성년후견인의 의료행위 동의권 = Right of Consent on Medical Treatment of Adult Guardian

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is time to think about the welfare of the aged population in the rapidly aging society, which is rapidly accelerating compared to other developed economies. In this regard, it is believed that adopting a civil service system in the Civil Service has significant implications. The system of civil rights in civil law is designed in the framework of the basic framework of self-determination of ward. However, the initiation of adult guardianship is not a situation that can make a reasonable decision on its own, so it can be said that it is necessary for the adult guardian to help. But the Civil Code is asking those who are in this situation to decide the doctor's decision, and it is not really for the benefit of those who are not physically capable.
Especially, medical treatment that accompanies physical invasion is serious. Such medical treatment are available in considerably wide and various forms including regular health examinations, influenza vaccination, cold remedy administration, various operations and evisceration. If a ward cannot give consent to any other medical treatment except all cases of physical violation in the above list of treatment, there is a question about who can exert the right of consent on the medical treatment. Moreover, it is medical contract that is required to be signed by relevant parties before any medical treatment for a ward who lost any capacity to give consent to the treatment. Here, there is also a question about who shall sign on the medical contract.
In the case of medical care for the ward, the consent of the ward shall be obtained. This can be said to justify the medical practice of a doctor. Doing so without consent constitutes an infringement of the body of a ward, constitutes an infringement of the body of a guardian year, and a problem of compensation or criminal problems. If you allow medical practice without consent, you may encounter a violation of the basic rights of the ward.
Therefore, if the caregiver considers the benefit of the ward to promote the benefit of the ward, the person in question shall be allowed to consent to the consent of the person in question. The guardian system is to acknowledge the property management and personal protection of the ward. Therefore, if there is an adult guardian for a ward who has lost his / her ability to consent, he / she may be entitled to certain authority from the guardian's duty to protect the adult guardian. From this, it can be said that the medical care for the ward is also authorized. Therefore, I think that adult guardians can be granted consent for normal medical treatment.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이덕환, "현대법학의 이론 - ｢우제이명구박사화갑기념논문집(Ⅲ)｣" 고시연구사 1996

2 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 1995

3 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2005

4 권용우, "진료과오 및 약화사고의 책임" 단국대학교 출판부 5 : 1981

5 오호철, "일본의 성년후견제도상 의료행위의 동의" 한국법학회 (39) : 85-108, 2010

6 최상회, "인폼드 컨센트(Informed Consent)의 법리구조" 한국법학회 (33) : 111-134, 2009

7 송영민, "의약품 임상시험에서의 피험자의 자기결정권 확보방안" 법학연구소 (46) : 145-173, 2010

8 김현태, "의사의 진료과오에 있어서의 과실의 입증책임" 연세대학교행정대학원 7 : 1981

9 백승흠, "의료행위의 동의능력과 代諾의 범위 -독일, 일본법과 비교하여-" 한독사회과학회 22 (22): 69-96, 2012

10 이덕환, "의료행위와 법" 현문사 2010

11 김혁돈, "의료행위에 있어서 환자의 동의의 의미" 법학연구소 31 (31): 219-240, 2007

12 이도국, "의료행위에 있어서 성년후견" 법학연구소 31 (31): 501-523, 2014

13 김용한, "의료행위에 의한 책임" 법조협회 32 (32): 1983

14 김천수, "의료행위에 대한 동의능력과 동의권자" 한국민사법학회 (13·14) : 1996

15 곽명섭, "의료행위 개념의 법제화 논의과정에 대한 고찰" 한국법정책학회 7 (7): 65-81, 2007

16 김기령, "의료와 인권" 대한의학협회 23 (23): 1980

17 이재경, "의료분야에서 성년후견제도의 활용에 관한 연구" 법학연구원 21 (21): 255-279, 2009

18 박수곤, "의료계약의 민법편입과 과제" 한국민사법학회 60 : 193-269, 2012

19 김민중, "성년후견제도의 도입에 관한 논의에서 의료행위와 관련한 과제" 한국법학원 112 : 208-239, 2009

20 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 도입논의와 영국의 정신능력법의 시사점" 한국가족법학회 21 (21): 275-310, 2007

21 문성제, "성년후견인의 의료행위에 대한 동의권과 법률상의 제 문제" 한국의료법학회 17 (17): 1-27, 2009

22 송호열, "성년후견법제의 도입에 따른 의료행위와 동의권" 원광대학교 법학연구소 7 : 2012

23 김형배, "민법학강의" 신조사 2009

24 김준호, "민법강의" 법문사 2010

25 김천수, "成年後見과 醫療行爲의 決定" 한국가족법학회 21 (21): 1-30, 2007

26 丸山英三, "成年後見人の醫療同意權に關する若干の考察" 民事法硏究會 (54) : 2015

27 新井誠, "成年後見と醫療行爲" 日本評論社 2007

28 加藤良夫, "実務医事法講義" 民事法硏究會 2005

29 "Bamberger/RothKommBGB(2003)/Müller, BGB §1904, Rn.4 참조"