노동위원회 신뢰제고와 활성화를 위한 제언 = Suggestions for Enhancing Trust and Activation of Labor Relations Commission

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the establishment of the Labor Relations Commission, its function has been expanded due to the increase in labor disputes caused by the complicated relations between labor and capital and labor market. Thus, expectations for the Labor Relations Commission as a dispute resolution organization for quick and fair resolution of labor disputes are growing and there are more and more requirements but both labor and management do not recognize the Labor Relations Commission as an trustworthy or fair organization with expertise in resolving labor disputes in terms of conciliation and adjudication at a satisfactory level.
The reliability problem for the Labor Relations Commission results in the institutional problem and problem of expertise of chairperson, members of standing committee, Commissioner and commissioners and investigators who are members of the Labor Relations Commission and the fixedness of conciliation and adjudication.
Under the current system where the Labor Relations Commission is an administrative committee belonging to the Ministry of Employment and Labor and thus, the Ministry of Employment and Labor has personnel matters and budgeting rights, the Labor Relations Commission is considered not to be free from the administration, causing distrust. To solve this problem, the Labor Relations Commission should be a commission directly responsible to the President or if maintaining the current system, independence of the Labor Relations Commission should be ensured in the personnel matters and budgeting.
A person with more than 5 years of experience in the relations between labor and capital should be appointed as the chairperson of the local Labor Relations Commission and those with law career or majors of labor law should be appointed as members of member of a standing committee to enhance professionalism and the number should be increased significantly and ambiguity of each role should be resolved.
Also, qualifications should be strengthened to ensure professionalism in appointment of Labor Relations Commission members and Expertise in Labor Relations Act and experience in the workplace should be emphasized for adjudication members and conciliation members, respectively and the fairness of appointment procedures should be ensured.
An investigator rotationally works in the Ministry of Employment and Labor and Labor Relations Commission according to the rotation transfer of civil servants and Ministry of Employment and Labor job rotation should be abolished or limited to ensure the continuity of responsible job in order to enhance the expertise of investigators.
In addition, neutrality should be ensured in the selection of members in the event processing process and configuration of the adjudication commission and conciliation commission and fairness should be sought in adjudication procedures and conciliation procedures.
Furthermore, it is important to deal with labor disputes quickly in the Labor Relations Commission and to do this, a smooth resolution by reconciliation is desirable in terms of the nature of the relations between labor and capital. Reconciliation recommendation meeting and reconciliation system before adjudication test-operated in Chungbuk Labor Relations Commission satisfy this condition. We think that this needs to be institutionalized.
To activate the Labor Relations Commission, it is necessary to expand its function in order to respond to the demands of resolving labor disputes quickly and fairly. One of measures meeting these requirements is to allow the Labor Relations Commission to handle overdue wage remedy cases.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 신뢰성 제고와 관련한 제 문제
• Ⅲ. 노동위원회의 신뢰제고와 공정성 강화 방안
• Ⅳ. 신속하고 적절한 사건처리
• Ⅴ. 노동위원회 기능강화를 위한 제언
• Ⅵ. 맺는 말
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 충북지방노동위원회, "화해권고회의 운영결과 분석 및 향후계획"

2 김철용, "행정법" 고시계사 2012

3 허재준, "임금채권보호제도 개선 방안"

4 김경태, "이행강제금제도의 효율적 운용을 위한 제언 ― 부과기준의 합리화․일원화 방안을 중심으로 ―" 한국비교노동법학회 28 : 315-366, 2013

5 김홍엽, "민사소송법(제4판)" 도서출판 박영사 2013

6 배인연, "노사갈등과 분쟁해결론" 중앙경제 2002

7 이승욱, "노동위원회제도 발전방안 세부연구" 노동부 2009

8 이승길, "노동위원회의 운영상 개선방안에 관한 소고" 한국비교노동법학회 27 : 239-289, 2013

9 김선수, "노동위원회의 역할과 과제" 한국노동법학회 (29) : 2000

10 이승길, "노동위원회의 발전방안에 관한 연구 -노동위원회의 구성과 위상의 개선방안을 중심으로-" 법학연구소 21 (21): 137-174, 2013

11 조성관, "노동위원회의 노동분쟁 해결기능 제고를 위한 법제도 개선에 관한 연구" 아주대학교 대학원 2014

12 도재형, "노동위원회와 법원, 그 갈등과 조절" 한국노동법학회 (29) : 35-74, 2009

13 이승길, "노동위원회 조정제도의 활성화를 통한 분쟁해결방안에 관한 소고" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (33) : 475-542, 2012

14 김홍영, "노동위원회 심판제도의 현황과 개선" 단국대학교 분쟁해결연구소 2 (2): 2004

15 이동걸, "노동위원회 심판제도의 개선 방안" 단국대학교 대학원 2015

16 중앙노동위원회, "노동위원회 60년 평가와 향후 발전방안 연구" 2014

17 박은정, "노동분쟁해결제도 개선방향의 모색" 한국노동법학회 (22) : 71-96, 2006

18 박종철, "노동분쟁의 대상과 분쟁해결제도에 관한 고찰" 한국비교노동법학회 (12) : 2007

19 유성재, "노동분쟁에서 권리구제절차의 문제점과 개선방안" 중앙대학교 법학연구소 29 (29): 2005

20 김홍영, "노동분쟁에 대한 노동위원회의 역할과 개선과제" 한국노동법학회 (21) : 2005

21 노병호, "노동법1" 진원사 2014

22 이상윤, "노동법(제6판)" 法文社 2011

23 임종률, "노동법" 박영사 2016

24 김형배, "노동법" 박영사 2014

25 하갑래, "근로기준법(제25판)" 중앙경제 2013

26 고용노동부, "고용노동백서" 2015

27 충북지방노동위원회, "2016년 업무추진계획"