RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      종교와 과학의 관계에 대한 한국 개신교의 이해 = 일제 강점기를 중심으로

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims to examine the Korean protestant intellectuals’ discourses on the relationship between science and religion during the Japanese colonial period. Modem secular rationalists criticized Christian belief system as a kind of superstition....

      This paper aims to examine the Korean protestant intellectuals’ discourses on the relationship between science and religion during the Japanese colonial period. Modem secular rationalists criticized Christian belief system as a kind of superstition. Especially anti-Christianity and anti-religion movements by socialists became a fatal threat on the identity of protestantism as a religion.
      In response to such challenges, Protestant intellectuals produced four kinds of discourses on the relationship between science and religion. The first was a product of protestant modernists, who compared the relationship of science and religion to two wheels of a vehicle. This means that science and religion are two instruments of civilization, always supporting each other.
      The second was mainly produced by the theologically liberal camp, which gave a stress that religion ought to accept the scientific spirits. In their opinion, the conflicts between science and religion come from religion. Therefore religion, especially the conservative protestantism, should be rationalized in order to survive in the age of science.
      The third was produced by the fundamentalists, who judged that the conflicts between science and religion originate from the misplaced scientific inferences, not science itself. In other words, the war between science and religion comes from secular materialism, under the guise of science. Therefore they tried to reveal the intellectual violences of scientific imperialism, arguing that science itself need not be enemy.
      The last was produced by theological modernists and secular liberalists, who demand ed the complete separation of science and religion. They stressed that scientific language and religious language should be separated for the sake of the permanent peace between science and religion.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 반종교 담론의 등장과 전개
      • 3. 개신교의 과학 담론
      • 4. 맺음말
      • Abstract
      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 반종교 담론의 등장과 전개
      • 3. 개신교의 과학 담론
      • 4. 맺음말
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼