RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

      건강정보 접근방법별 소비자 평가 결과 비교 = Comparison of Consumer Evaluation by Sources of Health Information

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101593260

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: Each consumer uses different consumer evaluation by sources of health information, considering the influences of consumers' socio-demographic characteristics, health status, attitude to health, and types of health information needed. Method...

      Objective: Each consumer uses different consumer evaluation by sources of health information, considering the influences of consumers' socio-demographic characteristics, health status, attitude to health, and types of health information needed. Methods: Sources of health information include web-based resources, health professionals, and publications such as medical books, magazines, newspapers, etc. Data were collected from 1,189 respondents through a telephone survey, among whom 513(43%) responses were finally included in the analysis. The results were analysed by statistical methods including Chi-square, multiple regression, and correlation analyses. Results: Key findings are as follows. First, there were significant differences in evaluation results by different sources of health information. Access to health professionals shows positive outcomes in general, followed by web-based resource. Second, the significant factors related to the access outcomes were different in each domains such as easiness, amount, understanding, reliability, and helpfulness. In addition, while access to health professionals was found to have significant influence on health behavior by improving the ability of health management, access to internet improved only the understanding of health information. Conclusion: Access to health professionals for health information was positively related to utilization outcomes in general, but access to publications was negatively related to outcomes. Despite the increase in the number of web-based users, they could not rely on the information they found. To effectively utilize various sources of health information and improve the nation's health by providing appropriate health information, quality assurance strategy for contents in health information websites and active intervention by health professionals should be pursued.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "but there is room for improvement in searches and overall internet access" health searches and email have become more commonplace 2003July18

      2 "and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet The Journal of the American Medical Association 1997" 277 (277): 1244-1245,

      3 "Use of the internet and e-mail for health care information" 289 (289): 2400-2406, 2003

      4 "Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companions" 100 (100): 2476-83, 2004

      5 "Usage of health information on the internet" 97 (97): 71-87, 2004

      6 "The survey of the demand for health information on the internet" 8 (8): 17-24, 2002

      7 "The internet's challenge to health care provision" 312 (312): 3-4, 1996

      8 "The impact of health information on the internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship survey among 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003" 5 (5): 17-,

      9 "Study on the influence of health information from TV-amusement programs on practice of health behavior" 20 (20): 187-202, 2003

      10 "Requests for medical advice from patient and families to health care providers who publish on the World Wide Web" 157 (157): 209-212, 1997

      1 "but there is room for improvement in searches and overall internet access" health searches and email have become more commonplace 2003July18

      2 "and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet The Journal of the American Medical Association 1997" 277 (277): 1244-1245,

      3 "Use of the internet and e-mail for health care information" 289 (289): 2400-2406, 2003

      4 "Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companions" 100 (100): 2476-83, 2004

      5 "Usage of health information on the internet" 97 (97): 71-87, 2004

      6 "The survey of the demand for health information on the internet" 8 (8): 17-24, 2002

      7 "The internet's challenge to health care provision" 312 (312): 3-4, 1996

      8 "The impact of health information on the internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship survey among 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003" 5 (5): 17-,

      9 "Study on the influence of health information from TV-amusement programs on practice of health behavior" 20 (20): 187-202, 2003

      10 "Requests for medical advice from patient and families to health care providers who publish on the World Wide Web" 157 (157): 209-212, 1997

      11 "Rating health information on the internet" 279 (279): 611-614, thejournaloftheamericanmedicalassociation1998

      12 "Perceptions of Latinos,African Americans,and Whites on media as a health information source" 10 : 147-167, 1999

      13 "Oxford textbook of public health" Oxford University Press 429-447, 1991

      14 "Modernity and self-identity" Stanford University Press 1-256, 1991

      15 "Mixing medicine and entertainment:TV confronts its role as health educator" 128 (128): 54-, 2000

      16 "Medicine and television" 20 (20): 61-64, 1997

      17 "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society" 52 (52): 1549-53, 2004

      18 "Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet." 60 : 1467-1478, 2005

      19 "Health information on the internet" 157 (157): 151-152, archivesofinternalmedicine1997

      20 "Health articles on mass media in Korea:facts and amelioration" 43 (43): 202-203, 2000

      21 "Guidelines for medical health information sites on the internet:principles governing AMA web sites" 283 (283): 1600-1606, 2000

      22 "Doctor in the house" 21 (21): 820-835, sociologyofhealthandillness1999

      23 "Development of gateway system for internet health information Institute for Health and Social Affair" 1-327, 2003

      24 "Current status and policy strategies of providing health information through TV" 31 (31): 74-83, 1999

      25 "Criteria for the websites in Korean with health information on the internet" 5 (5): 119-124, 1999

      26 "Consumer satisfaction and evaluation of health information sites in the internet" 19 (19): 49-68, 2002

      27 "Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them" 59 (59): 1795-1806, 2004

      28 "Analysis of case of harm associated with use of health information on the internet" 287 (287): 2869-2871, 2002

      29 "Access to health information and support apublic highway or a private road The Journal of the American Medical Association 1998" 280 (280): 1371-1375,

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-04-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한의료정보학회지 -> Healthcare Informatics Research
      외국어명 : Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics -> Healthcare Informatics Research
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.24 0.24 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.18 0.15 0.434 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼