일본의 ‘건물의 구분소유 등에 관한 법률’에 있어서의 區分所有權의 動態 = Behaviors of Partition Ownership in terms of Japan's ‘Building Partition Ownership Act’

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The revision of Japan's Building Partition Ownership Act in 2002 can be broadly outlined as follows: First, it revised provisions on modification of public partition in Article 17. Secondly, it intended to enhance administrator's rights to the maintenance of public partition. Thirdly, it focused on the computerization of meeting, resolution, bylaw and memorandum. Fourthly, it dealt with preparing ‘right to demand purchase' after resolution on restoration. Fifthly, it intended to relieve requirements for resolution on reconstruction. Sixthly, it dealt with approval and resolution on reconstruction of buildings within complex. Seventhly, it dealt with introduction of en bloc resolution on the reconstruction of buildings within complex.
In terms of 7 major considerations about Building Partition Ownership Act, this study focuses primarily on delineating revision on modification of public partition in Article 17, relaxation of requirements for resolution on building reconstruction, approval and resolution on reconstruction of buildings in complex, introduction of en bloc resolution on reconstruction of buildings in complex, which are the key issues of said Act in 2002.
By discussing historical evolution and major considerations of Japan's Building Partition Ownership Act, this study came to the following conclusions:
First, this study could find out historical development, evolution, major considerations and challenges of said Building Partition Ownership Act in Japan. Secondly, it was found that area of private law interacts closely with that of public law in regard to maintenance, management and reconstruction of mansion or tenement(co-op). Thirdly, according to comparative examination into majority rule, it was found that the Tenement Building Act of Korea is considerably reconstruction-oriented statute. So it is necessary to perform further jurisprudential works in terms of said act.
The issue of mansion and tenement means that of inside comprising such construction. Overall, there are three major issues of mansion and tenement, such as ‘issue of reinforced concrete building’, ‘legal and institutional issue of partition ownership’ and ‘issue of residential style on the basis of changing family structure.’ Hence, how we can resolve these issues in near future is a shortcut to fundamental resolution of issues in mansion and tenement.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강혁신, "구분소유권의 소유권성 변질론" 한국민사법학회 (40) : 2008

2 坂和章平, "注解マンション建替え円滑化法" 林書院 2003

3 水本浩, "基本法コンメンタ?ル, マンション法" 日本評論社 1999

4 丸山英, "分所有法" 大成出版社 1984

5 丸山英, "分所有法" 大成出版社 2008

6 本洋之助, "コンメンタ?ル マンション?分所有法" 日本評論社 1997

7 丸山英??折田泰宏, "これからのマンションと法" 日本評論社 2008

8 藤木良明, "“集合住宅の?展とその居住をめぐる諸問題”, 藤木良明編, ?21世紀の都市居住?, スペ?スニュオン, 2002"

9 丸山英, "“改正?分所有法の性格”, ジュリスト 第795?, 1983"

10 吉田徹, "“建物の?分所有等に?する法律の一部改正について”, 法律のひろば, 第56? 第5?, ぎょうせい, 2003.5"

11 飯島正ほか, "“座談? ?分所有法等の改正と今後のマンション管理”, ジュリスト1249, 有斐閣"

12 丸山英?, "“?分所有法の?遷と法構造?化”, マンション? 第29?, 日本マンション??, 2008"

13 大野武, "“?分所有制度の法律構成に?する一考察”, マンション? 第12?, 日本マンション??, 2001"

14 白羽祐三, "“?分所有?”, ジュリスト 118?, 有斐閣, 1956"

15 千葉?三子, "“???新マンション建替え決議制度?理論的視点から”, ジュリスト No.1249, 2003.7.15, 有斐閣"

16 梅謙次, "?民法要義?物?法?, 有斐閣, 1911, 108면"

17 鎌野邦紀, "?改正?分所有法＆建替え事業法の解??, 民事法?究?, 2004"

18 濱崎恭生, "?改正?分所有法の?要?、社?法人商事法務?究?、1983"

19 濱崎恭生, "?建物?分所有法の改正?, 法曹?, 1989"

20 山正明, "?不動産法第5卷 ?分所有法?, ?山書林, 1997"