Based on T. S. Eliot’s cardinal literary essay “Tradition and the Individual Talent” (1919), this essay examines the two great poetic masters of the twentieth century, W. B. Yeats and T. S. Eliot. Touching on the poetic traditions of the two mas...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105000150
Shunichi Takayanagi (일본 소피아 대학교)
2005
-
KCI등재
학술저널
7-32(26쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Based on T. S. Eliot’s cardinal literary essay “Tradition and the Individual Talent” (1919), this essay examines the two great poetic masters of the twentieth century, W. B. Yeats and T. S. Eliot. Touching on the poetic traditions of the two mas...
Based on T. S. Eliot’s cardinal literary essay “Tradition and the Individual Talent” (1919), this essay examines the two great poetic masters of the twentieth century, W. B. Yeats and T. S. Eliot. Touching on the poetic traditions of the two masters, this essay shows how much Eliot absorbed Yeats’s poetic tradition into his own poetry through the deep communion with his senior.
The poetic tradition of W. B. Yeats is bound up with theosophy, magic, occultism, Irish mythology, Irish legendary heroes at the dawn of history, saints and poets wandering around the island before the coming of Anglo-Saxons. Yeats’s poetic world is fundamentally different from that of Eliot; Yeats’s existential sense of ‛prolonged genocidal humiliation’ is ‛the bitter culmination of seven centuries of British policy in Ireland’ while Eliot’s starting point is with ‘his sense of inner devastation’ against the background of ‘overwhelming desacralization of the Western world.’
Nonetheless, Eliot had learned much from the poetry of Yeats whose poetry is one of ‘refrain, of repetition in a finer tone, raised to the Sublime, to the limits of art.’ Such solemn refrains or incantations raised to the limits of language are also found in Eliot’s major poetic works; The Waste Land, “Ash-Wednesday”, and Four Quartets. On his part, obviously Yeats also learned something from his junior’s critical dictum, “No poet, no artist of any art, has his complete meaning alone. His significance, his appreciation is the appreciation of his relation to the dead poets and artists,” when he defined his theory of supreme art; “Supreme art is a traditional statement of certain heroic and religious truth, passed on from age to age, modified by individual genius, but never abandoned.”
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Donoghue, Denis, "Words Alone: The Poet T. S. Eliot" New Haven: Yale UP 2000
2 "The Oxford Book of Modern Verses 1892-1935" New York: Oxford UP 1936
3 Heaney, Seamus, "The Government of the Tongue" New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1989
4 "The Complete Poems and Plays of T. S. Eliot" London: Faber 1969
5 Finneran, Richard J., "The Collected Poems of W. B. Yeats" New York: Scribner 1996
6 "Selected Essays" London: Faber 1980
7 "On Poetry and Poets" New York: Farrar, Straus and Cudahy 1957
8 Bloom, Harold, "Genius" New York: Warner 2002
9 "Essays and Introduction" London: Macmillan 1961
10 Yeats, W. B., "Autobiographies" London: Macmillan 1955
1 Donoghue, Denis, "Words Alone: The Poet T. S. Eliot" New Haven: Yale UP 2000
2 "The Oxford Book of Modern Verses 1892-1935" New York: Oxford UP 1936
3 Heaney, Seamus, "The Government of the Tongue" New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1989
4 "The Complete Poems and Plays of T. S. Eliot" London: Faber 1969
5 Finneran, Richard J., "The Collected Poems of W. B. Yeats" New York: Scribner 1996
6 "Selected Essays" London: Faber 1980
7 "On Poetry and Poets" New York: Farrar, Straus and Cudahy 1957
8 Bloom, Harold, "Genius" New York: Warner 2002
9 "Essays and Introduction" London: Macmillan 1961
10 Yeats, W. B., "Autobiographies" London: Macmillan 1955
11 Eliot, T. S., "After Strange Gods" London: Faber 1934
12 "A Vision" New York: Macmillan 1961
13 Hughes, Ted, "A Danger to God: Tributes to T. S. Eliot" London: Faber 1992
「텅 빈 사람들」: 악몽 혹은 비전-“경계 상황” 속의 텅 빈 사람들-
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2017-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.14 | 0.11 | 0.366 | 0.06 |