Frühe Schriften, Werke 1"

      32 Hegel, G. W. F., "Berliner Schriften, Werke 11"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-06-17 학술지등록 한글명 : 미학
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Aesthetics
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.43
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.45 1.026 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼